No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Meraki MV vs Haivision Media Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MV
Ranking in Video Management Software
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Haivision Media Platform
Ranking in Video Management Software
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2902473 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer
Integrated IP communication has improved security and performance for enterprise networks
Regarding how Cisco Meraki MV can be improved, I think with the recent advent of AI, adding AI to it to improve thoughtfulness is also something that can help Cisco Meraki MV in terms of features, especially concerning security and countermeasures to give more details about the kind of security breach that can be seen. Regarding Cisco Meraki MV's AI capabilities, I think the governance is good and helpful, but definitely with time, there will be a point where we will want to give some ethics or probably some policies for incidents and risk assessment; so definitely, the capability is awesome for now. Regarding Cisco Meraki MV's AI capabilities, I believe the accuracy is also good and the reliability is fantastic, but I see that with the feedback I gave about improving it, it might also improve the accuracy of Cisco Meraki MV, and possibly add some features to what has been existing before.
Samuelmo - PeerSpot reviewer
Ingeniero de operaciones at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reliable live signal workflows have enabled robust international sports broadcast distribution
The previous versions of Haivision Media Platform were a bit more cumbersome since we have been working with it for more than four years. Currently, Haivision Media Platform is much more updated, much better, and more intuitive with many quite technical options. Haivision Media Platform is very technical and gives very technical parameters that others do not give. It provides a good way to optimize and give good parameters to use. I like Haivision Media Platform because the software manages to use resources effectively according to the actual quality it is giving me. On the technical side, I would like Haivision Media Platform equipment to be a bit more robust. On many of my devices, I have 100 Mbps ports, but I would like them to have 1000 Mbps ports. I would like them to have more capacity because a 100 Mbps port makes me very limited. Regarding Haivision Media Platform improvements, I would like software updates for problem resolution or bug fixes to be more frequent. In the documentation on the website, I would want to have a faster and more accurate way to resolve failures since it becomes cumbersome having to create an account, register, and ask support and have them answer a question that could already be included directly in the documentation to improve and make technical support much faster. An additional improvement necessary for Haivision Media Platform would be for the gateways to add more protocols and improve IGMP, as I have had issues with IGMP for receiving some types of signals, such as UDP. They are a bit finicky for some versions, and I would like it to open up more to additional network protocols like NDI, protocols that are not being accepted so far.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We did have a return on investment, as we saved a lot of time using a centralized system in Cisco Meraki MV, and that's how our investment was returned as saved time."
"In my opinion, Cisco Meraki MV doesn't need improvements; it's a tried and tested, working, excellent product, and even those who don't know it can learn it right away."
"The impact of Cisco Meraki MV on my organization is noticeable because I see the security and robustness of communication during the implementation of all these IPs and other items on Cisco Meraki MV, and the efficiency is better compared to any other product, involving the features and how you can manage the security through the dashboard."
"Cisco Meraki MV positively impacts my organization by providing hardware to connect employees wirelessly to the network, allowing for mostly stable connections, and facilitating straightforward remote access to the Cisco Meraki MV user interface for maintenance."
"We have always used many solutions, including Kiloview and ATEM, which is a French company, but of all of them, Haivision Media Platform has been our number one for rediffusion, transmission, and broadcast because of its ease, compatibility, and reliability."
"Haivision Media Platform has positively impacted my organization because it is a great solution."
 

Cons

"I have not automatically saved money with Cisco Meraki MV; in terms of employees, we still maintain the number of employees that we have."
"Initially, I had issues finding features and configurations with Cisco Meraki MV, so I think having an AI assistant would be a good improvement for user interactions, enabling direct queries about feature locations and configurations instead of relying solely on internet searches."
"On the technical side, I would like Haivision Media Platform equipment to be a bit more robust."
"I am facing an issue with customer support because there is no support in India, so we have to call people outside of India."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Video Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Haivision Media Platform?
The previous versions of Haivision Media Platform were a bit more cumbersome since we have been working with it for more than four years. Currently, Haivision Media Platform is much more updated, m...
What is your primary use case for Haivision Media Platform?
My main use case for Haivision Media Platform is receiving signals in SRT, in HLS, in different network protocols and forwarding them in order to do a distribution and retransmission of my signals ...
What advice do you have for others considering Haivision Media Platform?
I would rate Haivision Media Platform at nine points. I give it a nine because in terms of encoding, broadcast, sending, and receiving signals, they have been the best equipment I have worked with....
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MV vs. Haivision Media Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.