No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Brocade BigIron [EOL] vs Cisco Nexus comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Brocade BigIron [EOL]
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Nexus
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
108
Ranking in other categories
LAN Switching (2nd), Data Center Networking (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1068 - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Support Staff at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Just like its name, BigIron does big things; i have never had switching problems.
BigIron allows for improved reliability, Quality of Service, Total Cost of Ownership, security and scalability that enables future growth and expansion of the network for many years to come.It provides switching of high density for core tiers, aggregation and access to the data center server. Its compact design (high density and no-blocking) allows for high performance computing as well as data mining. Biglron also ensures a low latency and high throughput.In case of failure, BigIron switches supports restarts that are faithful for faster convergence, failover and software upgrades that are hitless.
Fakhar Mahmood - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Network Administrator at i2c
Migration between data centers has strengthened core connectivity and simplified segmentation
The biggest problems during migration were corporate issues, including dependencies on other devices such as F5, HSMs, and firewalls from Palo Alto. Everything was connected over the core switches, which made this a quite difficult part to manage and to onboard the teams and to understand the impact of the migration. We encountered an issue where we have two data centers, and unknowingly we were configuring the devices with the same VPC number on both devices. By doing that, we were not able to terminate the lease lines over those core switches. According to Cisco, we had to change the VPC number of one of the data center's core switches since they are in a VPC. We are still waiting, and it has been more than five to six years just to change the VPC number and migrate back the lease line. Now we are having cabin switches for the lease line and then the core switch. That VPC number issue was quite surprising for us. However, we have a very frequent issue with Cisco Nexus, particularly with the SFPs. Every time a port or the SFP heats up, it gets faulty. We have almost sixteen Nexus switches per data center. In a year, we experience one or two port issues per annum. We have standard Equinix data centers with standard installations, but somehow the temperature is always maintained and there is no ducting, yet the ports and the SFPs heat up or become faulty. This is a very frequent issue with the SFP-based port.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"BigIron allows for improved reliability, Quality of Service, Total Cost of Ownership, security and scalability that enables future growth and expansion of the network for many years to come."
"Cisco Nexus helped us do an entire data center migration in under six months."
"It is a scalable, reliable, stable and efficient solution."
"Technical support has been very, very helpful and they offer good SLAs."
"We definitely got ROI from Nexus and a pretty short term because the pure redundancy and the uptime is a real value add for us."
"Cisco Nexus has good overall reliability and configuration options. It is fairly straightforward to access the switching platforms."
"It gives me an unparalleled ability to build out my environment differently than I would have if I was going with another vendor."
"This is a good switch, overall, and there are only a few other features that we'd like to see."
"The most valuable features are the solution is robust, you are able to use it for fabric architecture as well as SPAN on exit with the controller."
 

Cons

"BigIron switches are expensive, take time to configure and maintain, but have capabilities not found in most switches and thus are an excellent networking investment."
"The solution has room for improvement in terms of the learning curve."
"Cisco Nexus is very costly for the service."
"In comparison to iPad, Nexus 7 has a fewer number of apps for entertainment."
"In the Nexus 3500, you can't do per-port Jumbo frames, so you have to enable it as a global configuration."
"It would be ideal if there was better integration with various other platforms."
"Don't discard Cisco Nexus because of the price."
"The subscription model and price could be better."
"The operating system needs to be improved. There should be stability in the operating system, and it should not have as many vulnerabilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This is a very expensive product."
"We use a local distributor for support, which is very expensive."
"It is very expensive. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"We have a virtual license."
"In most cases, there is a need to secure perpetual licenses to be able to use the product. When I set up the product, there isn't just a one-time cost that is involved."
"Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year."
"The solution is expensive."
"The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Networking solutions are best for your needs.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise83
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus?
Cisco Nexus switches are generally priced at the higher end of the market, but their performance, scalability, and reliability make them a strong option for enterprise data centers. The overall cos...
What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus?
The biggest problems during migration were corporate issues, including dependencies on other devices such as F5, HSMs, and firewalls from Palo Alto. Everything was connected over the core switches,...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Nexus?
Cisco Nexus is used in data centers with a simple Nexus OS deployment model. In our environment, we do not use programmability with Cisco Nexus. The switches are used very basically in our infrastr...
 

Also Known As

BigIron
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ajubeo, Akquinet AG, Big Data Analytics Provider Boligkontoret Danmark Bristol is Open, CDE Lightband, Cicero School District 99, City and County of San Francisco, Department of Emergency, City of Chattanooga, Cloudscale.sh
Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Arista, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Networking. Updated: October 2026.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.