Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CAMMS EPM [EOL] vs QPR Metrics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 22, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CAMMS EPM [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QPR Metrics
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (20th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CAMMS EPM [EOL]?
Share your opinion
WH
You can use the process mapping module to build processes that can be converted into SOPs. Licensing is unreasonable.
The process-mapping module helped the BPR team in creating detailed process maps quickly. The process converter tool helped the team establish baseline SOPs that can be taken further to implement comprehensive documentation that serves the departments’ needs. The content management part helped in sharing the processes safely with the rest of the organization.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

SYCLE
QPR Suite, QPR Software QPR Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Waikato District Council, Mines Advisory Group (MAG), Adelaide Airport, VenuesWest, Bendigo Health
Eneco Group, Aalto University
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Anaplan, IBM and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: June 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.