BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

BMC Helix and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #37, while Broadcom is ranked #6. BMC Helix holds a 0.6% mindshare in CCM, compared to Broadcom’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Read 2 BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reviews

388 Views
159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,371 Views
850 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth compete in cloud management and cost optimization, with BMC Helix leading in deployment and customer service, while VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is favored for its extensive features.

Features: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization includes predictive analytics, capacity planning, and detailed insights for resource optimization. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has comprehensive cost management tools, policy-driven governance, and financial control, offering an extensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support, making integration seamless. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, despite its complex setup, remains robust in customer engagement.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is considered cost-effective with a fast ROI due to its competitive pricing and efficient resource management. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth requires a higher initial investment but provides significant value through its advanced features and strong ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

37th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), IT Operations Analytics (26th)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 5.2%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	5.2%
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization	0.6%
Other	94.2%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

Appperf677

Application Performance Mnagement Specialist at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level

Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."

"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."

"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."

"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Compared 100% of the time

More BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

Apptio One vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer

September 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization report

Download BMC Helix Continuous Optimization product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

September 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization, BMC Helix Optimize, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is a comprehensive performance and capacity management solution designed to help enterprises optimize IT resources, enhancing operational efficiency while managing costs effectively.

It provides predictive analytics and modeling capabilities, allowing businesses to meet evolving demands seamlessly. By proactively identifying resource constraints and predicting future trends, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization assists organizations in aligning IT resources with business objectives. This strategic approach ensures optimized performance, resource allocation, and cost management with enhanced insights.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Predictive Analytics: Utilizes advanced algorithms to forecast future resource requirements.
Capacity Planning: Facilitates strategic planning to manage capacity effectively.
Anomaly Detection: Identifies unusual patterns that could impact performance.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides insights with tailored views for better decision-making.

What benefits can be expected from BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
Increased Efficiency: Enhances productivity by aligning resources with demand.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help with strategic planning.
Risk Mitigation: Early detection of performance issues reduces downtime.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is leveraged by industries like financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications to ensure resource efficiency. These sectors benefit from predictive modeling and capacity planning capabilities, enabling them to adapt to fast-changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

BMC Helix

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Dilliard's

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

September 2025

Free Report: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.