We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and IronNet Collective Defense Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)."There are already many functionalities, so I don't think there is anything to improve."
"The most valuable part is that Stealthwatch is part of a portfolio of security devices from Cisco. Cisco literally can touch every single end point, every single ingress and egress point in the network. Nobody else has that."
"Overall, the implementation is very good."
"The solution's analytics and thrust detection capabilities are good. We're still adjusting it. It's a little hypersensitive, but it is working right now."
"The fact that it can identify down to an IP address of a system that is causing problems, or potentially causing problems, is very valuable."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has predefined alerts for different types of security issues that might happen in the network. Whether it's PCs or servers that are used for botnets or Bitcoin mining we receive the alerts automatically. This functionality is what we receive from the solution out of the box."
"StealthWatch lets me see the ports running in and out and the country. It has excellent reporting, telemetry, and artificial intelligence features. With the telemetry, I can set thresholds to detect sudden changes and the alarms go through the PLC parts. I can see all the ports running on that trunk."
"The solution has increased our threat detection rate. Cisco Stealthwatch has not reduced our incident response times. It has not reduced the amount of time it takes us to detect immediate threats. It has reduced false positives."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services."
"The visualization could be improved, the GUI is not the best."
"I would like to see interoperability with other Cisco products because we have ThousandEyes, Cisco Prime, and others. The interaction among these is important to us."
"The usability of this solution needs to be improved."
"We've run into some issues with the configuration."
"Better integration between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Cisco Secure Workload would be beneficial."
"It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works."
"There's a lot of traffic on our network that we don't see sometimes."
"I would like to see more expansion in artificial intelligence and machine learning features."
"I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 4th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 57 reviews while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 14th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x).
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors and best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.