Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,347 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development security industry. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities with third-party tools and version control functionalities, which are key strengths in a collaborative development environment.

Features: Checkmarx One is equipped with a range of tools for identifying code vulnerabilities, such as SAST and application tracking, along with incremental scanning capabilities and support for multiple languages. GitHub is known for its version control capabilities, seamless third-party tool integration, and project organization features. It also benefits from its open-source nature, which encourages community-driven innovation.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from reducing false positives and expanding language support. Additionally, enhancing its user interface and exploring more flexible pricing models would be advantageous. GitHub could improve user-friendliness, particularly in handling code conflicts, and enhance support documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds but receives mixed feedback on technical support, highlighting a need for quicker resolutions. GitHub efficiently deploys on public and hybrid clouds with a straightforward setup, often requiring minimal customer service due to its user-friendly nature and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is priced as a premium product, which reflects its extensive security offerings and generally results in a favorable ROI through improved security and development cycles. GitHub offers cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free tier for open-source projects, and its competitive pricing makes it accessible for wider use while maintaining a collaborative, secure environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

April 2025

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (24th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to track the vulnerabilities inside the code (origin and destination of weak variables or functions)."

"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."

"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."

"The user interface is modern and nice to use."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It is really simple to set up."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"We can make a private repository."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"The initial setup was easy."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."

"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."

"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."

"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."

More Checkmarx One cons

"When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 39% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Checkmarx One product report

Checkmarx One

May 2025

Download GitHub product report

April 2025

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent