CA Process Automation vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Broadcom and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #37, while Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.3% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

CA Process Automation

Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews

276 Views
84 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

1,771 Views
1,052 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CA Process Automation

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and CA Process Automation are competing in the process automation category. Data indicates CA Process Automation may have an edge due to superior feature depth and integration, although Nintex is favored for pricing and support.

Features: CA Process Automation provides comprehensive integration, scalability, advanced automation, and superior feature sets suitable for complex enterprise needs. It includes orchestration of multiple systems and offers robust processes to handle complex workflows. Nintex Process Platform offers an intuitive drag-and-drop design, integration with Microsoft ecosystems like Office 365 and Azure, and streamlined workflow automation that is user-friendly and quick to implement.

Room for Improvement: CA Process Automation could enhance its ease of use and accessibility, focusing on making deployment more straightforward for smaller teams. It may also benefit from improved user interface and documentation for developers working on complex processes. Nintex Process Platform could expand its feature set to cater to larger and more complex operations, enhance its scalability, and provide more comprehensive training resources for users adapting to its low-code platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform offers rapid deployment with a simple setup, ensuring responsive customer service that is ideal for companies with less complex infrastructure. CA Process Automation provides more extensive deployment support suitable for large infrastructures, with reliable customer involvement, catering to enterprises needing robust oversight.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is lauded for competitive pricing and a rapid ROI due to lower initial costs, making it attractive to businesses seeking quick implementation at a lower cost. CA Process Automation involves higher upfront investment but delivers a strong long-term ROI through its extensive capabilities and flexibility, providing higher value for complex requirements despite the initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (10th), Workload Automation (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

it_user464568

Design Lead at CSC

Provides the ability to import objects as new versions of existing objects and to make the prior version the current version.

CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing. As an example, swim lanes within a process provide an excellent means of organizing operators within a process, but they can introduce substantial performance issues. As another example, it’s better to perform verbose JavaScript execution within a Run JavaScript operator instead of within another operator’s pre- or post-execution script. As yet another example, it’s better to hard-code variables within the process dataset as opposed to creating the variables at run-time. The biggest issue for me is its lack of support for current JavaScript methods and functions, which makes scripts unnecessarily longer than they need to be. It seemed I could only rely on the methods and functions available in ECMA 1 (which was released in 1997), but that wasn’t a deal-breaker and the product is capable of extending its capabilities through the inclusion of other code libraries.

Read full review

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."

"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."

"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."

"The setup is easy."

"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."

"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."

"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."

"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."

"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."

"OCR capability should be added as a feature."

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."

"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."

"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation

April 2025

Download CA Process Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

CA Process Automation is designed to speed the delivery of IT services while helping to remove manual errors. By defining, automating and orchestrating processes across organizational silos that use disparate systems, CA Process Automation helps improve productivity while also enforcing standards. With CA Process Automation, you can automate IT processes that span multiple organizations and systems, reduce the time it takes to deliver services and enforce standards and compliance policies across departments. CA Process Automation helps you automate IT processes to reduce operational expenses, increase staff productivity, speed IT service delivery, improve service quality, and enforce compliance policies.

Broadcom

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Free Report: CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Process Automation vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.