Mimecast Incydr vs Safetica ONE comparison

Mimecast and Safetica are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Safetica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0. Mimecast holds a 2.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to Safetica’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Safetica users who would recommend it.

Mimecast Incydr

Read 78 Mimecast Incydr reviews

2,883 Views
1,384 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Safetica ONE

Read 8 Safetica ONE reviews

1,646 Views
1,514 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Mimecast Incydr

Safetica ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Mimecast Incydr and Safetica ONE are competitors in data security, focusing on preventing data breaches and ensuring compliance. Mimecast has an edge in pricing and support, while Safetica ONE is favored for its expansive features.

Features: Mimecast Incydr offers strong email security, threat detection, and archiving solutions. It prevents data leaks through analytics and advanced threats. Safetica ONE provides comprehensive data loss prevention, endpoint security, and user behavior analysis, making it more well-rounded in its offerings.

Room for Improvement: Mimecast Incydr could benefit from enhancing features beyond email security and improving integration with broader IT systems. Its analytics could also be more comprehensive. Safetica ONE might improve initial configuration efficiency and expand its automated features. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness could also elevate its user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast Incydr employs a cloud-based model focusing on rapid integration and minimal disruption, backed by extensive technical support. Safetica ONE offers both cloud and on-premises deployments for flexibility yet may require more initial configuration. Mimecast's straightforward deployment is accessible, while Safetica's flexibility caters to diverse IT conditions.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast Incydr is competitively priced, offering scalable packages and attractive ROI, especially through its email security solutions. Safetica ONE is seen as more costly but provides high ROI through extensive security features and customization, appealing to those prioritizing long-term data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safetica ONE

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Insider Risk Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safetica ONE is 2.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Safetica ONE	2.1%
Mimecast Incydr	2.4%
Other	95.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Sobaan Shamsi

Sales Attendant at Zoffec Infotech

A cost-effective solution that can be used for regulatory compliance, but its stability could be improved

ESET Safetica is a basic endpoint-level DLP solution that gives the basic functionality at the browser gateway or endpoint ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price. Users who want the solution for compliance are procuring…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable."

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

Cons

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"The product needs to improve support."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

What do you like most about ESET Safetica?

The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET Safetica?

Safetica ONE is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Safetica?

The SafeticaONE is great platform if youre looking for solution with DLP with Insider threat protection and Data Classification with UEBA. It is one of the best solution when it comes to SME custom...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 14% of the time

Zecurion DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 7% of the time

More Safetica ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr

January 2026

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download Safetica ONE product report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Discover, classify, analyze, and protect data intuitively with a seamless user experience. Stop threats and stay compliant with regulations and industry standards.

Safetica

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Mitsubishi Motors, Canon

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE

December 2025

Free Report: Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Incydr vs. Safetica ONE report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.