CockroachDB vs Oracle Database Cloud Service comparison

Cockroach and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.6. Cockroach holds a 4.1% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 13 CockroachDB reviews

2,165 Views
2,013 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Read 13 Oracle Database Cloud Service reviews

423 Views
410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CockroachDB and Oracle Database Cloud Service are significant players in the database solutions market, each with unique strengths. CockroachDB is favored for affordability and ease of use, while Oracle Database Cloud Service is preferred for its extensive features, despite higher costs.

Features: CockroachDB offers fault-tolerance, a low learning curve, and ease of setup with open-source options. Its distributed architecture and geo-partitioning provide flexibility and resiliency. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides high availability, scalability, and seamless integration with existing systems. It benefits from features like automated maintenance and advanced security, offering comprehensive cloud capabilities suitable for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: CockroachDB needs better Postgres compatibility, extensibility, and enhanced geo-partitioning features. Disaster recovery and automatic failover capabilities also require strengthening. Oracle Database Cloud Service faces pricing challenges, customer relationship issues, and cross-region replication difficulties. It also needs improvements in handling large-scale applications and reducing implementation complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CockroachDB is praised for improved response times and effective AI chatbot assistance, performing well in both public and on-premises setups. Oracle Database Cloud Service offers flexible deployment in hybrid environments but receives mixed feedback on customer support, with users desiring more consistent interactions.

Pricing and ROI: CockroachDB is noted for its affordability and flexibility, particularly with its open-source and serverless models, offering good ROI. The cost and performance balance is appreciated. Oracle Database Cloud Service, though expensive, provides valuable licensing options and cloud flexibility, yielding good ROI in large-scale implementations, though more competitive pricing would enhance market appeal.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 4.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Cloud Service is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CockroachDB	4.1%
Oracle Database Cloud Service	0.9%
Other	95.0%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Ajeet-Sachan

Architect at Sony Pictures Entertainment

Self-maintenance features reduce downtime and improve efficiency but enterprise edition limits can be restrictive

The availability of different editions within Oracle Database Cloud Service could be improved. The model divides their standard edition versus enterprise editions into two categories and limits the standard edition on a particular configuration set. This limitation, such as the thirty-two vCPU limit, should be removed. Another area for improvement is the affordability of the enterprise version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"What I like best is its ability to solve data residency issues. The main advantage is auto geo partitioning, built into the product. This means we don't have to spin up separate servers in each region, which would be much more costly."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"CockroachDB is excellent for managing relationships in RDBMS with multiple benefits such as the ability to create views and dynamic queries that save data and reduce the use of complex algorithms in code."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

More CockroachDB pros

"The self-maintenance features, auto maintenance, cleanup, and backup are the most valuable aspects of Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"I recommend Oracle Database Cloud Service as a good technology with excellent support and documentation."

"Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product."

"It is a very stable program."

"The product’s most valuable feature is affordable pricing compared to other providers."

"Data storage is the most valuable feature of Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"I am impressed with the product's partitioning and advanced data card."

"Some advantages of Oracle Database Cloud Service are its availability, performance, and affordability."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"The platform could be more extensible."

More CockroachDB cons

"Oracle Database Cloud Service could improve by adding some cross-region replication features."

"It would be nice to have a data dictionary reporting feature in the solution."

"Oracle Database Cloud Service has room for improvement in handling large-scale applications."

"The pricing must be improved."

"We encountered connection failures for some of our sites."

"The initial setup is a bit complex for the beginner, so you need a little technical experience to install it."

"The implementation process could be easier for customers."

"In my opinion, the price of Oracle Database Cloud Service should be more affordable. Additionally, the interface of the application could be more user-friendly."

More Oracle Database Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The tool is not cheap."

"Pricing for Oracle Database Cloud Service could be more competitive. Lately, pricing for it has been increasing, so my company may have to review different options to find a solution with competitive pricing. From what I know, there's no additional cost apart from the standard licensing fees for Oracle Database Cloud Service."

"The product has reasonable pricing. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"I think the program is rather expensive, so I would like to see it becoming more affordable."

"Every year we are increasing the price of the solution. There is hardware licensing available. We pay approximately $20,000 monthly to use the solution."

"Price is always higher for all Oracle products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for querie...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Cloud Service?

Security is the most valuable feature provided by the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Cloud Service?

In my opinion, the price of Oracle Database Cloud Service should be more affordable. Additionally, the interface of the application could be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Cloud Service?

I primarily use Oracle Database Cloud Service in HR services, collaborating with other teams on projects. It is used for database management for clients, especially in HR solutions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 26% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 15% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

SingleStore vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 35% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 32% of the time

Kinetica vs Oracle Database Cloud Service

Compared 32% of the time

More Oracle Database Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

September 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

August 2025

Download Oracle Database Cloud Service product report

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Service (Exadata Service) delivers the world's best Cloud Database Platform by combining the world's #1 database with Exadata, the most powerful database platform, and adding all the simplicity and cost effectiveness of the public cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Kagool, iPoint-Systems

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.