CodeSonar vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

AdaCore and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. AdaCore is ranked #34, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.9. AdaCore holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of AdaCore users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

3,449 Views
2,380 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

11,784 Views
7,424 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and CodeSonar compete in the field of security testing and static code analysis. Burp Suite showcases greater flexibility and versatility, while CodeSonar offers a robust approach to vulnerability detection.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers excellent web security testing, automation features, and customizable testing processes. CodeSonar stands out with static code analysis, advanced vulnerability detection, and suitability for complex software systems.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancing Burp Suite's performance speed and efficiency for large-scale scans. CodeSonar needs better user accessibility, improved tool integration, and quicker technical support. Burp Suite's real-time interaction is an added area for future improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is noted for easy setup and responsive support. CodeSonar requires more technical expertise for deployment, and while support is reliable, users desire quicker response times and more detailed assistance.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is valued for cost-effectiveness and short-term ROI in web security testing. CodeSonar demands a larger investment but offers significant long-term security benefits, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive code analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,781 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 3.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	3.6%
CodeSonar	1.1%
Other	95.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable and we have used it for a long time with no issues."

"I would suggest trying out automated tools along with CodeSonar on your project, and you will find out that CodeSonar reports many more defects compared to other static analysis tools, so this is a very important tool."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"It has helped us a lot with some issues and has helped us avoid bad code."

"CodeSonar has helped our organization because it detects dead and nonusable parts of code to create a more optimized code."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

More CodeSonar pros

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."

"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations, with a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning, and we also have the option of creating our own configurations, such as how often the applications need to be scanned, along with good reporting and dashboards that integrate well with other task management applications we are using."

"It's good testing software."

"If you compare it to more expensive tools like WebInspect or IBM AppScan, you'll realize that, at a very low cost, Burp Suite can provide good results."

"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."

"The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner."

"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."

"The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"It was difficult for us to apply a rule, especially to a part of the code, and not apply it to the rest of the code."

"The MISRA guidelines were not appropriately reported and there were some flags or errors."

"It was expensive."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

More CodeSonar cons

"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."

"The one feature that I would like to see in Burp is active scanning of REST based web services. A lot of organizations are providing APIs to access their services to support different business models like SaaS. Scanning these APIs is still a challenge for many security product companies."

"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."

"One area for improvement is the integrated browser, Chromium. Single Sign-On (SSO) methods like Microsoft authentication login sometimes fail and show errors. As a workaround, I have to use a different browser, such as Firefox, to log in and make Burp work."

"The professional edition of Burp Suite provides some automated pen-testing scripts to detect application vulnerabilities, like SQL injection, XSS, etc. However, this component is not extremely useful."

"There are some memory issues, where the application runs out of memory and crashes."

"If we're running a huge number of scans regularly, it slows down the tool."

"The solution lacks sufficient stability."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"The price for the solution is expensive and could be cheaper. We pay an annual license and our team has several of them."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"This is a value for money product."

"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,781 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 10% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 5% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 16% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

July 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

No data available

Burp

Overview

CodeSonar offers a potent tool for static code analysis, adept in detecting runtime errors and security vulnerabilities, with a fast deployment process and scalable capabilities. Its quick analysis and efficient web interface provide a strong basis for code quality validation.

CodeSonar specializes in identifying runtime errors, dead code, and security threats while providing features like code surfing and browsing. It offers a highly efficient web interface, though users find initial setup complex and highlight the need for better static analysis, broader language support beyond C and C++, and an improved licensing model. Despite these challenges, its integration with Jenkins and technical guidance support makes it a reliable choice for teams in defense and software quality assessment. Deployment is quick and easy, yet initial costs are a common concern among users.

What are the key features of CodeSonar?

Quick Analysis: Delivers fast runtime error detection and reporting.
GUI Interface: Offers a user-friendly experience for code browsing.
Scalability: Efficiently deploys across various environments.
Security and Code Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities and potential bugs.
Effective Configuration: Simplified log and analysis configuration.

What benefits can be seen in user reviews?

Detection of Code Vulnerabilities: Enhances security with robust threat detection.
Process Integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools such as Jenkins.
Scalable Deployment: Quickly adaptable in expanding environments.
GUI Usability: Highly efficient for technical teams to navigate.

CodeSonar is primarily implemented in industries like defense and companies prioritizing code quality. Teams utilize its static code analysis and threat detection capabilities, integrating with Jenkins for continuous integration workflows. Security checks post-builds and technical support are common, aiding in effective defect management.

AdaCore

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a vital tool for cybersecurity experts, valued for features like Intruder and Repeater, and offering strong automation for effective vulnerability detection and web security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional aids organizations in conducting comprehensive application security testing. With functions like scanning, proxy setup, and numerous plugins, it provides essential support for vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. Despite needing improvements in reporting, false positive reduction, and scanning speed, it remains adaptable for different security operations through its automation, extensive community support, and regular updates. Licensing and pricing flexibility are considerations, alongside API security enhancements and documentation improvements. Widely used for intercepting and scanning web applications pre-launch, it supports compliance testing while offering tools for request replaying, traffic manipulation, and brute forcing.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

Intruder: Automates attacks to test web application vulnerabilities.
Repeater: Lets users send modified requests to observe responses.
Extender: Supports additional functionalities through plugins.
API Support: Offers capabilities for automated workflows and integrations.
Vulnerability Scanner: Efficiently detects application security flaws.

What benefits should users consider?

Affordable Pricing: Offers value through cost-effective plans.
Community Support: Access a robust network for troubleshooting and advice.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines security testing processes.
Regular Updates: Continuous improvements and feature developments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is implemented to enhance application security frameworks. It provides critical insights for regulatory compliance and risk management. The tool's adaptability supports organizations in routinely identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against potential threats and facilitating secure application launches.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

June 2026

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,781 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.