Cisco Intersight vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while ManageEngine is ranked #71. Cisco holds a 1.6% mindshare in IM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 22 Cisco Intersight reviews

7,703 Views
5,392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

3,690 Views
1,587 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Cisco Intersight are competitors in the IT management solutions space. Cisco Intersight tends to have the upper hand for larger enterprises due to its comprehensive features, while ManageEngine IT360 offers a cost-effective option for smaller businesses.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 offers integrated IT management, such as network, server, and application monitoring. It is suited for centralized IT operations and offers cost benefits. Cisco Intersight provides advanced automation, analytics, and enhanced cloud infrastructure management. Its features cater to organizations seeking detailed insights and automated operations.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could enhance its cloud support and advanced analytics capabilities, and offer more flexible deployment options. Cisco Intersight could benefit from streamlining its learning curve, reducing its initial cost barrier, and expanding on-premise options for diverse infrastructure requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 provides a straightforward deployment process with accessible on-premise options and solid customer support. Cisco Intersight offers a cloud-native deployment model that emphasizes quick setup and scalability, though it may require a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 is a cost-effective choice with lower initial setup costs, offering substantial returns for smaller IT environments. Cisco Intersight, despite a higher initial cost, provides significant ROI through scalability and efficiency in larger environments, with enhanced long-term operational savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (5th)

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (85th), IT Asset Management (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Intersight	1.6%
ManageEngine IT360	0.6%
Other	97.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AbhinavSingh

Technical Marketing Engineer Hybrid Cloud Infrastructures at NetApp

Centralized policies have simplified hybrid operations and now support automated workflows

The challenge could be if there are any bugs. Most of the time, you may feel that the TCAM resources are getting full on the Nexus just because of some bug or the configuration is not supported. Or sometimes, if there are any vulnerabilities happening on the current running firmware, those are challenges we have. And if you talk about from the compute side, there were initial bugs such as a CPU throttle issue. Because of that, the chassis was not running in an optimum way. You may see performance issues during that time. For that, Cisco released a patch, and it got fixed. I think Cisco Intersight should allow more automation capabilities. It should be more open, and it should provide more automation capabilities. I think there is also a scope of making it a little bit simpler because a lot of policy and config sometimes becomes confusing for the user because it has a lot of config. Maybe they can do a little bit of simplification with Cisco Intersight.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Intersight makes onboarding much easier; it provides comprehensive hardware monitoring, firmware management, proactive alerts, server inventory, UCS configurations, service profiles for compliance, support integration, automation capabilities, and it offers multi-site visibility with cloud-based access that simplifies management."

"Cisco Intersight has positively impacted my organization by making it a lot quicker to diagnose or foresee problems that might be coming up, and since it is a technology that is at the heart of our infrastructure, it helps us feel safe."

"What I like best about Cisco Intersight is the way it's developing and converging into everything that the cloud has to offer, e.g. it's converging into one platform which is good."

"The most valuable features I find in Cisco Intersight include the fact that it's a cloud-managed solution, which automates the process when a part on the server goes faulty, for example, if you have a module that goes faulty, automatically a TAC case opens at the Cisco level, and everything is automated, meaning there's no need to check for this."

"Intersight offers many features that provide great value to companies."

"Overall, I rate Cisco Intersight a ten out of ten."

"The tool helps to manage Cisco servers."

"What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"All I know is that when it comes to managing the active directory, ManageEngine is something I consider to be the best."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"I would suggest you use this product as it's easy for administration, and is based on distributed model support."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The technical support is good."

"The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training."

"Customer Service: Absolutely fantastic."

"The primary use case of this solution is to manage and to protect the web servers, the mail server, and the website in my company."

Cons

"I believe Cisco Intersight's licensing is quite expensive for a public healthcare environment, and I would like to see lower prices for us."

"It's a very complex solution."

"There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment."

"I would like AI to be more integrated into Cisco Intersight."

"Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed."

"Technical support from Cisco has been mixed. For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX."

"I do not have notes for improvement."

"Cisco Intersight is a stable product, but it needs some improvement."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"This is because of the lack of available technical knowledge in terms of competence and maximizing the power of the product."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"The GUI could be improved."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"ManageEngine needs to fix the downtime scheduler for SNMP monitored devices. Alarms are still generated for the devices placed into scheduled maintenance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"The product is cost-effective."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

28%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed. At the moment it does have a basic integration of Pure Storage, so I can add my Pure Storage if I ha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

My main use case for Cisco Intersight is to register our Cisco UCS servers and apply profiles to our servers with configurations, firmware deployment automatically, and install the operating system...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Intersight?

I would rate Cisco Intersight a nine out of ten. I give it a nine because personally, I think it is one of the best management tools ever. I have worked before with different server vendors and dif...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 39% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco UCS Director vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

Zabbix vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 7% of the time

USU Valuemation vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

October 2026

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

Intersight

IT360

Overview

Cisco Intersight delivers advanced data center management with cloud integration, remote server scaling, and predictive analytics, promoting efficient infrastructure management. It supports hybrid environments and is suitable for scaling across enterprises.

Cisco Intersight offers a comprehensive view of data centers with seamless cloud platform integration, enhancing manageability across environments. It is known for workflow automation, inventory management, and predictive analysis, allowing users to optimize workloads. Users leverage its scalability and ease of use, with features that aid in remote management and integration with both Cisco and non-Cisco products. However, improvements are needed in usability, automation, and third-party tool integration, especially for on-premises and hybrid cloud management. Users often face challenges with firmware management and transitioning from UCS Manager. Desired enhancements include better software compatibility, third-party integrations, expanded microservices support, enhanced AI features, and more automation capabilities, addressing setup complexity, support, and high maintenance costs.

What are the main features of Cisco Intersight?

Data Center Management: Provides insights into data centers with comprehensive monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Enables integration with cloud platforms for enhanced workflows.
Remote Management: Facilitates remote management of data center environments.
Predictive Analytics: Offers analysis tools for workload optimization and planning.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with enterprise infrastructure needs.

What are the expected benefits of using Cisco Intersight?

Improved Infrastructure Management: Offers tools for efficient management across environments.
Enhanced Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automation capabilities.
Cost-Effective Operations: Promotes efficiency and reduces maintenance costs.
Comprehensive Integration: Supports seamless integration with diverse platforms and technologies.
Performance Optimization: Utilizes predictive analytics for optimizing system performance.

In industries where data center management and integration are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Cisco Intersight is used to monitor and manage infrastructure across multiple sites. Its capability to combine platforms like HyperFlex and VMware allows organizations to maintain hardware status effectively, supporting both on-premises and cloud environments for efficient service delivery.

Cisco

ManageEngine IT360 is a comprehensive tool crafted for IT management, offering a robust framework to monitor and manage network infrastructure efficiently.

Designed for IT professionals, ManageEngine IT360 integrates IT management and network monitoring, offering seamless oversight of an organization's entire IT framework. Users gain insights into performance, data flow, and bottlenecks, assisting in maintaining optimal infrastructure efficiency. It provides actionable intelligence to support informed decision-making.

What are the key features of ManageEngine IT360?

Comprehensive Network Monitoring: Provides detailed metrics for tracking and maintaining network performance.
Fault Management: Quickly identifies issues for prompt resolution, minimizing downtime.
Performance Management: Continuously evaluates system performance to ensure IT assets are operating as expected.
Help Desk Integration: Facilitates streamlined support processes through seamless module integration.
Server Monitoring: Delivers insights into server health and performance metrics, aiding in proactive management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating ManageEngine IT360?

Cost Efficiency: Provides comprehensive management tools reducing the need for multiple software investments.
Productivity Enhancement: Minimizes downtime improving productivity across IT teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers real-time data aiding strategic infrastructure planning.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing IT requirements, ensuring long-term solution viability.

ManageEngine IT360 finds its application across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In finance, it enhances data security and network reliability, critical for transactional integrity. Healthcare sectors use it to ensure system uptime crucial for patient management systems. Manufacturing sectors rely on it for uninterrupted operations, ensuring system efficiencies align with production demands.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.