Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cincom CPQSync vs Oracle E-Business Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cincom CPQSync
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
156
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (1st), ERP (4th), Activity Based Costing Software (2nd), Benefits Administration (6th), Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Cincom CPQSync is 2.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 4.5%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle E-Business Suite4.5%
Cincom CPQSync2.6%
Other92.9%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cincom CPQSync?
Leave a review
Md. Mazharul Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Incharge Corporate Accounts & ERP System at General Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Has connected financial data across departments and improved future cash flow planning
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be connected to the finance module, and I think Oracle provides the right solution. Also, SAP, IFS, or Microsoft Dynamics 365 offer some solutions, but I am not as happy with them as I am with Oracle. I believe that Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by transitioning from Java-based scripts in our system to a web-based environment. While Oracle already has JD Edwards available in web-based format, I think it needs to be smoother for optimization and presentation in the future. In comparison, IFS is fully web-based, and all applications are sufficiently good and user-friendly. We are developing and trying to improve to a web-based setup, but it is currently too costly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business43
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise113
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle E-Business Suite?
It was very easy to integrate the product into our existing infrastructure.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
I find the pricing is not ideal for a smaller organization right now.
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be...
 

Also Known As

Acquire, Cincom Acquire
Oracle EBS, OEBS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Air Products and Chemicals Inc., Bartec Technor, Carrier, Dayton Progress, E-ONE, Fassi Cranes, Global Provider of Power Protection Systems, Greenheck Fan Corporation, PANalytical, Plantronics, Siemens
Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding
Find out what your peers are saying about Infor CloudSuite vs. Oracle E-Business Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.