Checkmk vs Tanium comparison

Checkmk and Tanium are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Checkmk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tanium is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmk holds a 10.5% mindshare in SM, compared to Tanium’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Tanium users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,453 Views
2,494 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tanium

Read 17 Tanium reviews

10,883 Views
1,959 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Checkmk

Tanium

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Tanium and Checkmk are both prominent tools in the IT operations and security space. Tanium has the upper hand in threat detection, while Checkmk stands out in monitoring capabilities.

Features: Tanium's threat detection, incident response, and endpoint management stand out. Checkmk is highlighted for its detailed monitoring abilities, scalability, and integration options.

Room for Improvement: Tanium could enhance its reporting and data visualization. Checkmk would benefit from a more modern design, better integration with other tools, and deeper integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tanium's deployment is relatively straightforward but often requires extensive configuration, with highly rated customer service. Checkmk's deployment is user-friendly and easy to use, but customer support is an area for potential growth.

Pricing and ROI: Tanium has a higher setup cost with a solid ROI due to its security features. Checkmk offers a cost-effective setup with quick ROI because of its scalability and monitoring efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. Tanium Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Tanium

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Server Monitoring

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

Tanium

Ranking in Server Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (24th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 10.5%, up from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tanium is 5.6%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Checkmk	10.5%
Tanium	5.6%
Other	83.9%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

NitinKushwaha

Product Manager at OakNorth

Stable product with an ability to build complex roles

We use Tanium as an EDR solution for managing end-user devices and servers The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors. Tanium's dashboard UI could be similar to CrowdStrike. We have been using Tanium for two and a half years. The product is stable. I rate…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

More Checkmk pros

"I like the tool's incident response and security patching."

"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."

"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."

"When I push a quick update, it's done right away, and I can rescan immediately to confirm completion within minutes."

"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."

"Tanium's most valuable feature is its instant discovery aspect."

"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."

"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."

More Tanium pros

Cons

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

More Checkmk cons

"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."

"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."

"The main issues are the network connection because different customers have issues with their networks. It's difficult implementing this type of solution because the network is the main feature in the architecture for these types of solutions. Tanium could improve by creating some network optimization."

"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."

"The solution can give a lot of false positives."

"The solution lacks mobility."

"The solution needs to improve the reporting and tracking capabilities."

"It is not really additional functions, or the features that are needed, rather the complexity would be reduced based on the number of modules required to put together a comprehensive operational security and risk compliance model."

More Tanium cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"The solution offers value for money."

"It's an expensive solution. It would be nice if the cost were lower."

"It is higher than some competitors in the market."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"The product's pricing differs from region to region depending on negotiations and the number of endpoints."

"The solution is expensive but it's a good investment."

"Tanium is a more expensive solution in Latin America than some of the competitors, such as BigFix."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tanium?

The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tanium?

While there is always room for improvement, I am pleased with Tanium.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tanium?

The primary use case for Tanium ( /products/tanium-reviews ) is compliance, patching, and inventory as part of the core functions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 42% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tanium

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tanium

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tanium

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Discovery vs Tanium

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs Tanium

Compared 5% of the time

More Tanium Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

September 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

Tanium

August 2025

Download Tanium product report

Overview

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Tanium

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Tanium

September 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. Tanium

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Tanium and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. Tanium report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.