BMC AMI DevX vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager comparison

BMC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Software Configuration Management category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #10. BMC holds a 9.3% mindshare in SCM, compared to Broadcom’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

BMC AMI DevX

Read 23 BMC AMI DevX reviews

7,985 Views
1,118 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Read 6 CA Harvest Software Change Manager reviews

623 Views
492 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

BMC AMI DevX

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

CA Harvest Software Change Manager and BMC AMI DevX are competitive solutions in the field of software change management. BMC AMI DevX appears to have an edge due to its stronger feature set, offering justifiable value for its cost.

Features: CA Harvest Software Change Manager is valuable for its version control, process automation capabilities, and lifecycle management, making it well-suited for structured environments. BMC AMI DevX provides comprehensive mainframe tools, real-time collaboration, and debugging features, benefiting large-scale integration projects.

Room for Improvement: CA Harvest Software Change Manager could enhance its modern deployment flexibility, update its user interface for better ease of use, and expand cloud support. BMC AMI DevX might focus on reducing initial setup costs, streamlining integration with third-party tools, and enhancing documentation for broader user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC AMI DevX supports flexible deployment models, effective cloud support, and offers real-time troubleshooting, making it adaptable for various scales. CA Harvest Software Change Manager focuses on efficient on-premises deployment and detailed integrations, though its structured assistance framework may not suit all modern environments' needs.

Pricing and ROI: CA Harvest Software Change Manager, with its competitive pricing model, delivers high ROI through efficient optimization. BMC AMI DevX, being more expensive initially, compensates by delivering strong ROI with its superior features, offering substantial returns for larger enterprises over time.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevX

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (2nd), Database Development and Management (11th), Mainframe Application Development (1st), Test Data Management (4th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (3rd), AI Software Development (30th)

CA Harvest Software Change ...

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 9.3%, down from 26.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Harvest Software Change Manager is 3.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX	9.3%
CA Harvest Software Change Manager	3.2%
Other	87.5%

Software Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

Wisdom Mbiza

Product Engineer at Absa Group

Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows

I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Read full review

it_user572910

Sr. Configuration Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has helped us track the application flow across each of our environments, promotion from dev to our higher environments, to production.

One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now. We have provided our feedback to their representatives so they can provide us a good merging capability next time. One thing that I would like to improve is making the tool a little more user friendly. It takes a little bit of time to adjust to the tool because it's a little different than other version control tools out there in the market. But, it has its own benefits and own security, but that user experience, if they're going to improve it, that would be really great.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."

"We have seen an improvement in the rate and level of quality at which we deploy changes."

"I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management."

"I think BMC AMI DevX has provided overall benefits and a positive impact because I've seen a lot of developers, not just the new developers, but even the old developers who have used the green screen their entire life, also developing with BMC AMI DevX and migrating into the newer screen."

"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."

"ISPW is an excellent product; it does everything the developers need it to do, we were able to build it and customize it very simply as we became more familiar with how the system works during installation, and it doesn't need a lot of care and feeding once it's up and running."

"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."

"The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change."

More BMC AMI DevX pros

"The ability to give our teams functionality from a control perspective, allowing them to decide how they want to implement the tool, is valuable."

"CA Mainframe Software Manager (CA Harvest SCM) provides a great way for us to store our source control."

"Using this solution, we were able to implement a full process for all of our lifecycles."

"I have not encountered any stability issues."

"The most valuable feature I would say is we can integrate that with our change management process and use that to control what goes into production and what doesn't."

"The auditing capability is one aspect that I would really recommend other colleagues to look into, because all the other version control tools out in the market provide speed, but the auditing capability is missing; the change management interaction; etc."

Cons

"Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement."

"We have noticed that Topaz supported Eclipse environments are rather old. It would be nice if Topaz were compatible with the more current Eclipse releases."

"The ISPW plugin could be improved to add some functionality which is already in ISPF panels and not in the plugin."

"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing."

"Initial setup can be tricky in some cases."

"The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment."

"We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates."

"I'm always looking for improvement in things like the documentation, to make things a little bit easier and simpler to understand, a place where people can go to troubleshoot issues."

More BMC AMI DevX cons

"Security features can be improved."

"The features don’t always work as advertised."

"Technical support for this solution is very good, although they can still use improvement in some regards."

"When you're trying to do collaboration or when you're trying to cater to multiple users and developers who submit code changes, it gets challenging with Harvest."

"Password complexity is not enforced by the tool."

"It needs to be simpler. This is the most difficult SCM tool I’ve ever used."

"One feature that we are looking for is traceability, and also merging. That is a little cumbersome right now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."

"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."

"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."

"The price point is great."

"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."

"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."

"Once you purchase your licenses, there is maintenance support that is renewed every year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data?

My understanding is that BMC AMI DevX is an enterprise product with custom licensing, so pricing is typically negotiated based on factors such as the modules purchased, organization size, and usage...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?

BMC AMI DevX is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could improve, such as simplifying the initial installation and configuration, especially for first-time users. It could also i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?

My main use case for BMC AMI DevX is to work with COBOL and JCL development on IBM. I mainly use it for editing, browsing data sets, submitting jobs, and debugging applications. I appreciate the Ec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Endevor vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 6% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Test Data Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

Gen vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

IBM File Manager vs BMC AMI DevX

Compared 4% of the time

More BMC AMI DevX Competitors

Endevor vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 22% of the time

BMC Helix Client Management vs CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Compared 19% of the time

More CA Harvest Software Change Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX

August 2026

Download BMC AMI DevX product report

Buyer's Guide

CA Harvest Software Change Manager

August 2026

CA Harvest Software Change Manager report

Download CA Harvest Software Change Manager product report

Also Known As

File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline

CA Harvest SCM, CA Software Change Manager

Overview

BMC AMI DevX is a mainframe DevOps platform for IBM Z environments that helps development and platform engineering teams increase release velocity, reduce change risk, and build a sustainable mainframe developer workforce.

Whether the priority is attracting the next generation of mainframe talent, safely evolving decades of business-critical code, accelerating release velocity, or demonstrating development ROI to leadership — BMC AMI DevX is designed to address all on a single platform. Teams can connect existing tools and adopt capabilities incrementally using an open-borders integration approach.

A 2025 Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that customers using BMC AMI DevX onboarded developers 50% faster, completed code changes 33% faster, increased release frequency by 50%, and reduced change failure rate by 33%.

Key capabilities:

Modern IDE integration (VS Code, Eclipse) with a unified development environment that reduces context switching
AI-powered code analysis including dependency mapping, impact analysis, and runtime execution path visualization
Automated unit, functional, integration, and performance testing with code coverage analysis
Git-compatible CI/CD integration with event-driven webhooks and an open plug-in library
DORA metrics and DevOps KPI tracking with AI/ML anomaly detection across the mainframe SDLC

BMC

CA Harvest Software Change Manager offers comprehensive change management for software development projects, providing a robust infrastructure for version control and collaborative work.

CA Harvest Software Change Manager simplifies the complexities of managing changes in software development. It supports various lifecycle stages and promotes efficient collaboration through version control, fostering teamwork and improving code quality. Built for environments that require reliable change management, it facilitates seamless integration with other tools, enhancing the overall development process.

What are the key features of CA Harvest Software Change Manager?

Version Control: Manages multiple versions of software projects, allowing teams to track changes effectively.
Automated Processes: Reduces manual tasks and accelerates the deployment timeline with automation.
Integration: Easily integrates with other development tools to streamline workflows.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by providing tools that support shared access to codebases.

What benefits can users expect to see from CA Harvest Software Change Manager?

Improved Efficiency: Automating repetitive tasks saves time and reduces errors.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better communication and collaboration among team members.
Risk Mitigation: Reduces risks associated with software changes through controlled processes.
Reduced Time to Market: Speeds up the development process, enabling faster delivery of updates.

CA Harvest Software Change Manager is widely implemented in industries requiring meticulous change management in software services, like finance and healthcare, where data integrity and compliance are crucial. It supports the specific needs of these sectors by providing secure and reliable version control, ensuring that software changes are tracked accurately and systematically.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari

State of New Hampshire, Blue Hill

Buyer's Guide

BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

August 2026

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC AMI DevX vs. CA Harvest Software Change Manager report.

See our list of best Software Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.