We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and Nuage Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The cloud environment, including cloud security integration, is very valuable because of the many API integrations with the SD-WAN."
"It's very easy to manage and monitor the network's health and security using the solution."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The initial setup is quite simple."
"The most useful feature for our organization is the combination of on-prem and cloud-based deployments. We connect securely to our hybrid cloud using transit VPCs and cloud on-ramp for fast deployments."
"The solution's application control and application traffic steering tool are its most valuable aspects in terms of how we utilize the product."
"Customizing SD-WAN is very easy because you can define two colors. You can define two different operators. You can deploy a partial mesh, a full mesh, or hub-and-spoke totally differently. If you want to do this on a DMVPN solution, that's really hard."
"I have found the solution's main features are its ability to be customized, network traffic classification, and has a wide range of features that can be set."
"It is stable and reliable."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is network management. The customer is able to manage their network from home or we can also manage the whole customer network."
"It has good reporting and analytics, that most people can understand without too much difficulty."
"It would be very helpful if we had better access to a knowledge base, or online documentation, to help both us and our customers learn to use this solution."
"The installation is not easy. If you have experience and it is not your first time doing the installation, it can be easier."
"I would like to see revision cycles to be more stable."
"The product's application delivery feature needs improvement."
"We recently found some bugs."
"In the next release, Cisco should focus on simplifying the configuration of SD-WAN. SD-WAN has a lot of room to grow."
"The initial setup is complex and can be improved."
"It would be better if it provided more visibility. At present, we can't troubleshoot in real time."
"The setup can be complex."
"Security is an area that could use some work."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while Nuage Networks is ranked 19th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 4 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Nuage Networks is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nuage Networks writes "Easy to use features, good support, and has the ability to maintain a session when you lose an uplink". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Citrix SD-WAN, whereas Nuage Networks is most compared with Cisco ACI, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN and Meraki SD-WAN.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.