Broadcom Clarity vs KeyedIn Projects comparison

Broadcom and KeyedIn Solutions are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6, while KeyedIn Solutions is ranked #15. Broadcom holds a 8.8% mindshare in PPM, compared to KeyedIn Solutions’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of KeyedIn Solutions users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Clarity

Read 143 Broadcom Clarity reviews

7,773 Views
3,887 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

KeyedIn Projects

Read 2 KeyedIn Projects reviews

1,167 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Broadcom Clarity

KeyedIn Projects

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Broadcom Clarity and KeyedIn Projects compete in the project management solutions category. Comprehensive portfolio management and scalability give Broadcom Clarity the upper hand in managing large enterprise projects, while KeyedIn Projects offers intuitive navigation and flexibility, appealing to users who need versatile features.

Features: Broadcom Clarity offers robust project portfolio management, advanced reporting, and integration with enterprise systems. KeyedIn Projects distinguishes itself with flexible resource management, customizable dashboards, and adaptability to various project sizes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Clarity's complex deployment model is suited for large IT infrastructures with comprehensive support options. KeyedIn Projects offers cloud-based deployment, a user-friendly approach, and responsive customer service, allowing quicker adoption.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Clarity has a high initial setup cost but provides significant ROI for organizations needing detailed portfolio insights. KeyedIn Projects offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, leading to quicker ROI for mid-sized projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Clarity

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

1st

Ranking in Project Management Software

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

143

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

KeyedIn Projects

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

15th

Ranking in Project Management Software

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Broadcom Clarity is 8.8%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KeyedIn Projects is 2.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Broadcom Clarity	8.8%
KeyedIn Projects	2.3%
Other	88.9%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

George Anghelache

Delivery Transformation Lead at Banca Transilvania

Broad perspective on strategic management exists but integration challenges hinder efficiency

The product execution part, such as planning and executing, is done through Atlassian tools, specifically Jira. We wanted to upgrade our ability to understand how all these products and teams are working against strategic goals, tracking expenses and time, but the integration between Broadcom Clarity and Atlassian Jira is very cumbersome and not straightforward. Their integration, even with ConnectALL, is just adequate, but it's never going to be great because they are actively trying to sell Rally. To make Broadcom Clarity a perfect product, I think with Jira, nothing can be done. To be fair, I don't know exactly how Rally integration works as I've only read about it, but I know that in marketing papers, it seems amazing with full-on integration, whereas with Jira, it just doesn't work that effectively.

Read full review

it_user490518

Operations Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It streamlined our project management and resource management process.

I think the functionality with the reporting capability can be improved and I know there's a new version of KeyedIn coming out. I haven't had the opportunity yet to look at the new version, but I would say that reporting is actually one are for improvement. The way their functionality is set could be improved because, basically, what it does is: you can pull a resourcing report and you can pull a financial report, and it seems like they pull from different databases. You're not always able to compile all the data into one report. You have to pull separate reports to look at different data. That's one thing that I found that has been kind of hard with KeyedIn, because you can't view all the data you want into one report. It's not that flexible. You have to work with two separate reports in order to come to look at the data that you want. I would say that's one area for improvement: You're just not able to filter all the same data into one report. I'm also looking for integration here. Integration with, for example, a BI platform. We're implementing a BI platform here. I know that in KeyedIn, there's no real data connector that connects straight – although you can still connect via API - but KeyedIn does not have a data connector right now. I talk to the rep each week and that's something that I think would be a big win for KeyedIn. If it had a data connector already, it would be easier to integrate with other platforms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the resource management, project management, and tracking time for our employees."

"CA PPM provides an integrated view of the total set of projects in the organization."

"It is easier to use than most other products that are out there, and it will provide us the transparency we need in our organization to see how work is being managed and moving along."

"We have a very stable environment."

"Clarity PPM's strongest features are project and resource management."

"Since the implementation of CA PPM, we can now ad-hoc a report or dashboard that has all information (allocated project hours, resource lists, risks and issues, and other data, for example) in a matter of minutes."

"It has improved communication vertically, with some amount of data to be able to show that more resources are necessary, or why projects aren't moving as fast as management would like. That sort of communication makes my job a lot easier."

"The organization that we contract for, they have centralized visibility into a lot of the different things that they were doing manually before, or on spreadsheets."

More Broadcom Clarity pros

"KeyedIn has been very valuable in helping us streamline our process here in terms of project management and resource management."

"It is a practical and useful tool which benefits both us and our clients."

Cons

"Broadcom Clarity PPM has some areas for improvement, particularly its dashboard, because it's too slow."

"There are some challenges that we are facing in terms of Jaspersoft software."

"I struggle also from a maintenance and support perspective. Now, I am going to be maintaining both new UX screens, which the blueprints make look like it is going to be really easy, but we would still have to be maintaining new UX screens as well as classic views for those functionalities that are not yet available in the new UX."

"We see it as overhead. Let us collect all the data in one place. Which, it is always nice to have everything in one place, but it does cause that overhead."

"I wish patches would be quicker since we're a SaaS customer, and just be a non-event, so we don't have to go through a whole - essentially - upgrade cycle, just to do a patch."

"When we upgraded to 15.1, we had some challenges around Jaspersoft, and also some issues with supporting some of the complex process work flows that we had designed internally, that were affected by some changes in the process engine."

"The classic UI is very cumbersome. It can do everything but it's hard to use."

"CA Communities need a lot of improvement."

More Broadcom Clarity cons

"I would say that reporting is actually one area for improvement. You're just not able to filter all the same data into one report."

"It was more complicated than it needed to be, but with a KeyedIn implementation manager it was not an issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different licensing models with Broadcom Clarity PPM. With the software as a service model, you pay as you go, and if you are on-premises, you can buy a perpetual license and an annual fee for maintenance."

"It is a little bit costly compared to others, but it is mature. Customer should understand this product is geared towards project management, not financial management."

"The licensing costs are a little bit high, and unfortunately, it has been a while since I've had that paperwork in front of me. I don't remember how much it was, but it seemed like it was fairly high. It is probably comparable to some of the other solutions because I do know that, for example, on a lot of the AWS stuff, they found that the costs wound up being higher than having some on-prem solution. Comparatively, Clarity is within the price range of other solutions."

"Broadcom Clarity PPM costs us $500K, and that's only for the installation and kick off within the first year. For each succeeding year, it could cost $200K."

"The price point of Broadcom Clarity PPM is less than Planisware. If a customer comes to me, and the cost is the main parameter for the selection of a tool, then I'll recommend Broadcom because cost-wise, they are less than other solutions."

"In recent times, I have been involved in the purchase of the license for this solution. However, the process of procurement changed and the option to buy individual licenses was no more available. The new subscription model was introduced, as a followed-up trend in the industry. The subscription costs put us in shock because it was double what we paid in the past as the yearly maintenance. We negotiated and the price was dropped. But this incident made me observe a lack of transparency from Broadcom in terms of licensing expenses. This isn't unique to Broadcom but seems to be a broader industry issue."

"It is hard for them to say, "I have a person on my team who is going to be available, I am going to move that task to them". That requires a project management license, it doesn't require a team member license, so the licensing model does not sometimes support the way the business world is going."

"Cost-wise, the tool is very expensive and some tools might be able to cater to 80% of the functionality provided by Broadcom Clarity PPM but are not as expensive."

More Broadcom Clarity pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

23%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	116

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Broadcom Clarity PPM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Clarity PPM?

The purpose for using Broadcom Clarity is strategic portfolio management, connecting the strategic teams with expenses and linking it to the execution of the product to understand what we're spendi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Broadcom Clarity PPM?

When assessing the flexibility of Broadcom Clarity in adapting to industry-specific requirements, it can do many things, but the biggest challenge is that it has traditional project management impl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Planview Portfolios vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 7% of the time

Jira vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 5% of the time

Planisware vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

Jira Align vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

More Broadcom Clarity Competitors

Planview Portfolios vs KeyedIn Projects

Compared 9% of the time

Cerri Project vs KeyedIn Projects

Compared 9% of the time

Atlantic Global PPM vs KeyedIn Projects

Compared 8% of the time

Project Objects vs KeyedIn Projects

Compared 7% of the time

Jira vs KeyedIn Projects

Compared 6% of the time

More KeyedIn Projects Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity

May 2026

Download Broadcom Clarity product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

April 2026

Download KeyedIn Projects product report

Also Known As

Clarity PPM, CA Clarity, CA PPM, CA Clarity PPM

No data available

Overview

Broadcom Clarity is a comprehensive project and portfolio management tool offering global resource management, financial reporting, and customization to meet diverse organizational demands.

Broadcom Clarity provides extensive project management capabilities with modules for task tracking, risk management, and time entry. Its flexibility allows for integration, improving automation and reporting. Despite its strengths, areas like reporting, tool integration, and interface design need enhancements. It aids strategic planning, demand management, and lifecycle management across industries like finance and government.

What are Broadcom Clarity's Key Features?

Project and Portfolio Management: Comprehensive tools for managing projects and portfolios efficiently.
Resource Management: Capabilities for managing resources on a global scale.
Financial Reporting: Robust financial reporting features ensuring transparent budgeting.
Task Tracking and Risk Management: Modules enhancing project transparency and visibility.
Customization: Users can tailor features to fit specific operational requirements.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes, improving time management and resource allocation.
Strategic Planning Support: Assists in effective decision-making through comprehensive planning tools.
Improved Transparency: Increases visibility into project statuses and risks.
Integration Flexibility: Seamless integration with other systems enhances process coherence.
User-Friendly Experience: Intuitive configuration contributes to ease of use.

Companies in the finance, telecommunications, and petrochemical sectors leverage Broadcom Clarity for strategic planning and resource balancing. In government operations, it aids in managing complex project lifecycles and capital budgeting, delivering improved decision-making capabilities.

Broadcom

KeyedIn Projects is designed for project management professionals seeking efficient resource planning, portfolio management, and workflow automation. It offers a robust platform to improve productivity and enhance project outcomes across industries.

KeyedIn Projects provides a platform that simplifies complex project management tasks, enabling better strategic alignment and smarter resource distribution. It supports flexible solution configurations, allowing professionals to adapt it to their unique processes. With enhanced visibility into project metrics and streamlined communication tools, KeyedIn integrates seamlessly into existing operations, fostering improved collaboration and transparency among project teams.

What are the most important features of KeyedIn Projects?

Resource Management: Optimize resource allocation with real-time data.
Portfolio Management: Prioritize and manage portfolios with advanced analytics.
Workflow Automation: Simplify repetitive tasks with automated workflows.
Time Tracking: Accurate tracking to ensure timely project delivery.
Custom Reporting: Generate custom reports for detailed insights.

What should users look for in reviews regarding benefits or ROI?

Improved Efficiency: Reviews highlight enhanced productivity.
Cost Savings: Reports of reduced project costs.
Scalability: Reviews mention adaptability to company growth.
Enhanced Decision Making: Positive feedback on data-driven decisions.

KeyedIn Projects finds application across sectors such as construction, IT, and professional services, where businesses need tailored project management capabilities. In construction, it aids in managing large-scale projects efficiently; in IT, it aligns resources with strategic projects; and in professional services, it coordinates multiple client deliverables.

KeyedIn Solutions

Sample Customers

Toyota Financial Services, GameStop, Polycom, Sky, Qantas, Cox Enterprises, Banco Mercantil, Borealis

Encompass Solutions, Alliance Healthcare, City and Guilds, MavenWire, NashTech Software, Nickelfish

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects

April 2026

Free Report: Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Clarity vs. KeyedIn Projects report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.