CockroachDB vs Oracle Database Cloud Service comparison

Cockroach and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6. Cockroach holds a 3.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,677 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Read 13 Oracle Database Cloud Service reviews

304 Views
225 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CockroachDB and Oracle Database Cloud Service are significant players in the database solutions market, each with unique strengths. CockroachDB is favored for affordability and ease of use, while Oracle Database Cloud Service is preferred for its extensive features, despite higher costs.

Features: CockroachDB offers fault-tolerance, a low learning curve, and ease of setup with open-source options. Its distributed architecture and geo-partitioning provide flexibility and resiliency. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides high availability, scalability, and seamless integration with existing systems. It benefits from features like automated maintenance and advanced security, offering comprehensive cloud capabilities suitable for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: CockroachDB needs better Postgres compatibility, extensibility, and enhanced geo-partitioning features. Disaster recovery and automatic failover capabilities also require strengthening. Oracle Database Cloud Service faces pricing challenges, customer relationship issues, and cross-region replication difficulties. It also needs improvements in handling large-scale applications and reducing implementation complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CockroachDB is praised for improved response times and effective AI chatbot assistance, performing well in both public and on-premises setups. Oracle Database Cloud Service offers flexible deployment in hybrid environments but receives mixed feedback on customer support, with users desiring more consistent interactions.

Pricing and ROI: CockroachDB is noted for its affordability and flexibility, particularly with its open-source and serverless models, offering good ROI. The cost and performance balance is appreciated. Oracle Database Cloud Service, though expensive, provides valuable licensing options and cloud flexibility, yielding good ROI in large-scale implementations, though more competitive pricing would enhance market appeal.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Cloud Service is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Ajeet-Sachan

Architect at Sony Pictures Entertainment

Self-maintenance features reduce downtime and improve efficiency but enterprise edition limits can be restrictive

The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved. The model divides their standard edition versus enterprise editions into two categories and limits the standard edition on a particular configuration set. This limitation, such as the thirty-two vCPU limit, should be removed. Another area for improvement is the affordability of the enterprise version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"The product has valuable security features."

More CockroachDB pros

"I am impressed with the product's partitioning and advanced data card."

"Data storage is the most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its scalability, advanced technology, cost-effectiveness, and the flexibility it provides with licensing."

"Some advantages of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its availability, performance, and affordability."

"Oracle DCS's most valuable features are its high availability and scalability."

"It is a very stable program."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service is its cloud capabilities."

"Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service pros

Cons

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

More CockroachDB cons

"We encountered connection failures for some of our sites."

"The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved."

"We're actually going through licensing issues and are looking to perhaps changing to another solution, something that is perhaps open-source."

"The initial setup is a bit complex for the beginner, so you need a little technical experience to install it."

"Oracle should work on the solution's compatibility issues with the operating system."

"The pricing must be improved."

"It would be nice to have a data dictionary reporting feature in the solution."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by adding some cross-region replication features."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"Pricing for Oracle Database Cloud Service could be more competitive. Lately, pricing for it has been increasing, so my company may have to review different options to find a solution with competitive pricing. From what I know, there's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees for Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"I think the program is rather expensive, so I would like to see it becoming more affordable."

"The tool is not cheap."

"Price is always higher for all Oracle products."

"The product has reasonable pricing. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"Every year we are increasing the price of the solution. There is hardware licensing available. We pay approximately $20,000 monthly to use the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Cloud Service?

Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Cloud Service?

In my opinion, the price of Oracle Database Cloud Service should be more affordable. Additionally, the interface of the application could be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Cloud Service?

I primarily use Oracle Database Cloud Service in HR services, collaborating with other teams on projects. It is used for database management for clients, especially in HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 22% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 16% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Kinetica vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 56% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 44% of the time

More Oracle Database Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

April 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Oracle Database Cloud Service product report

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service (Exadata Service) delivers the world's best Cloud Database Platform by combining the world's #1 database with Exadata, the most powerful database platform, and adding all the simplicity and cost effectiveness of the public cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Kagool, iPoint-Systems

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.