"I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module."
"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."
"The product has good integration."
"It can monitor, get the data, and then report on the data."
"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."
"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."
"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."
"The deployment can be quite complex."
Cisco Intersight is ranked 30th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 3 reviews while Splunk Insights for Infrastructure is ranked 50th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Cisco Intersight is rated 8.0, while Splunk Insights for Infrastructure is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Intersight writes "Scalable and easy to set up portfolio of services; good for remote device management and other functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Insights for Infrastructure writes "Good monitoring and reporting tools with useful dashboards". Cisco Intersight is most compared with Cisco UCS Manager, Cisco UCS Director, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), HPE OneView and Dell CloudIQ, whereas Splunk Insights for Infrastructure is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, BMC TrueSight Operations Management, VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront, ServiceNow IT Operations Management and Datadog.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
