Catchpoint vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Catchpoint and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.0, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #34 with an average rating of 10.0. Catchpoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

668 Views
418 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

433 Views
287 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and Ixia Hawkeye compete in network performance monitoring. Catchpoint appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, while Ixia Hawkeye is valuable for its robustness in specific use cases despite a higher price.

Features: Catchpoint offers proactive monitoring capabilities, comprehensive dashboard analytics, and various integration options. Ixia Hawkeye provides traffic emulation, real-time diagnostics, and customizable metrics catering to specific network management needs.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could enhance its specialized features for niche use cases, improve scalability for extremely large networks, and offer more detailed real-time diagnostics. Ixia Hawkeye could benefit from improving user interface simplicity, reducing setup complexity for less technical users, and offering more flexible pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint ensures a streamlined deployment process with detailed setup guides and active support for a faster setup. Ixia Hawkeye provides a robust installation process suitable for complex environments, offering dedicated support for high satisfaction levels, emphasizing thoroughness over speed.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint has a competitive initial setup cost with strong ROI, due to broad applicability and low maintenance needs. Ixia Hawkeye requires a higher upfront investment, which reflects its specialized capacities, promising high ROI for specific scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (40th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (9th)

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Carl Funk

Senior Manager at a training & coaching company with 10,001+ employees

The UI is well designed, so it's easy to get the visibility you want.

There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing. The other issue is the cost. The more data you collect, the more expensive it becomes. You sell your organization by saying we can get this feature set, but then you have to walk that back because we'll need more money to run every test. This is something hard to get out in your initial scoping. You provide Catchpoint with a series of tests and get a cost estimate, not realizing all the data you might have to collect long term. That was a big deal for us because we partly switched on the promise of saving money.

Read full review

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

More Catchpoint pros

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

Cons

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

More Catchpoint cons

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

49%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive simila...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 24% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 17% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 14% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 31% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 30% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 25% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 14% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

May 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

EMA

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

April 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.