Bosch inubit vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Bosch and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bosch is ranked #42, while Nintex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Bosch holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bosch users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Bosch inubit

Read 2 Bosch inubit reviews

312 Views
303 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,510 Views
1,933 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Bosch inubit

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Bosch inubit compete in the automation and process management space. Nintex holds an advantage in pricing and customer satisfaction, while Bosch inubit is preferred for its comprehensive features at a higher cost.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers intuitive process mapping, seamless integration with third-party applications, and user-friendly interfaces. Bosch inubit provides robust analytics, complex event processing, and extensive customization for in-depth operational insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform allows straightforward cloud-based deployment, appealing to businesses seeking quick setup and scalability. Bosch inubit offers an on-premise deployment option, catering to complex industrial needs with extensive customization. Nintex provides responsive support, while Bosch inubit delivers individualized customer service for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is noted for competitive pricing, resulting in faster ROI for automation implementation. Bosch inubit, with a higher setup cost, delivers significant long-term returns for advanced automation needs. Nintex is more budget-friendly, while Bosch inubit offers high-value returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bosch inubit

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (10th), Workload Automation (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bosch inubit is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.9%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.9%
Bosch inubit	0.4%
Other	97.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

it_user1288188

DevOps engineer at Swiss Post Solutions

Has reliable technical support and good stability

From my experience using Bosch, I would recommend it to somebody considering it. I would rate it an eight out of ten. There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software.

Read full review

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability

Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution. And in that case, you are looking for some custom development. And it's a little bit difficult in the Nintex area. Because they are totally dependent on the low-code solution, and you are looking at where you can implement your custom things. However, you can do that thing, but that will be a difficult task. Also, the outcome, whatever you are trying to get from such kind of custom development, will be a little bit difficult. Let's suppose, like, if you are working with a medium level of data or a small level of data that will be easier to handle with the Nintex. However, the bulk data on a high level of data would be difficult. I have been working with Nintex for the past three years. I've been able to create some really good products in different domains, including banking and insurance. Everything seems achievable, but there are a few things I'm missing. First, debugging can be a bit difficult in Nintex. You can't debug forms and workflows easily. This is something that could be improved in future releases. It requires some R&D. Second, I would like to see more integration with AI. There is some custom integration available through the gateway, but it would be great to have more AI-related features built into the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."

"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."

"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bosch inubit

Compared 56% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bosch inubit

Compared 44% of the time

More Bosch inubit Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download Bosch inubit product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

August 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

inubit

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

BPM+ expands classical Business Process Management that so far had a strong focus on the process management perspective. The new inubit Suite 6 reconciles data and process management and supports all process types such as Human Workslows, integration centric and document centric processes.

Bosch

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

BAFzA

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.