CA Unified Communications Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #88, while ManageEngine is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

799 Views
575 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 55 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

3,355 Views
3,154 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and ManageEngine OpManager are competing products in the network monitoring and management category. CA Unified Communications Monitor seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while ManageEngine OpManager stands out with its robust features, which many consider worth the investment.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides comprehensive communication analysis, tailored reporting for large enterprises, and seamless integration into existing frameworks. ManageEngine OpManager offers extensive network performance monitoring, advanced visualization options, and broader monitoring functionalities.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve its initial setup complexity, expand its supported environments, and enhance its dashboard customization. ManageEngine OpManager might benefit from reducing cost, improving its specialized monitoring capabilities, and expanding user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager provides straightforward deployment with versatile on-premise and cloud options, supported by a strong community. CA Unified Communications Monitor requires a more complex initial setup but offers personalized customer service dedication.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor has a competitive pricing model, potentially delivering higher ROI in enterprise communication environments. ManageEngine OpManager, though potentially more expensive upfront, offers substantial ROI through its broad applicability, catering to diverse organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

88th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (69th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.5%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Charles A

Deputy Director at Access Healthcare Services Pvt Ltd

Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement

Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most."

"The dashboard is unique and user-friendly."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"The ease of use and comprehensive integration are the most valuable features"

"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."

"The solution is scalable."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"The solution's most valuable features are reporting, event notifications, and alert management."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."

"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."

"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."

"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The cost is quite high-end for ManageEngine OpManager, especially in our very price-sensitive market here in Sri Lanka.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

The main drawback is there is less documentation available, both public documentation and partner-available documentation. The learning materials are very limited, and there is also a limitation of...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

December 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

January 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

OpManager

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager

December 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.