Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs TruView comparison

Cisco and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Cisco is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.5, while NETSCOUT is ranked #76. Cisco holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Read 62 Cisco Secure Network Analytics reviews

9,783 Views
4,011 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

2,499 Views
2,399 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

TruView and Cisco Secure Network Analytics are key players in the network performance and security market. Cisco Secure Network Analytics seems to have the upper hand with its advanced features justifying its higher cost.

Features: TruView provides real-time network monitoring, excellent application visibility, and seamless integration with existing systems. It offers efficient troubleshooting with minimal resource use. Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides enhanced security analytics, anomaly detection, and cloud integration, making it suitable for enterprises needing robust security measures.

Room for Improvement: TruView could enhance its security analytics and expand cloud integration capabilities. Improving anomaly detection would also be beneficial. Cisco Secure Network Analytics can improve its real-time monitoring to match competitor ease. Simplifying its setup process and enhancing its application visibility could boost user satisfaction further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView is noted for its straightforward deployment, enabling quick integration and efficient resource usage. It offers reliable customer support for rapid issue resolution. Cisco Secure Network Analytics may require a more complex setup but leverages Cisco's extensive support network for assistance.

Pricing and ROI: TruView is cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost, providing a quicker ROI, ideal for budget-restricted organizations. Cisco Secure Network Analytics demands a higher investment upfront, but offers substantial value over time with its comprehensive analytics and security features, justified for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (5th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th), Cisco Security Portfolio (8th)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

76th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Network Analytics	0.9%
TruView	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Harun-Owr-Roshid

CEO at BRIGHT-i SYSTEMS LIMITED

Have streamlined network visibility and troubleshooting while seeing benefits from AI integration

In terms of improvements for Cisco Secure Network Analytics, from the implementation point of view, now that AI is in use, some other features need to be upgraded considering AI solutions. Proper management of the database is also important; it should be centralized for easier data collection from a single database. When precise manual analysis is needed, it's sometimes difficult, so having a centralized database will allow network admins to find actual scenarios more effectively, especially since some information may not be visible on the GUI. Cisco should upgrade their hardware part to run the database, because sometimes it cannot handle the load while all features are running in the network. The database management should indeed be centralized because while AI runs behind the systems, central management is essential. For example, in a network with 100 Cisco switches, a few routers, firewalls, and access points, all data generated should be preserved in a central database. This approach simplifies management and analysis for troubleshooting, as GUI interfaces may not always provide visible information. Centralizing the database will allow for better understanding of which information is preserved for each specific device.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has been beneficial because it's cut down the amount of time involved in doing complex scenarios and research."

"The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight into my network, with great analytics and threat protection capabilities to detect faults and find viruses and trojans, and I can definitely say that this solution saves us time, money, and administrative work."

"It has improved my organization's network visibility from zero because before we had installed this solution, we weren't doing anything to protect us from threats."

"The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration."

"Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with."

"Great network monitoring, looking at anomaly detection and evaluation."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is data hoarding because it catches threats on a frequent basis that we had no idea of."

"Stealthwatch has definitely reduced the incident response time, making troubleshooting now only minutes instead of a couple of hours and increasing our threat detection rate by around 25-30%."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pros

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

Cons

"One area that could be improved in SNA is the integration with Cisco ISE for user and session details, which currently requires additional setup."

"Reliance on Java. Get away from that."

"The expensive nature of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We've run into some issues with the configuration."

"The overall visibility into the actual device itself would be helpful. I don't just want support-specific data, but also to be able to see information such as CPU and other internal components or usage of the devices."

"I'm not really sure it gives us a true picture."

"The initial setup of this solution is complex."

"Some of our customers find this solution to be a little bit tough because they don't understand how to configure and use it."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics cons

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. It costs several hundred thousand dollars per year (depending on how many flows you are collecting)."

"NetFlow is very expensive."

"The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000."

"The licensing costs are outrageous."

"One of the things which bugs me about Lancope is the licensing. We understand how licensing works. Our problem is when we bought and purchased most of these Lancope devices, we did so with our sister company. Somewhere within the purchase and distribution, licensing got mixed up. That is all on Cisco, and it is their responsibility. They allotted some of our sister company's equipment to us, and some of our equipment to them. To date, they have never been able to fix it."

"It is worth the cost."

"On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis."

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Stealthwatch?

Regarding cost, for the Bangladesh context, Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a little bit high-priced because we are a developing country, making it tough to manage affordable solutions. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Stealthwatch?

Several features often look very promising during evaluation or implementation but end up being used only lightly in day-to-day operations. Advanced reporting and scheduled compliance reports look ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Stealthwatch?

My main use case for Cisco Secure Network Analytics has been network visibility and anomaly-based threat detection within the enterprise environment. In security operations and VAPT-related activit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Vectra AI vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

Nmap vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Cisco Secure Network Analytics

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

NetFort LANGuardian vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 8% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 7% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics

August 2026

Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

July 2026

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure Network Analytics enhances network security through integrated threat detection and detailed traffic visibility, optimizing performance with AI analytics and strong platform integrations.

Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers deep visibility into network traffic, with tools like network maps and server response times. Its AI-driven analytics help detect threats, focusing on east-west traffic. Integration with platforms such as pxGrid and ISE complements its capabilities. Reporting and telemetry help in identifying bandwidth issues, yet improvements are desired in AI for better data organization. Installation complexity and false positives present challenges, and managing network loads effectively is a recognized need.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure Network Analytics?

Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive insights into network traffic and server behavior.
Network Maps: Enhances understanding of traffic flow and infrastructure layout.
AI Analytics: Uses AI for superior threat detection and anomaly recognition.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like pxGrid and ISE for enhanced security management.
Telemetry: Delivers detailed bandwidth usage and traffic analysis reports.

How does Cisco Secure Network Analytics provide value?

Enhanced Security: Elevates threat detection and response capabilities.
Traffic Insights: Identifies encrypted and anomalous network behaviors.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Endpoint Protection: Guards network endpoints against potential threats.

Industries such as banking, defense, and police rely on Cisco Secure Network Analytics for securing networks against threats. Its capability to provide insights into encrypted traffic and facilitate device auditing makes it a sought-after choice for those requiring extensive network visibility. Users appreciate its application for threat prevention and response in demanding sectors.

Cisco

TruView streamlines data analytics by offering comprehensive features that empower users to efficiently manage and interpret large datasets. It is designed for those who seek precision and depth in their analytics tools.

TruView is a versatile analytics tool tailored for expert users who require detailed insights and powerful data processing capabilities. It is crafted to accommodate extensive data volumes, offering flexible integration options and customizable analytics for precise decision-making. TruView is recognized for its speed and accuracy, supporting users in achieving data-driven insights efficiently.

What are the valuable features of TruView?

Advanced Data Processing: Efficiently handles large datasets without compromising speed.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to meet specific analytical needs.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with existing data systems for smoother transitions.
Real-time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights for prompt decision-making.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports for effective data interpretation.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Beneficial return on investment through efficient data management.
User Satisfaction: High ratings for reliability and precision from expert users.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without performance loss.
Improved Decision Making: Facilitates timely and informed business decisions.
Time-Saving: Reduces time spent on data analysis with streamlined processes.

TruView's implementation varies across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it provides tailored solutions to meet sector-specific demands. In finance, it enhances risk assessment and investment strategies. Healthcare facilities leverage it for patient data analytics, while retailers use it to understand consumer behavior and optimize inventory management.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView

August 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.