CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs IBM Rational ClearQuest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Harvest Software Change Manager and IBM Rational ClearQuest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Configuration Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable.""Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."

More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Pros →

"It can be adapted to any process flow and easily be integrated with other in-house tools using the ClearQuest API.""The combination of a highly flexible state machine together with a platform independent API enables possibilities to automate many steps that in many systems are manual."

More IBM Rational ClearQuest Pros →

Cons
"Security features can be improved.""Technical support for this solution is very good, although they can still use improvement in some regards.""Password complexity is not enforced by the tool."

More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Cons →

"Lack of a modern web interface compared to other systems might discourage customers."

More IBM Rational ClearQuest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Once you purchase your licenses, there is maintenance support that is renewed every year."
  • More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    259
    Comparisons
    119
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    515
    Comparisons
    375
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Harvest SCM, CA Software Change Manager
    Rational ClearQuest
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA Harvest Software Change Manager (CA Harvest SCM) provides powerful, process-driven capabilities for managing development teams across your enterprise, encompassing multiple platforms and release management tools. This release management software enforces your IT governance policies and corporate compliance initiatives including those defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It also can ensure adherence to your ITIL-based best practices. CA Harvest SCM can help your enterprise simplify the software release management process as well as the development and maintenance of business applications with streamlined workflows and automated source code versioning. This ITIL release management software can optimize your development resources by providing audit, protection and storage of your software assets, and standardized process management and defect tracking.

    IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

    Sample Customers
    State of New Hampshire, Blue Hill
    Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Insurance Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government9%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Harvest Software Change Manager is ranked 8th in Software Configuration Management while IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 7th in Software Configuration Management. CA Harvest Software Change Manager is rated 7.2, while IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of CA Harvest Software Change Manager writes "Powerful UDP functionality with a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearQuest writes "Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point numbers. ". CA Harvest Software Change Manager is most compared with Endevor, whereas IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational ClearCase, HCL Compass and IBM Rational Synergy. See our CA Harvest Software Change Manager vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest report.

    See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

    We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.