Checkmarx One vs Cyera comparison

Read 4 Cyera reviews

10,071 Views
2,518 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Cyera based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Cyera Report (Updated: June 2026).

Checkmarx One vs. Cyera

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in AI Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (15th), Container Security (14th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (11th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)

Cyera

Ranking in AI Security

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), Data Governance (23rd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (9th), AI Data Analysis (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.5%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cyera is 1.4%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	1.5%
Cyera	1.4%
Other	97.1%

AI Security

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

reviewer2795301

Vice President, Compliance at a manufacturing company with 1-10 employees

Data discovery has accelerated and now drives faster classification and compliance mapping

The best features Cyera offers include agentless discovery and sampling as well as AI ML-based classifications. I find myself relying on the sampling the most, which makes everything really fast, but also the auto-classification and ML-based functionalities. The main thing that stands out to me and my team about the features is the speed of integration and how fast it does the discovery on the data. Once it discovers the data, it also maps it back to a ton of compliance frameworks and best practices that I can use to operationalize. Cyera has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to identify the highest risk areas but also provide better classification of data, which then leads to better data pillar maturity. Cyera has accomplished all three outcomes: saving time, reducing risk, and improving compliance scores, as the speed at which it discovers data was significantly faster.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were using HPE Security Fortify to scan code for security vulnerabilities, but it can scan only after a successful compile, and if the code has dependencies or build errors the scan fails, while with Checkmarx pre-compile scanning is seamless and allows us to scan more code."

"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use, as it's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

"Vulnerability details is valuable."

"We have used this product to verify the dev department's code in order to minimize security holes."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"It is a stable product."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Cyera has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to identify the highest risk areas but also provide better classification of data, which then leads to better data pillar maturity."

"Cyera has an inbuilt set of policies implemented towards data security, especially cohering with Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)."

"The data discovery, data classification, and CSPM features are most valuable."

"I like how they model the data. They find data in different places that we didn't know, and they can give us a good idea if it's sensitive or not. They understand whether or not something is in the right region because, with the cloud posture management tool, we could see certain things in the infrastructure, but the way they dig into the data is what we like."

Cons

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"We felt like we were the extended quality organization for Checkmarx as they frequently released poor quality patches that broke the existing functionality."

"Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context."

"Presently they support micro-services, but the supporting methodology of the micro-services is not good enough at the moment."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

More Checkmarx One cons

"They need to add a few things in the UI from an enterprise perspective. It's more along the lines of being able to self-service, have integrations, build alerts, and things like that. Outside of that, they work with us on the API and getting alerts into our SIEM and things like that. There's always a way to do something, and they're always available, which is nice."

"As a startup company, there is a long way for them to go in terms of scalability."

"The licensing initially was tricky because it is based on storage as well as user count."

"There is room for improvement in making Cyera more user-friendly. Some parts were difficult to navigate, especially for those new to the IT industry."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"I don't know how much exactly it costs, but I know that it's a yearly thing. It's something that will cost money for any company because they're storing all this information. They're doing all this machine learning, and there are a lot of services on their backend that they got to pay for. I'm sure it gets translated back to the customers unless you have everything completely on-prem. If you're not doing much in the cloud, then I could see how it'd be cheaper, but if you have anything that's cloud-hosted and does all the work for you, there's going to be a cost associated with it."

"Compared to the competitors, they are very reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cyera ?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cyera was that the licensing initially was tricky because it is based on storage as well as user count. I use Cyera to actually identify ho...

What needs improvement with Cyera ?

I think the area for improvement in Cyera is probably around integration, particularly with other platforms and third-party tools. For example, I see some integration areas with leading DLP solutio...

What is your primary use case for Cyera ?

My main use case for Cyera includes data visibility, data tagging, data classification, AI assessments, and policy governance, risk, and compliance policy. For data classification, I import structu...

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Cyera

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Cyera

Compared 10% of the time

BigID Next vs Cyera

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Cyera

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Cyera

Compared 4% of the time

More Cyera Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download Cyera product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Cyera transforms data security by offering a comprehensive approach to defend sensitive information across cloud-native environments.

Cyera provides a robust data security solution designed to address the increasing challenges associated with managing and protecting sensitive information in cloud-native frameworks. It empowers businesses to gain visibility and control over their data across various cloud services, enhancing compliance and reducing risk. With its advanced analytics and seamless integration capabilities, Cyera ensures that enterprises can effectively secure their critical data without compromising operational efficiency.

What are Cyera's most important features?

Data Discovery: Automatically identifies and classifies sensitive data across cloud environments.
Risk Analysis: Offers real-time insights into data vulnerabilities to prioritize security efforts.
Compliance Assurance: Simplifies compliance reporting and ensures adherence to regulatory standards.
Incident Response: Provides tools for swift incident detection and response to mitigate potential breaches.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates within existing security frameworks to enhance data protection.

What are the benefits or ROI of using Cyera?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances data protection strategies, reducing the likelihood of breaches.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines security processes, leading to reduced operational expenses.
Regulatory Compliance: Reduces costs associated with compliance efforts and potential fines.
Operational Continuity: Ensures business processes run smoothly without data security interruptions.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth and increasing data management needs.

Cyera is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, providing tailored data security solutions that address sector-specific threats and compliance requirements. These industries benefit from Cyera's capabilities in safeguarding financial transactions, protecting patient records, and securing customer data, respectively. By adapting to each industry's unique demands, Cyera helps maintain trust and protect critical information assets.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Cyera's customers include the Chicago Board of Options Exchange (Cboe), Granicus, Takeda, LifeLabs, United Talent Agency, ACV Auctions, and Armis

Checkmarx One vs. Cyera