BMC Track-It! vs IFS Cloud Platform comparison

BMC and IFS are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. BMC is ranked #18 with an average rating of 5.0, while IFS is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 1.2% mindshare in IAM, compared to IFS’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of IFS users who would recommend it.

BMC Track-It!

Read 5 BMC Track-It! reviews

342 Views
298 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 30 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

4,095 Views
410 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

BMC Track-It!

IFS Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IFS Cloud Platform and BMC Track-It! compete in IT service management and asset management sectors. BMC Track-It! is favored for deployment efficiency and lower setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious buyers, while IFS Cloud Platform attracts those seeking comprehensive solutions.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform provides enterprise-wide resource planning across finance, human resources, and supply chain management. It includes ERP features like business analytics, financial report generation, and customizable user profiles. BMC Track-It! centers on help desk functionalities and asset management with effective ticket tracking, reporting tools, and service catalog management.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform requires streamlining cloud deployment processes, reducing time for customization, and simplifying integration with existing systems. BMC Track-It! needs enhancements in advanced enterprise resource planning features, broader HR functionalities, and deeper supply chain integration to compete with larger platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Track-It! offers uncomplicated deployment with notable customer service aiding setup. IFS Cloud Platform, though requiring more time due to customization, provides strong integration support and flexible cloud deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Track-It! is characterized by lower upfront costs and quicker ROI, suitable for small to medium-sized enterprises. IFS Cloud Platform involves higher initial expenditure but promises solid long-term ROI due to extensive capabilities, appealing to larger businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Track-It!

Ranking in IT Asset Management

18th

Ranking in License Management

8th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in IT Asset Management

10th

Ranking in License Management

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (20th), Customer Experience Management (8th), Field Service Management (1st), Help Desk Software (12th), ERP (12th), Activity Based Costing Software (6th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (2nd), Local Government CRM (8th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of BMC Track-It! is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2287086

ICT Manager at a legal firm with 11-50 employees

Provides good stability, but it could be intuitive and easier to use

The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.

Read full review

Brendan Fisher

IFS Applications Consultant at Zest Business Process Management Ltd

Robust, customizable, and modern

IFS is a very large and complex software, and implementation of IFS can be challenging and may lead to a difficult lengthy project. It can take between 12 and 24 months in some cases to deploy. I have found that not all clients are fully aware of how big the task is that they're undertaking when they make a decision to move to software like this. Companies need to be more aware of the complexity of an ERP implementation project and while I fully recommend moving to IFS, it is not easy and does require business change when adopting an ERP solution. New features are a difficult ask - I work across multiple industries and everyone would probably choose a different feature. Maybe BIM in Construction or Customs link-ups for importers/exporters.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using the Help Desk and Purchasing modules, they let us keep track of all the issues in our organization and analyze them for trends."

"We can manually capture the assets available within the location."

"As a department, we have been able to identify problems and resolve them faster because of the centralized database."

"The customization of the product and reporting capabilities have allowed us to provide upper management the graphs (data) they request that helps validate specific needs that we (IT) have."

"Our efficiency has improved drastically due to a massive reduction in phone calls."

"Using their problem management process, we can use parent/child tickets and set up public views for our problem work orders."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"We use it to create and manage our work orders."

More BMC Track-It! pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users."

"IFS has been completely rebuilt, modernized, and cloud-based so we don't need bulky software installations."

"The platform is reliable and stable."

"The product is quite flexible."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products. This makes the UI a little bit easier to understand."

"What I like about IFS Applications is that it's easier to use and implement than SAP. I also like that the IFS Applications team is more flexible than the SAP team."

"The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software."

"Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

Cons

"The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version."

"Their self-service is not user friendly."

"The area where we would like to see improvement is in the asset management module."

"There are a few items that I would like changed or extra features that could be added to our current version of this software, but those are all going to be addressed in a future software update."

"The solution is cumbersome to use."

"Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult."

"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The technical support my company receives from the implementation partners of the solution is not that great."

"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward."

"The next version has already been released, and some of the technical things are a little bit behind the curve in development. This is specifically security, maintenance, security role maintenance, and creation. This is in their new product, called IFS Cloud."

"Some kind of bot assistance, some kind of artificial intelligence to help people solve the problems, would be interesting."

"Sometimes from the sales perspective, clients don't always fully understand how large a task or a project they're getting involved in when they decide, "We're going to switch across to IFS." They could probably do a little bit more, maybe around preparing people for these projects."

"The user interface can be improved. When you're clicking through the screens, there are some icons or symbols that really need updating and would be more useful and noticeable if they are aesthetically pleasing."

"Aspects of HR and payroll could be better."

"We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BMC Track-It!’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"We pay for a license to use the solution, which is not very expensive."

"There are varying license levels that you can purchase."

"Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."

"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"Compared to SAP, the pricing for IFS Applications was very affordable. People using the solution would find that it's worth the money."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC Track-It!?

We can manually capture the assets available within the location.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Track-It!?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC Track-It!?

We use the product primarily for help desk management, including login and resolution of calls. It helps us with IT asset management. We can manually capture the assets available within the locatio...

See all answers

What do you like most about IFS Applications?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine or ten out of ten since it is an extremely scalable solution that can be used for various use cases with thousands of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

I am not able to recall much about batch. Documentation-wise, they need more. There is not much available online, and the documentation availability is on the lower side compared to other products,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vyapin Microsoft 365 Manager vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 52% of the time

ServiceNow vs BMC Track-It!

Compared 48% of the time

More BMC Track-It! Competitors

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

January 2025

Download BMC Track-It! product report

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

August 2025

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

BMC Numara Track-It!, Numara Track-It!, Numara

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

Overview

Help Desk Automation

Eliminate the manual triage of issues that leads to stacks of sticky notes and emails, problems falling through the cracks, and overworked IT technicians with no way to track or prioritize work.

Knowledge Base

Centralize the documentation of known issues and use keyword search to find solutions. Technicians no longer waste time searching the web and troubleshooting issues that have already been solved by others.

Improved Efficiency

Keep track of how productive the help desk is, identify who needs more training, get feedback on the work technicians perform and justify resource needs to management.

BMC

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

Sample Customers

Florida Hospital, Mitchell International

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Buyer's Guide

BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Track-It! vs. IFS Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.