We performed a comparison between CA Unified Communications Monitor and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"The dashboard, versatility and larger horizon are valuable."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"The solution gives pretty good network visibility. I am also impressed with it's monitoring."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"Device monitoring is a good tool of this solution."
"The solution is finely stable."
"The product provides intensive reports."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."
"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."
"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."
"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."
"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Unified Communications Monitor is ranked 95th in Network Monitoring Software while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. CA Unified Communications Monitor is rated 6.6, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Unified Communications Monitor writes "Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". CA Unified Communications Monitor is most compared with , whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, SCOM and Nagios XI. See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
