Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs GeneXus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines processes, reduces errors, improves productivity, and enhances integration, automation, data visibility, and decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.1
GeneXus offers high ROI for large companies, excels in banking apps, and is effective for both extensive and limited user systems.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow support is effective but inconsistent, with strong documentation aiding users in resolving issues independently.
Sentiment score
7.6
GeneXus customer service is fast, knowledgeable, cooperative, usually responding within 24 hours, and generally rated highly by users.
It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness.
associate director at Nagarro
I have not personally dealt with Boomi's customer support, but my team mentions that support is not good.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is effective and rated highly for scalability but requires manual adjustments for resource scaling.
Sentiment score
8.4
GeneXus is scalable and adaptable, supporting growth from small projects to large systems with high ratings for ease and efficiency.
In terms of scalability, the tool is quite scalable, and I would rate it eight or nine.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten, as it effectively scales to meet our clients’ needs.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is stable and efficient for moderate use but struggles with heavy data loads and API integration bugs.
Sentiment score
8.1
GeneXus offers high stability with bi-monthly upgrades, rated 8-10 by users, best suited for simpler front-end applications.
The solution maintains high stability, which makes it reliable.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi AtomSphere Flow needs user-friendliness, stability, AI enhancements, better support, and flexibility for complex integrations and large datasets.
GeneXus requires better front-end, training, security, integration, collaboration, market awareness, UI, code speed, cost, community, alerts, performance, and language support.
It lacks features like the ESQL scripting language found in IBM's, which makes integration transformations easy.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Setup Cost

Boomi AtomSphere Flow's pricing is seen as reasonable, especially for small-scale operations, with ratings averaging 6.5-7/10.
GeneXus offers costly multi-plan licenses but justifies the price by replacing multiple developers and including maintenance and upgrades.
The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft.
associate director at Nagarro
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
 

Valuable Features

Boomi AtomSphere Flow streamlines integration with a low-code interface, boosting scalability, security, and efficiency across diverse systems.
GeneXus offers rapid deployment, seamless tech integration, error detection, multi-language support, automation, and a user-friendly architecture.
We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients.
associate director at Nagarro
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (31st)
GeneXus
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GeneXus is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GeneXus0.8%
Boomi AtomSphere Flow1.4%
Other97.8%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

KG
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
We manage app integrations effectively and identify areas for more flexibility
Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility. Even though our integration requirements are not complex, ranging from simple to medium, Boomi fulfills all our integration needs. We use Boomi for various types of integrations, such as SFTP integration, database integration, Snowflake integration, and we also perform transformations using maps and scripts.
XavierEspinoza - PeerSpot reviewer
Internal System Coordinator at Red CEDIA
Offers a simplified architecture with outstanding integration capabilities
The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization. The metadata obtained within the logic of different systems is also vital. Due to the solution, our company team doesn't have to work with multiple languages and integrations can be made with C Sharp. JavaScript can also be used with GeneXus, the tool takes charge of all the rest and has a simple architecture. The solution can be used out of the box without facing any issues and nothing much needs to be done with frameworks. In our case we need to use Python with GeneXus, we use Ironpython to embed python code in C# .
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Non Profit
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?
We are working with Cooke Aquaculture, and we use Boomi AtomSphere Flow ( /products/boomi-atomsphere-flow-reviews ) for integration processes. It is specifically used for application-to-application...
What needs improvement with GeneXus?
GeneXus needs to be more consistent in functionality without any errors. Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus, but in some cases, it saves time as well. Some errors will take too lo...
What is your primary use case for GeneXus?
Our company uses the latest version of GeneXus. The solution is used in our company to develop various enterprise systems, and GeneXus is used as an integrator, which further facilitates low-cost d...
What advice do you have for others considering GeneXus?
The tool's use case depends upon the requirements. The solution is ideal for integrations to modernize systems. GeneXus is also used in a site to develop systems with functional programming for big...
 

Also Known As

Boomi Flow
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services
Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. GeneXus and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.