Catchpoint vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Catchpoint and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #82. Catchpoint holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 20 Catchpoint reviews

4,526 Views
2,172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

2,359 Views
1,651 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Ixia Hawkeye

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and Ixia Hawkeye compete in network performance monitoring. Catchpoint appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set, while Ixia Hawkeye is valuable for its robustness in specific use cases despite a higher price.

Features: Catchpoint offers proactive monitoring capabilities, comprehensive dashboard analytics, and various integration options. Ixia Hawkeye provides traffic emulation, real-time diagnostics, and customizable metrics catering to specific network management needs.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could enhance its specialized features for niche use cases, improve scalability for extremely large networks, and offer more detailed real-time diagnostics. Ixia Hawkeye could benefit from improving user interface simplicity, reducing setup complexity for less technical users, and offering more flexible pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint ensures a streamlined deployment process with detailed setup guides and active support for a faster setup. Ixia Hawkeye provides a robust installation process suitable for complex environments, offering dedicated support for high satisfaction levels, emphasizing thoroughness over speed.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint has a competitive initial setup cost with strong ROI, due to broad applicability and low maintenance needs. Ixia Hawkeye requires a higher upfront investment, which reflects its specialized capacities, promising high ROI for specific scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (6th)

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

82nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (66th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	0.6%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Chethan Premsingh

Manager, Observability Automation & Service Operations at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Proactive monitoring has reduced downtime and now identifies traffic issues before customers notice

I think Catchpoint can be improved because it is competitively a little costlier. I understand that Catchpoint provides the best solution, but comparatively, if I compare it with Uptrends, New Relic, DataDog, and ThousandEyes, Catchpoint does multiple things, but it comes with a cost. That is one of the areas you can leverage use cases based on customer requirements and come up with a better pricing model. The existing ones are good, but for our use case from Zoom, we were just looking for our endpoints to be monitored every minute, and that cost us a lot compared to the existing tool that we were using. That area is something to look for improvement.

Read full review

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"My advice to others who want to start using Catchpoint is that it's more useful for eCommerce businesses, and if you want to use it, it's a very, very helpful tool because it captures data from end-to-end."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"Catchpoint has a very professional service team, they can help you with the scripting and other functionalities, and they have a dedicated network team, so if you face any issues with the geolocations on the nodes or anything related to the network, there is dedicated support available 24 hours a day, seven days a week."

"Catchpoint is very great software for troubleshooting APIs, websites, availability, and other third-party services such as CDNs, which makes it stand out."

"The capacity to identify those issues regionally, nationally, and globally was an unbelievable return on our investment."

"Catchpoint has impacted my organization positively by speeding up the process in detecting issues much earlier, even before the business reaches out."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

More Catchpoint pros

"So far, this product is doing exactly what it is promised to do."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"I would recommend Ixia Hawkeye because there are some KPIs that are very useful."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

Cons

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"For some larger workflows, I think the product could improve in a few areas."

"I think Catchpoint should have licensing models for individuals or very small organizations, and there is no auto-tuning for alerts, so auto-tuning features for alerts would be beneficial."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

More Catchpoint cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that you just need to buy the licenses, and the team sends you the license keys, which is pretty easy. I am not sure about cost-effectivene...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

I think Catchpoint should have licensing models for individuals or very small organizations, and there is no auto-tuning for alerts, so auto-tuning features for alerts would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use case for Catchpoint is to check website availability in different regions so that we can be aware of any downtimes. A specific example of how I have used Catchpoint to check website ava...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 6% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 6% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

June 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

Ixia Hawkeye provides network administrators with specialized tools for video streaming and application performance analysis, offering a straightforward deployment with efficient test scheduling and performance insights.

Ixia Hawkeye is a powerful tool for detailed network performance analysis, focusing on GPON and DOCSIS networks. It facilitates tests like traceroute, STP, and video streaming assessments crucial for proof of concept and service validation in industries such as telecom. Though cost-effective, there is potential for improving test customization, graph features, and making license codes more accessible. Users leverage its throughput test to gain insights into bandwidth, latency, and packet loss while also identifying areas needing improvements such as customizable outputs and enhanced comparison tools.

What are the most important features?

Specialized Views: Offers insights into video streaming and applications.
Performance Analysis: Provides detailed results on bandwidth, latency, and packet loss.
Graph Clarity: Easy-to-read visual data representations.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Efficiency: Simplifies test scheduling and execution.
Visibility: Enhances network and application performance insights.
Accessibility: Streamlined network performance assessments.
Verification: Validates internet services with real-world applications.

In the telecom industry, solution providers employ Ixia Hawkeye for enhanced network visibility and proof of concept. Network engineers and IT specialists utilize it for conducting performance tests and generating traffic, aiding clients in sectors like telecom with comprehensive performance assessments.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

EMA

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

June 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.