Checkmk vs Entuity comparison

Checkmk and Park Place Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while Park Place Technologies is ranked #42 with an average rating of 9.0. Checkmk holds a 3.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Park Place Technologies’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Park Place Technologies users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,470 Views
3,800 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

1,051 Views
956 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmk

Entuity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Entuity and Checkmk are competitive solutions in network management and monitoring. Entuity appears stronger due to its sophisticated analytics capabilities, while Checkmk appeals with its extensive monitoring features.

Features: Entuity offers comprehensive network discovery, real-time analytics, and intuitive reporting tools enhancing asset management capabilities. Checkmk provides broad compatibility, customizable architecture, and robust performance monitoring, attracting users needing versatile integrations.

Room for Improvement: Entuity could improve in areas like expanding its integration options, enhancing customization features, and simplifying advanced analytics tools for non-technical users. Checkmk may focus on streamlining its configuration process, enhancing the user interface for greater accessibility, and providing more out-of-the-box templates to reduce setup time.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entuity typically offers a smoother deployment experience with reliable onboarding and support, minimizing downtime during implementation. Checkmk, while requiring more configuration, provides an extensive knowledge base and community support, suited for technically adept teams requiring a customizable setup for complex infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Entuity offers a flexible licensing model considered fair for mid-sized to large enterprises, delivering ROI through enhanced network performance despite a higher initial cost. Checkmk offers competitive pricing attractive to small and medium-sized businesses seeking cost-effective monitoring solutions with significant value, prioritizing a flexible and comprehensive monitoring scope.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. Entuity Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Entuity

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

More Checkmk pros

"This is a product that is easy to deploy and maintain with a positive end-user experience."

"Entuity's best feature is its ability to monitor a large number of devices."

"The setup was very simple and took about an hour."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"I particularly like the theme and the dashboard that they have brought in this version. In the previous version, there was only a simple screen. There wasn't any dashboard. It was a simple view, but now, they have brought in a dashboard that gives the fields for the ops as well. They can get the data they want to see in a single place."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"One of the most valuable features of Entuity is the user interface."

More Entuity pros

Cons

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

More Checkmk cons

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"Entuity can expand its coverage on monitoring VoIP solutions a little bit more."

"If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"It should support IPAM or IP Address Management. When it comes to the network, IP Address Management is a feature for which we have to use a different solution. When we are managing networks, if IPAM also becomes a part of this, we do not have to look for a separate solution."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

More Entuity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The product is affordable."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about Entuity?

Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Entuity?

We work with other solutions. We have a very good relationship with Entuity Commercial. You can negotiate discounts and provide better proposals to our customers. The pricing is very competitive. T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entuity?

Entuity could integrate with other solutions and collect more information from IoT devices.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 42% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 46% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 12% of the time

Motadata Network Management System vs Entuity

Compared 9% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Entuity

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Entuity

Compared 7% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

August 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

August 2025

Download Entuity product report

Overview

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

Entuity network management software continually monitors network bandwidth, network error rate and network congestion, which are all factors that impact overall network throughput. Events can be raised in response to abnormal traffic to allow remedial action before users are impacted. The Entuity network monitor continually evaluates network latency and network jitter to calculate MOS and ICPIF scores. Events can be raised when these scores are unacceptable for business application, voice and video performance. Key Features include: Root Cause Analysis, Event Management, Flow Monitoring & Analysis, Application Path Monitoring and Network Performance Monitoring.

Park Place Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. Entuity

July 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. Entuity

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. Entuity and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. Entuity report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.