BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning.""Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system.""By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate.""Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation.""CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports.""You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass".""Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Pros →

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us.""It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment.""One of the major problems is that support is not so good.""The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Cons →

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications.""The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
Ranking
43rd
out of 75 in Cloud Management
Views
263
Comparisons
173
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
29th
out of 75 in Cloud Management
Views
26
Comparisons
10
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
390
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC CLM
Serverless360
Learn More
Kovai.co
Video Not Available
Overview
BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

  1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
  2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
  3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
  4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
  5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
    Sample Customers
    JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro
    MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is ranked 43rd in Cloud Management while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is rated 7.8, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management writes "Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is most compared with CloudBolt, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.