Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Fortinet FortiCWP comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
88
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (4th)
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Cloud and Data Center Security (8th), Container Management (7th), Container Security (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (4th), Compliance Management (3rd)
Fortinet FortiCWP
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

SA
May 31, 2024
Gives us better visibility into our resources and enables faster resolution
The detection time could be better. It takes a long time to scan. I'm not sure how long other tools take for the same amount of scanning, so I cannot compare it with other tools, but it takes us half a day to a full day to complete the scan. I want to get the reports faster so we can start fixing the problems. The proof of exploitability is another area for improvement. While I have all the information to troubleshoot the problem, it isn't detailed enough for an administrator. It has sufficient information for a general user, but an administrator would like to know all the ins and outs of the vulnerabilities that have been reported. I would like to see the map feature improve. It's good, but it isn't fully developed. It lets us use custom resources and policies but does not allow us to perform some actions. I would also like more custom integration and runtime security for Kubernetes.
JA
Apr 26, 2024
Robust security, competitive price, and easy to deploy and administer
We are using CloudGuard CNAPP for cloud-native application protection, real-time threat detection, and unified security across multi-cloud environments. Our organization is dependent on this solution for any kind of threat detection and security vulnerabilities in our cloud-based environment. CloudGuard CNAPP's Cloud Security Posture Management capabilities work fine. I have not found any issues with them. They help in identifying misconfiguration, but there can be advanced configuration and features, automation of security traces, and more user-friendly reports. Cloud Security Posture Management is effective for providing compliance rulesets and security best practices. It works fine. It is fully capable. It is a Check Point product. Cloud Security Posture Management identifies the risks that are most critical to our business. It also helps to mitigate those risks. It is very capable of identifying challenges, vulnerabilities, and security threats. Reports are very user-friendly, but in some cases, the reports cannot be fully analyzed by our technical team due to some complexities. Overall, the solution is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten. The time savings in identifying the most critical risks vary. If a security threat is of high severity, it can take 24 to 48 hours. In some cases, it can be resolved on a real-time basis. We use CloudGuard CNAPP's CloudGuard Workload Protection capabilities. We have VMs. We have containers. We have BLOBs. CloudGuard CNAPP is fully capable because it focuses on cloud-native applications. It is capable of identifying all the vulnerabilities. The scanning provided by CloudGuard Workload Protection helps us identify problems before they go live. This identification is very important. It helps us identify threats that are already there. It helps in getting more clarity about security threats and vulnerabilities before they go into production.
Use Fortinet FortiCWP?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We found it to be fine for us. Its price was competitive. It was something we were happy with. We are not a Fortune 500 company, so I do not know how pricing scales at the top end, but for our cloud environment, it works very well."
"It is cheap."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"PingSafe falls somewhere in the middle price range, neither particularly cheap nor expensive."
"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."
"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is always known as a good solution but an expensive one. When you're using Cisco, Check Point, or Palo Alto, you know that you will pay more, but you know that it will work."
"In the beginning, the price of Dome9 was cheap, whereas now it is not."
"Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is expensive."
"Right now, we have licenses on 500 machines, and they are not cheap."
"The price is on the higher end."
"The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter."
"From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive."
"The license fee is high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Security Firm
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
I am personally not taking care of the pricing part, but when we moved from CrowdStrike to Singularity Cloud Native S...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
They can provide some kind of alert when a new type of risk is there. There can be a specific type of alert showing t...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Dome9, Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection, Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence
FortiCWP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners
Carvalho, Autodesk, Shipserv, Security7 Networks, Coopenae
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: September 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.