Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Proofpoint are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Proofpoint is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.0% mindshare in DLP, compared to Proofpoint’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Proofpoint users who would recommend it.

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Read 81 Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) reviews

12,844 Views
2,440 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Proofpoint Email Data Loss ...

Read 3 Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews

1,723 Views
1,706 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Proofpoint Email Data Loss ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2026

Check Point WAF and Proofpoint Email DLP are both leaders in the cybersecurity industry, with Check Point specializing in web application security and Proofpoint focusing on email data breach prevention. Based on our data comparisons, Proofpoint Email DLP stands out with its superior features and comprehensive functionality, while Check Point WAF offers more competitive pricing and faster response times.

Features: Check Point WAF provides robust threat intelligence, real-time attack prevention, and a user-friendly configuration. Proofpoint Email DLP emphasizes advanced data classification, comprehensive email monitoring, and policy enforcement capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF offers a streamlined cloud-based deployment with responsive customer service. Proofpoint Email DLP also provides ease of deployment with strong documentation and support for complex data protection needs.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF presents a competitive pricing model with lower initial setup costs. Proofpoint Email DLP requires a higher upfront investment but demonstrates substantial ROI through its security and data loss prevention capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (4th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Proofpoint Email Data Loss ...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	1.0%
Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Kamalesh Tripathi

Head Of Information Technology at IndoStar Capital Finance Ltd

Email protection has improved and now prevents sensitive data loss with accurate detection

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) has Email DLP, and its Threat Intelligence is highly appreciated. It supports anti-spam solutions and has an inbuilt DMARC solution, which enhances its capabilities effectively. Additionally, with the help of machine learning and artificial intelligence, Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can categorize and manage sensitive data, minimizing false positives and enhancing user experience greatly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) has positively impacted my organization by reducing rule maintenance, leading to less or near-zero false positives, and enabling frictionless DevSecOps alignment."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF delivers clear efficiency gains over traditional WAFs in three main areas: operations, accuracy, and cost optimization."

"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."

"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."

"The best features Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) offers in my experience are deployment, reliability, and scalability, and it has positively impacted my organization as a money saver and time saver by providing proper responses within 10 to 20 seconds, resolving queries quickly with excellent accuracy and reliability from its AI capabilities."

"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."

"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is very good."

"We have too many features included in the solution. These include third-party malware detection as a primary feature and a secondary feature focused on dealing with various security threats."

"Proofpoint offers flexibility in licensing, accommodating various levels from small businesses to governments."

Cons

"As a reseller, the most difficult part is the lack of awareness."

"Regarding the false positive rate, we need to configure it according to our environment because unless we configure it according to our environment, it's a tedious process, particularly with Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), and sometimes if it's not configured properly, there are more than 60% of false positives that we receive."

"The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better."

"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."

"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."

"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."

"There needs to be better security around API integration."

"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"It is difficult to meet the European security compliancy regulations using Proofpoint since it is very focused on the American market, differing significantly from European policies."

"The tool is expensive."

"Cost should reduce so that people can use it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	57
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	40

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

It was equivalent in cost compared to other solutions. However, technically it far superior product. worth investing little more for better solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Cost should reduce so that people can use it. It is very expensive compared to other competitors, and the pricing is a little higher. Local channel partners would be beneficial to have available.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

We are an end user.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 22% of the time

Material Data Protection vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 18% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 9% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 5% of the time

More Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

October 2026

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Download Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive corporate data by monitoring, detecting, and preventing email data breaches. It leverages advanced policies and real-time monitoring to ensure compliance and reduce risks effectively.

Proofpoint Email DLP addresses critical enterprise needs by safeguarding against email data leaks with comprehensive policy frameworks and intelligent monitoring capabilities. It offers customizable templates for various compliance standards, aiding IT departments in maintaining data security without complicating internal processes. Implementing Proofpoint Email DLP enhances data protection strategies and minimizes the risk of accidental leaks.

What are the key features of Proofpoint Email DLP?

Policy Frameworks: Pre-configured and customizable templates for regulatory compliance.
Real-Time Monitoring: Instantly detects and addresses potential data violations as emails are processed.
Incident Management: Provides detailed reports for quick investigation and resolution.
Integration: Easily integrates with other security systems to offer comprehensive data protection.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Data Security Enhancement: Reduces data breach risks through proactive monitoring and policies.
Compliance Support: Ensures adherence to industry standards with customizable policy templates.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines incident management, reducing response time and resource allocation.
Risk Mitigation: Minimizes accidental data leaks, safeguarding company reputation.

In industries like finance and healthcare, where data sensitivity is paramount, Proofpoint Email DLP is commonly implemented. These sectors benefit significantly due to its robust compliance features, enabling firms to protect client data and meet stringent regulatory requirements efficiently.

Proofpoint

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.