Citrix Gateway and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway are leading solutions in the VPN gateway market. Users find Citrix Gateway to be more cost-effective and easier to support, although Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is favored for its extensive features and perceived value.
Features: Citrix Gateway offers centralized management, secure remote access capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway stands out for its integration with Microsoft services, advanced security features, and extensive capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Citrix Gateway could improve scalability, modernize its interface, and enhance user experience. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway needs better configuration simplicity, improved troubleshooting, and a streamlined setup process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Gateway is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive support. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway has a steeper learning curve but users are generally satisfied with support once understood. Citrix Gateway offers easier initial deployment, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway provides robust support post-deployment understanding.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix Gateway users report lower initial setup costs and faster ROI due to ease of integration. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway demands higher upfront investment but justifies it with comprehensive features and integration. Citrix Gateway is seen as offering cost benefits, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is viewed as an investment in extensive capabilities.
Citrix Gateway secures our environment from potential threats, which can save substantial financial resources, especially in preventing data breaches or ransomware attacks.
The solution provides significant cost savings, transitioning expenses from CapEx to OpEx.
The support experience has received mixed reviews, as not all support staff possess the necessary technical expertise to handle inquiries effectively.
In a recent incident, I had an issue with the SharePoint API. It relates to documentation, specifically the lack of up-to-date documentation because Microsoft is moving away from the traditional SharePoint REST API to Microsoft Graph.
Prioritization of tasks can also be challenging, impacting the timely resolution of problems.
The solution features high availability, supporting both active-passive and active-active deployments to ensure constant product availability.
I believe that the scalability of Citrix Gateway depends on the project's requirements, as it can vary from simple load balancing to extensive Web Application Firewall implementations.
The process was very efficient to scale the solution, which supports a high level of scalability.
I find Citrix products to be very stable.
Azure VPN Gateway is very stable due to reliance on Microsoft's own network.
The main purpose of Citrix Gateway is to enforce the appropriate level of access to the correct user on the proper device under the correct conditions.
At this time it costs 35% more than other solutions.
The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process.
I consider Citrix Gateway to be an expensive solution, generally ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 yearly, depending on the model.
The price of Azure VPN Gateway should be rated five from a purely invoice aspect.
The pricing is somewhat high but acceptable, considering it replaces the need for physical network equipment, leading to cost savings.
The product effectively helps me protect the organization's network from potential threats, thereby securing our environment from hackers and ransomware attacks.
Secure SaaS access is particularly valuable as it ensures that SaaS-based applications are delivered securely.
It's easy to scale and easy to implement.
It's cost-effective by eliminating the need for firewall and networking equipment purchases.
The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway | 6.3% |
| Citrix Gateway | 3.3% |
| Other | 90.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.
A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
