IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CircleCI Logo
1,754 views|1,598 comparisons
GitLab Logo
14,386 views|12,758 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2022.
595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

More CircleCI Pros →

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints.""Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with.""CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use.""I have had no problem with the stability of the solution.""It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient.""We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people.""GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable.""The stability is good."

More GitLab Pros →

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

More CircleCI Cons →

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain.""I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version.""The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation.""Reporting could be improved.""It can be free for commercial use.""I would like to see better integration with project management tools such as Jira.""I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors.""In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents."

More GitLab Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
  • More CircleCI Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications.
    Top Answer: 
    The price of CircleCI could be less expensive.
    Top Answer: 
    There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI.
    Top Answer: 
    I don't deal with any licensing aspects of the solution. I can't speak about the exact costs.
    Top Answer: 
    We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem. There needs to be better and native integration. That is really useful for us as Atlassian Jira has strong integration with Bitbucket… more »
    out of 34 in Build Automation
    Average Words per Review
    out of 34 in Build Automation
    Average Words per Review
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    GoCD logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Oracle Hudson CI logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Learn More
    CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.

    GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

    Learn more about CircleCI
    Learn more about GitLab
    Sample Customers
    Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
    Siemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, Vaadin
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Educational Organization5%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Mining And Metals Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2022.
    595,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CircleCI is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review while GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 18 reviews. CircleCI is rated 8.0, while GitLab is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CircleCI writes "Beneficial automation workflow and valuable application standardization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". CircleCI is most compared with AWS CodePipeline, Tekton, GoCD, Harness and Oracle Hudson CI, whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TeamCity, Tekton, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and AWS CodePipeline.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.