Cisco Duo vs Silverfort comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Duo
Ranking in Authentication Systems
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (4th), Cisco Security Portfolio (8th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (1st)
Silverfort
Ranking in Authentication Systems
22nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Privileged Access Management (PAM) (32nd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (24th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Cisco Duo is 14.4%, down from 16.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Silverfort is 2.3%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
Unique Categories:
Single Sign-On (SSO)
9.5%
ZTNA as a Service
3.2%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
0.8%
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
0.6%
 

Featured Reviews

Mike Krueger - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 15, 2023
Saves us time, establishes trust, and prevents phishing
We utilize Duo Security to mitigate phishing and other similar attack vectors in general Our phishing attacks have significantly decreased. The number of compromises is almost nonexistent due to the implementation of Duo Security. Duo Security's self-service portal has definitely helped us save a…
Use Silverfort?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't seen it in a while, but it's at par with everything else licensing-wise."
"The pricing is pretty competitive. It's pretty cheap. Anybody can adopt it."
"Cisco has the most expensive products because market leaders tend to charge a lot."
"I am not aware of the pricing. There are two departments, and I don't have any information about them."
"I only need the solution for IT staff, which makes it relatively cheap. If I deployed it for the whole company, it would be costly, so it depends on the number of users. Duo Security is affordable compared to other products in the segment."
"I believe the licensing model is excellent as it offers flexibility to our customers, allowing them to adopt a crawl, walk, or run approach."
"The licensing is very good because it does not cost a lot of money. It's affordable for all-sized customers, including enterprises. There is an additional cost for premium support."
"Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
27%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?
We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...
What do you like most about Duo Security?
They are users who, as mentioned before, utilize RDPAP and MDPAP. It includes functionalities related to finance, specifically in single sign-on.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Duo Security
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Singtel, Egan, Agilisys, Reliance Worldwide Corporation, Indosat, ZOL Hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.