Celonis vs Couchbase Capella comparison

Celonis and Couchbase are both solutions in the AI Data Analysis category. Celonis is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Couchbase is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5. Celonis holds a 0.5% mindshare in ADA, compared to Couchbase’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Celonis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Couchbase users who would recommend it.

Celonis

Read 60 Celonis reviews

6,318 Views
126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Couchbase Capella

Read 2 Couchbase Capella reviews

463 Views
157 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Celonis

Couchbase Capella

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Celonis and Couchbase Capella based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AI Data Analysis solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celonis

Ranking in AI Data Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Mining (2nd)

Couchbase Capella

Ranking in AI Data Analysis

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI Data Analysis category, the mindshare of Celonis is 0.5%. The mindshare of Couchbase Capella is 0.5%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Data Analysis Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Celonis	0.5%
Couchbase Capella	0.5%
Other	99.0%

AI Data Analysis

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining

Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.

Read full review

SupriyaKulkarni

Devops Specialist at Amdocs

Good GUI, easy to learn, and simple to install

The architecture is complex. I do understand that. However, the GUI is very user-friendly. Sometimes all these things are a little difficult to understand for a person who is not experienced in Couchbase. There is a constant requirement to upgrade the versions. We need to constantly keep on upgrading the latest version for the newest one. Currently, we are dealing with an issue where some of the servers are on the 6.5 version, and a few have moved to 7.5. So we are in a mixed mode right now. We are having a high IO issue on our servers, which we are already dealing with. We have these cases with Couchbase, with Red Hat, et cetera. We feel like this constant need to upgrade is something that is very mundane yet a very difficult task. If you have three clusters, which have around thirty nodes, the data is quite sensitive. Whenever there is Couchbase upgrade that is going on, we see that our SR is dropped. The purchase rate and success rate drop. This affects our business and the clients. Rebalancing could be improved. I find it to be a very slow process when it comes to rebalancing the clusters. If you talk about other architectures like Oracle, they are pretty fast. Couchbase is a little slower. Rebalancing, taking the node out, doing the upgrade, putting it back, rebalancing it, is a very difficult and cumbersome. For Oracle, we have been running on version 19.5 for the past five years. There were absolutely no issues. Yet for Couchbase, every six months, we have to go do the upgrade.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"find Action Engine for notifying the user, and also Studio Spark, and knowledge models; all these features are useful."

"The most valuable features are process mining, task mining, business analytics, and machine learning."

"Celonis has positively impacted my organization as it holds a Titanium partnership with Celonis."

"Celonis is intuitive, powerful, and user-friendly."

"I like that the product allows users to connect to different source systems like SAP, ServiceNow, and Salesforce."

"We like the process mining capabilities."

"The analyst role within this solution is very good; it provides a transaction dashboard, and KPI module, that are completely customizable."

"The most valuable features of Celonis are its graphical interpretation and pre-built connectors with industry platforms like SAP or Oracle."

More Celonis pros

"The way the nodes are managed is interesting."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

Cons

"I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies."

"I have experienced lags in response times from customer service. We are not always receiving responses on time."

"The solution must be more user-friendly."

"It would help if they had more integrations and automation features."

"Celonis could improve by expanding its use beyond finance areas into infrastructure domains, such as networks and server utilization."

"The support costs are very high."

"They are killing the customers with high licensing prices. The tool’s pricing could be cheaper. Small enterprises wouldn’t be able to afford the tool."

"Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems."

More Celonis cons

"The product could be improved by including a log section for tracking activities, enhancing database integration, and providing more transparency regarding pricing and monitoring activities."

"Rebalancing could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."

"Once we try to scale it up, the product becomes expensive."

"Celonis is cost-effective."

"The price could be better. If you ask a customer, they will always say it's highly-priced. In my personal opinion, the cost can be at the lower end. I think it's suitable for large organizations at this point in time."

"The solution requires an annual license. There is room for improvement because it is priced for organizations and not for individuals. For an individual, it would be too expensive for them to use it."

"Celonis is the most expensive solution in the market"

"It is only affordable for large or public companies."

"It is an expensive solution."

More Celonis pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Data Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Celonis?

Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?

I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Couchbase Capella?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Couchbase Capella?

The solution is basically used to support our ordering system, which generates a huge number of orders for our customers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase Capella?

We are Counchbase customers. Depending on your application, it is good to use Couchbase where you have high OLTP systems where you know there will be constant data loading, deleting, et cetera, hap...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Celonis

Compared 55% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis

Compared 11% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 4% of the time

More Celonis Competitors

Redis vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 29% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 23% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Couchbase Capella

Compared 17% of the time

More Couchbase Capella Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Celonis

January 2026

Download Celonis product report

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

January 2026

Download Couchbase Capella product report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Celonis

Couchbase

Overview

Celonis is the global leader in execution management. Powered by its process mining core, Celonis has evolved from its beginnings as a Process Mining company into an execution management pioneer, enabling companies to unlock execution capacity and perform at full potential. Celonis offers advanced technology in data execution, combining real-time process data, the intelligence to make sense of that data, and the execution capacity to take immediate, decisive action. Celonis’ Execution Management System makes data work for its customers by identifying inefficiencies and weaving interconnected processes together – thereby eliminating billions in corporate inefficiencies, empowering better business decisions and triggering the right actions automatically. Celonis is headquartered in Munich, Germany and New York City, USA and has 15 offices worldwide.

Celonis

Couchbase Capella is a fully managed NoSQL DBaaS designed for optimal cloud-native performance. It integrates high-speed and flexible JSON applications with real-time analytics, supporting billion-scale vector search.

This platform is tailored for cloud environments, offering enhanced operational efficiency. It supports trusted mobile NoSQL for always-on apps and real-time JSON-native analytics without ETL processes. Couchbase Capella is unique in managing the complete data lifecycle for RAG and agentic systems, providing contextual memory and response validation, facilitating quick and cost-effective development of AI-driven applications.

What are the standout features of Couchbase Capella?

Fully Managed DBaaS: Removes the complexity of database management with automated processes.
Cloud-Native Performance: Optimizes speed and flexibility for internet applications.
JSON Application Support: Facilitates fast and flexible deployment of JSON-based applications.
Billion-Scale Vector Search: Handles extensive data searches efficiently.
Mobile NoSQL Integration: Ensures seamless offline capabilities for mobile apps.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides instant insights without the need for ETL.

What benefits or ROI should you seek in reviews for Couchbase Capella?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with high performance.
Operational Efficiency: Minimizes manual database management needs.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing datasets and application demands.
Flexibility: Supports a variety of use cases with its versatile structure.
Security: Prioritizes data protection and privacy.

In healthcare, Couchbase Capella aids in managing vast amounts of patient data with real-time analytics, ensuring fast application performance for critical decision-making. In retail, it enhances customer experiences through personalized recommendations and dynamic inventory management, while in finance, it supports secure, agile processing of transactions and fraud detection.

Couchbase

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella

December 2025

Free Report: Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella

Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Celonis vs. Couchbase Capella report.

See our list of best AI Data Analysis vendors.

We monitor all AI Data Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.