Bosch inubit vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bosch Logo
345 views|224 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Nintex Logo
5,293 views|2,669 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bosch inubit and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

More Bosch inubit Pros →

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding.""The integration capabilities have been very useful.""The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.""Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity.""This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly.""Out of box connectivity with UiPath.""It saves time as tasks are automated.""I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."

More Nintex Process Platform Pros →

Cons
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

More Bosch inubit Cons →

"It's very tedious to manage.""K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows.""The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow.""Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform.""We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution.""The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement.""User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful.""​Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting.​"

More Nintex Process Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."
  • "Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."
  • "Our maintenance costs are reduced."
  • "The annual support costs are expensive."
  • "Comparatively, it's expensive."
  • "We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
  • "The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
  • "There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."
  • More Nintex Process Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
    Top Answer:The solution doesn’t have an extra fee. We are compatible with the package.
    Top Answer:The solution does not integrate with many platforms.
    Ranking
    Views
    345
    Comparisons
    224
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    5,293
    Comparisons
    2,669
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    484
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    inubit
    K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
    Learn More
    Overview
    BPM+ expands classical Business Process Management that so far had a strong focus on the process management perspective. The new inubit Suite 6 reconciles data and process management and supports all process types such as Human Workslows, integration centric and document centric processes.

    Discover, automate, and optimize your business processes with the Nintex Process Platform. This powerful and user-friendly platform offers comprehensive process automation and intelligence. Easily discover, map, and manage your processes, automate workflows, eliminate paper forms, and accelerate tasks with RPA bots. Collaborate with your team using Nintex Automation Cloud Services and optimize your processes through data-driven insights. Monitor and analyze your processes to identify and address issues, and make updates based on data for continuous improvement. Achieve process excellence with the Nintex Process Platform.

    Sample Customers
    BAFzA
    SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM) while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Bosch inubit is rated 8.0, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Bosch inubit is most compared with IBM BPM and Camunda, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.