We performed a comparison between Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and eG Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The technical support and documentation are quite good."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Pros →
"The algorithm is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Its ability to monitor failures and to restart a Windows service when it fails."
"Sometimes when we face issues with the new technologies or very old technologies where we cannot enhance the service, they move to work with us directly and start doing some development on this area which is very good for us."
"The most important feature is the ability to design, then implement monitoring tests on the fly as we are adapting to different situations."
"The auto-configuration or auto-Thresholding is very important because it saves a phenomenal amount of labor and setup costs and time."
"Single pane of glass to review status of the full environment."
"The ability to see what the end user response is, so I can get a better understanding of what the end user is seeing when they connect to the Citrix servers."
"The topology view which provides a visual representation of a service and quickly allows identification of errors or degraded performance."
"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."
More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Cons →
"The integration must be improved."
"In terms of areas for improvement in eG Enterprise, we are now moving most of our services to the OpenShift platform, and we need a way to monitor even containerized services or any service deployed on OpenShift, but that feature is still not available in eG Enterprise, so it's not good enough for us."
"eG Enterprise's licensing could be cheaper. Even compared to Dynatrace, I think the price is quite expensive considering the APM functionalities, even though they have other benefits such as info monitoring."
"The interface could be improved as it is not real intuitive. It is not user-friendly."
"would like to see improvements in the alarm display console."
"Their dashboards could use some improvement. The ability to customize them a bit more."
"Dashboards are difficult to create, and not so useful."
"The UI looks a little dated and could do with a refresh."
Earn 20 points
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is ranked 104th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while eG Enterprise is ranked 40th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 21 reviews. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is rated 6.0, while eG Enterprise is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management writes "Good technical support and scales well for cloud deployments but needs better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of eG Enterprise writes "Great visibility, easy to set up, and has very responsive technical support". Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is most compared with , whereas eG Enterprise is most compared with Grafana, ControlUp, Zabbix, Dynatrace and AppDynamics.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.