We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Fortinet FortiDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."
"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"It allows me to see all the traffic on my network."
"I find the interface easy to use."
"The solution is very user-friendly and very easy to use."
"The product allows the users to adjust the thresholds."
"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."
"We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."
"The solution already has security profiles and it can protect from DDoS attacks and other kinds of attacks."
"This solution can protect Layer 3, Layer 4 and Layer 7 attacks of applications for us."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"I would like to see analytics, big data."
"The web interface could be much better."
"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."
"The primary area for improvement is the on-premises capacity limit, currently fixed at 10 GB."
"The only thing they need to do is to automate it. Today, you must create tools that do not require the use of an expert or anyone with special skills."
"The solution can be a little more user-friendly and it can be more affordable."
"I find that there have been issues in the past year with the solution hanging. It freezes often."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Fortinet FortiDDoS is ranked 16th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Fortinet FortiDDoS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiDDoS writes "Offers good technical support but has poor scalability". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Fortinet FortiDDoS is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiWeb and Edgio Global CDN.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
