CA Unified Communications Monitor vs FortiMonitor comparison

Broadcom and Fortinet are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #101, while Fortinet is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.4. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Fortinet’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

379 Views
250 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

1,621 Views
1,313 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and FortiMonitor compete in network monitoring and management. FortiMonitor has the upper hand with its extensive functionality and comprehensive performance monitoring, offering perceived value.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers comprehensive analytics for communication performance, real-time alerts, and scalability. FortiMonitor provides advanced network performance monitoring, cloud integration, and automated incident responses.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve by expanding its feature set, enhancing integration capabilities, and offering more customization options. FortiMonitor might benefit from reducing complexity, improving initial setup cost, and streamlining interface usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor features a straightforward deployment process with pre-configured settings and efficient customer service. FortiMonitor offers a flexible deployment model compatible with cloud environments and emphasizes proactive customer assistance.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides competitive setup costs with substantial ROI through improved communication monitoring. FortiMonitor has a higher initial setup cost but justifies it with enhanced capabilities, promising a higher ROI through comprehensive performance tracking.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

101st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Alerting and Incident Management (7th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

JaimeVasquez

Commercial Manager at IT-Experience

Monitoring capabilities keep operations running smoothly and alerts enhance proactive system management

We use FortiMonitor to monitor the infrastructure of our customers. We check on what is happening with their operations, monitor bandwidth, ensure configurations are appropriate for the customer, and identify if anything is going wrong The most valuable features of FortiMonitor are its redundancy…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic, blocked sites, and the health of our hardware. That last part, about knowing if something's going to fail soon, is super important. It gives us time to sort things out before any big problems happen. As a system engineer, I need to keep tabs on everything – temperature, monitoring systems, and network operations. This data is really handy because it helps me ensure our site runs smoothly, whether it's turning systems on or off. Just last night, there was a system failure, but thanks to real-time monitoring, I quickly identified the problem and got the necessary replacement parts."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is what the devices are used for. We have big backups for our Cradlepoint solutions, but FortiMonitor is a great routing device and we love working with them."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"FortiMonitor is 100% stable."

"It provides the best firewall features."

More FortiMonitor pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

"FortiMonitor's monitoring could be much better. It should be like, in Palo Alto."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

More FortiMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 26% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 11% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

August 2025

Download FortiMonitor product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Panopta

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor

August 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. FortiMonitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.