Cloudify vs nOps comparison

Cloudify and nOps.io are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #41, while nOps.io is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.6. Cloudify holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to nOps.io’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of nOps.io users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

2,027 Views
1,966 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

nOps

Read 5 nOps reviews

1,181 Views
968 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cloudify

nOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Cloudify and nOps are competing in the cloud management platform category, with Cloudify holding an advantage in flexibility and hybrid cloud capabilities, while nOps excels in automation and cost management.

Features: Cloudify offers robust orchestration, integration across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, and expansive customization. Key elements include its extensibility, deployment updates, and support for major cloud providers. nOps focuses on automation, with features like automated cost savings, continuous compliance, and a detailed cost insights dashboard. It supports Kubernetes agent capabilities and provides customized cost allocation.

Room for Improvement: Cloudify could enhance user experience with improved user interface design and more straightforward initial setup processes. It may benefit from expanding training resources and enhancing its community support. nOps could enhance its integration with more cloud services, improve manual cost allocation options, and offer more customization in its compliance reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudify supports various infrastructures via modular architecture, offering tailored technical support for different environments. nOps highlights rapid deployment through automated solutions and offers strategic guides, focusing more on self-service models.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudify's scalable pricing model helps optimize expenses as needs grow, proving beneficial for complex ecosystems. nOps emphasizes cost savings via resource usage efficiency, offering cost-effective solutions that ensure rapid ROI. Cloudify's strength lies in configuration flexibility, while nOps targets cost-saving efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. nOps Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. nOps

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

nOps

Ranking in Cloud Management

16th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.4%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of nOps is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
nOps	0.9%
Cloudify	1.4%
Other	97.7%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Works very well for advanced service chaining requirements and has extremely advanced engineers for support

We had a manager who thought that Cloudify could be used as a replacement for Horizon in OpenStack, but we found that Cloudify lacked the user interface or GUI for doing multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. Cloudify was really good at launching, for example, firewalls and configuring them and doing service chaining and rather advanced things like that, but it didn't meet the requirements for a basic platform management solution. It is something that seems to work better as a bolt-on or an augmented solution. It is a bit mis-marketed as a Cloud Management solution. It is not that. It is more of a service orchestration and automation tool. It is very good at doing that, but it fails to meet basic platform management requirements. Once you have it running, you can't really do anything with it without writing code and scripts. It requires a full-time DevOps person to use it. We deployed a Palo Alto firewall with it. That's basically what the project was for us, and it worked flawlessly once we got it finished, but it took another 12 weeks to get all of the automation and everything else coded, tested, and working. There is certainly a place for this technology, but when we got rid of OpenStack and moved to VMware, we either had to go with the vRealize Automation Suite to do this kind of automation, or we had to find an alternative solution to manage the private cloud. So, we put Cloudify in, but we really couldn't find it useful for basic platform administration tasks.

Read full review

Tom Weeks

Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs

I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Extensible internal functions and plugins. Can implement custom plugins to fit your scenario. Python based plugins."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements. It really works well there, and it fits the best. They have a standardized markup that's based on TOSCA, which is a standard. I like the fact that they're standards-based. Their solution works extremely well if you have the talent and the manpower to write TOSCA descriptors to deploy and interchange services or to automate the configuration and turn up of services."

"The best feature of Cloudify is that it enables a single platform to communicate with the DB, with applications, and with the entire infrastructure."

"Even with the learning curve, the solution is an interesting concept and reminds me of Vagrant Terraform with its own difficulties and easiness."

"Has great extendability which means you can build your own custom logic."

"You can use only what you need. You can remove certain Cloudify functions from the framework to create a "minified" version of what you need. This might only consist of the messaging delivery system, and the orchestration functions."

"This is a somewhat complex solution for very complex use cases where there are multiple cloud vendors, multiple infrastructures, and multiple configurations."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements; it really works well there, and it fits the best."

More Cloudify pros

"The solution provides actionable reporting and cost-saving recommendations."

"One customer saved 35 percent on their cloud bill, which is pretty significant."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

"Since making this shift, we have seen a twenty to thirty percent reduction in the total AWS compute expenditure, which represents a significant win for us."

"nOps smoothly integrated with our AWS infrastructure and achieved significant savings without much intervention from our internal team."

Cons

"Certainly the UI could use some intensive work, but nevertheless, overall, it’s a complete product with its 3.4 version and much better features are available with 4.0."

"More of the debug functionality is needed; hopefully, we can pause during the server building process."

"Install of the product itself could be improved and I would like to see better event monitoring."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

"I'd like to see a more simplified upgrade process so it can be completed in one step rather than multiple steps (snapshot backup + snapshot restore)."

"There were some issues with deploying the solution on OpenStack Mitaka."

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks."

"Error handling could be improved; GUI is lacking with respect to user privileges and connectivity."

More Cloudify cons

"The customer support is lacking but still pretty good."

"From the features, I would like to see RDS RIs and maybe better visibility on how the engine is deciding whether to use spot or on demand, to replace the instance or not"

"However, it misses a perfect score because multi-cloud feature parity is still catching up to its gold-standard AWS toolset."

"I suggest improving the heat map capability with the option to use showback values as the x and y-axis."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with nOps?

While the AWS integration is flawless and deeply mature, I believe the multi-cloud capabilities for platforms such as Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud Platform can sometimes feel a bit less comprehe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for nOps?

My primary use case for nOps is automated AWS cost optimization, FinOps compliance, and infrastructure visibility. I use it to instantly surface underutilized resources and automate the management ...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

Tieto OneCloud vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

CloudBolt vs Cloudify

Compared 5% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

Zesty vs nOps

Compared 16% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs nOps

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs nOps

Compared 9% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs nOps

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs nOps

Compared 8% of the time

More nOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

August 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

nOps

August 2026

Download nOps product report

Also Known As

No data available

nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

nOps is a robust tool that excels in managing AWS infrastructure by offering cost optimization, performance monitoring, compliance tracking, and change management. Users praise its real-time monitoring, user-friendly dashboard, and actionable insights that enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, and ensure compliance. nOps significantly improves productivity, collaboration, and strategic decision-making across organizations.

nOps.io

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. nOps

August 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. nOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. nOps and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. nOps report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.