BMC AMI DevX vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.5, while Broadcom is ranked #9. BMC holds a 14.4% mindshare in SCM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 19 BMC AMI DevX reviews

4,806 Views
1,009 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Read 6 CA Harvest Software Change Manager reviews

387 Views
356 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

CA Harvest Software Change Manager and BMC AMI DevX are competitive solutions in the field of software change management. BMC AMI DevX appears to have an edge due to its stronger feature set, offering justifiable value for its cost.

Features: CA Harvest Software Change Manager is valuable for its version control, process automation capabilities, and lifecycle management, making it well-suited for structured environments. BMC AMI DevX provides comprehensive mainframe tools, real-time collaboration, and debugging features, benefiting large-scale integration projects.

Room for Improvement: CA Harvest Software Change Manager could enhance its modern deployment flexibility, update its user interface for better ease of use, and expand cloud support. BMC AMI DevX might focus on reducing initial setup costs, streamlining integration with third-party tools, and enhancing documentation for broader user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX supports flexible deployment models, effective cloud support, and offers real-time troubleshooting, making it adaptable for various scales. CA Harvest Software Change Manager focuses on efficient on-premises deployment and detailed integrations, though its structured assistance framework may not suit all modern environments' needs.

Pricing and ROI: CA Harvest Software Change Manager, with its competitive pricing model, delivers high ROI through efficient optimization. BMC AMI DevX, being more expensive initially, compensates by delivering strong ROI with its superior features, offering substantial returns for larger enterprises over time.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (9th), Database Development and Management (19th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (6th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (6th), AI Software Development (205th)

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 14.4%, down from 28.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Harvest Software Change Manager is 3.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	14.4%
CA Harvest Software Change Manager	3.4%
Other	82.2%

Software Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

Patricio-Martinez

Developer at Selfemployed

Good for large amounts of data and has a variety of use cases but can be complex to use

It's a very complicated tool. Sometimes the customer wants better, faster transaction times. They want the solution to move as fast as possible. We're trying to scale and grow our application with more servers to get the level of speed desired. Everything from small processes to big batch processing needs to be faster.

Read full review

it_user572910

Sr. Configuration Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has helped us track the application flow across each of our environments, promotion from dev to our higher environments, to production.

One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now. We have provided our feedback to their representatives so they can provide us a good merging capability next time. One thing that I would like to improve is making the tool a little more user friendly. It takes a little bit of time to adjust to the tool because it's a little different than other version control tools out there in the market. But, it has its own benefits and own security, but that user experience, if they're going to improve it, that would be really great.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As far as the software vendors that I work with go, Compuware has some of the best support, in terms of listening to customer requests and accepting enhancements to the product and the like."

"One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing."

"I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management."

"The debugging is really the most important feature, enabling us to be able to step through."

"The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development."

"Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development."

"The plugin ISPW integrated into Eclipse is a really valuable functionality for developers who already use it."

"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable."

"Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."

"The auditing capability is one aspect that I would really recommend other colleagues to look into, because all the other version control tools out in the market provide speed, but the auditing capability is missing; the change management interaction; etc."

"Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."

"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable."

"I have not encountered any stability issues."

"CA Mainframe Software Manager (CA Harvest SCM) provides a great way for us to store our source control."

"The most valuable feature I would say is we can integrate that with our change management process and use that to control what goes into production and what doesn't."

Cons

"I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer."

"When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?"

"Initial setup can be tricky in some cases."

"Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often."

"It would be nice to have an audit trail to see what mainframe developers are using what."

"One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Technical support for this solution is very good, although they can still use improvement in some regards."

"The features don’t always work as advertised."

"Security features can be improved."

"Password complexity is not enforced by the tool."

"When you're trying to do collaboration or when you're trying to cater to multiple users and developers who submit code changes, it gets challenging with Harvest."

"One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now."

"It needs to be simpler. This is the most difficult SCM tool I’ve ever used."

More CA Harvest Software Change Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"The price point is great."

"Once you purchase your licenses, there is maintenance support that is renewed every year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution. As someone involved in managing infrastructure, understandi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BMC Data Management for IMS and DB2 on zOS?

From my perspective as an infrastructure guy, the most valuable aspect of BMC's data management solutions was their ability to optimize CPU cycles, improving IMS performance without directly impact...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 12% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 8% of the time

InterTest vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Debug for z/OS vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Endevor vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 60% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 40% of the time

More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

March 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

CA Harvest Software Change Manager

March 2026

CA Harvest Software Change Manager report

Download CA Harvest Software Change Manager product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Harvest SCM, CA Software Change Manager

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a comprehensive solution enhancing code management and testing efficiency. It offers debugging capabilities within financial applications and integrates data management seamlessly, serving major banking sectors with reliable performance.

AMI DevX is tailored for banking industries, optimizing application debugging in COBOL and enhancing data handling in robust financial systems. It simplifies mainframe data management with real-time insights, improving efficiency through editing and cloning functionalities. The tool's integration with Compuware File-AID for IMS and DB2 ensures streamlined development processes. Challenges include a steep DB2 learning curve and initial setup complexities, with technical support inconsistencies and steep pricing impacting affordability. Despite this, its valuable features significantly support large banking operations.

What features make BMC AMI DevX valuable?

Line-by-Line Code Debugging: Allows precise identification and rectification of issues.
Variable Change & Line Skipping: Flexibility in testing without recompiling.
Database-Independent Testing: No need for loading databases during testing.
Real-Time Data Insights: Enhances decision-making with immediate information.
Data Warehousing & Analytics: Facilitates comprehensive data analysis.
Integration & Formatting: Streamlines development by simplifying data processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamline data management and editing capabilities.
Robust Debugging: Effective in both online and batch COBOL program debugging.
Enhanced Financial Application Support: Superior handling in grants and loans applications.
Comprehensive Testing: Enables creation of clone test files for thorough testing.

In large banking sectors, BMC AMI DevX is integral for grants and loans-related applications. Its robust nature supports financial systems, offering debugging for COBOL, updating data in Compuware File-AID for IMS, and integrating DB2. Users implement this for exceptional data management and application reliability.

BMC

CA Harvest Software Change Manager (CA Harvest SCM) provides powerful, process-driven capabilities for managing development teams across your enterprise, encompassing multiple platforms and release management tools. This release management software enforces your IT governance policies and corporate compliance initiatives including those defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. It also can ensure adherence to your ITIL-based best practices. CA Harvest SCM can help your enterprise simplify the software release management process as well as the development and maintenance of business applications with streamlined workflows and automated source code versioning. This ITIL release management software can optimize your development resources by providing audit, protection and storage of your software assets, and standardized process management and defect tracking.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Helvetia, The IMT Group, Hapag-Lloyd, Royal Bank of Canada, Chunghwa Telecom

State of New Hampshire, Blue Hill

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

March 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager report.

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.