No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs HackerOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
2.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HackerOne
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (20th), Vulnerability Management (38th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), AI Observability (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Attack Surface Management (ASM) category, the mindshare of CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HackerOne is 3.6%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Attack Surface Management (ASM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HackerOne3.6%
CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise0.9%
Other95.5%
Attack Surface Management (ASM)
 

Featured Reviews

Prabhudarshan Samal - PeerSpot reviewer
Infosec Analyst at Zoetis
Brand monitoring has strengthened dark web detection and enabled faster fraud takedowns
The best feature CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise offers is the Brand Reputation module. What makes the Brand Reputation module stand out is its accuracy and coverage. The deep dark web feeds and intelligence I received were accurate approximately eight out of ten times. I was able to take quick actions, and proactive measures were implemented to remediate risks. CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements. We have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements.
NitishKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Crowdsourced security has strengthened our bug discovery and improved vulnerability response
HackerOne is already doing well, although I believe implementing stricter SLAs for the time to first response and time to bounty would help prevent researchers' burnout, especially regarding duplicate submissions. I suggest systematic bug rewards because currently, if a researcher finds one bug in multiple places, they often only get paid for one. Improving the handling of systemic vulnerabilities would encourage deeper research. Additionally, improving multi-currency and crypto payout options would help make the platform more accessible globally.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I recommend this platform because it uses AI plus threat intelligence technology that identifies phishing leaks and impersonations, and if anything is going to happen, this tool provides early threat detection, which is beneficial for our company."
"CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements, as we have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements."
"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."
"Using HackerOne has definitely improved the security of my web application, identifying security gaps I didn't realize as a web developer."
"If you have a very critical vulnerability, some good companies will acknowledge it and pay you accordingly based on severity."
"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."
"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."
"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."
"HackerOne has been the right fit for our current situation from both a functionality and cost-effectiveness perspective."
"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."
 

Cons

"I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation."
"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."
"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."
"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."
"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."
"However, some things can be improved, such as better report deduplication by automatically identifying duplicate vulnerability reports more accurately."
"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."
"HackerOne provides a "HackBot" which helps identify other relevant reports, including duplicates, public reports from other companies, etc. However, the functionality is limited and it would be nice to integrate it with broader services offered like auto responses, triggers, etc."
"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."
"The solution is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation.
What is your primary use case for CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I used CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise, specifically the Brand Reputation Monitoring module, when working for IBM from January to April 2024. The company's threat intelligence platform was utilized for...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it will definitely improve as the technology is already evolving. From time to time as we are learning, the AI is getting stronger and stronger. The threat landscape keeps evolving. The bes...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?
I'm not very sure about pricing, setup costs, and licensing, as those are managed by our management team.
What needs improvement with HackerOne?
HackerOne can be improved, and the insights can be a little better. I chose a nine for my rating because it has very great features such as a large research community, workflow integration, analyti...
What is your primary use case for HackerOne?
My main use case for HackerOne is bug bounties and getting paid through that platform. Companies like Fastify and Oracle create bug bounties and vulnerability disclosure programs on HackerOne. Ethi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs. HackerOne and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.