No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 vs BMC AMI DevX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC AMI DevOps for Db2
Ranking in Mainframe Application Development
7th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
BMC AMI DevX
Ranking in Mainframe Application Development
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (1st), Debugging (4th), Database Development and Management (14th), Test Data Management (4th), Mainframe Testing Tools (1st), Data Masking (4th), AI Software Development (190th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Mainframe Application Development category, the mindshare of BMC AMI DevOps for Db2 is 4.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC AMI DevX is 26.8%, down from 42.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mainframe Application Development Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
BMC AMI DevX26.8%
BMC AMI DevOps for Db24.8%
Other68.4%
Mainframe Application Development
 

Featured Reviews

Jeemit Zaveri - PeerSpot reviewer
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at cmc
Schema comparison has improved automated impact analysis and now needs native mainframe deployment
There is an area in this product that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. This product is a containerized product, which is good news and a very good part. However, the product can run on Linux and I think it can also run in Windows, but what I am looking for is that if this product is to cater to mainframe-based database changes, then the product should also be deployable on mainframe. Containerization is not new in mainframe and is possible, with an offering called ZCX, a containerization offering already available on the mainframe. Rather than hosting on a Linux machine, I could host it in the mainframe natively and make the changes in the mainframe. First, from an architectural standpoint, I want to see containerization running natively on the mainframe rather than deploying on Linux and then making a connection to the mainframe to make the changes in the mainframe. Second, the entire ecosystem of Db2 includes a product called Command Center, and the user interface of the Command Center looks a bit traditional in nature. With today's emerging UI frameworks, that interface is extremely traditional. There is improvement opportunity in that area. From the demonstration, I learned that having those things pre-recorded on YouTube or somewhere already hosted would be helpful. There is a playlist on YouTube, but it is more for Jenkins, while my shop uses Azure DevOps and they also have an offering on Azure DevOps, but there is no video for that. If we would not have had that demonstration from their side, we would have struggled. The improvement that I suggest is that the things people generally struggle with is the starting point and the demonstration of how to use the product. This can be very well documented upfront, or in today's date, documentation is not something that one looks for. One directly looks for a demonstration. If there is something ready to use, something one can just see, observe, and understand, then it will reduce the number of questions from the user side.
Wisdom Mbiza - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Engineer at Absa Group
Modern tools have boosted mainframe file extraction speed and simplified everyday workflows
I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts you for passwords. Then when you have to switch sessions, because we usually have to switch between production and UAT, there's no quick way of switching between the two. Every time you try to switch, it prompts you to log in. Additionally, there's a pop-up that I always receive. When you click X on it, it doesn't disappear. Eventually, I just end up minimizing it. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads. It doesn't just immediately start up and it's ready. It takes a good solid two to three minutes before it's ready so that you can work on it. BMC AMI DevX's logins and the other ones I can understand because security has to be there, but I do feel that once I've logged in, I shouldn't need to log in again. The startup problem is the annoying one because if I want to do something, I need to open it two or three minutes earlier to give it time to load up. The startup problem is the one that definitely needs to be addressed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Schema Comparison is a game-changer feature."
"BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it."
"As far as the software vendors that I work with go, Compuware has some of the best support, in terms of listening to customer requests and accepting enhancements to the product and the like."
"I like that Compuware File-AID can actually map out control sections within load modules, or, as they're now known, program objects."
"BMC AMI DevX helps me develop COBOL while juggling other responsibilities by bringing editing, debugging, job submissions, and code navigation into a single environment."
"It speeds up processes, makes things easier, more efficient, and from a mainframe perspective, the way the mainframe is utilized has become that much easier."
"I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout."
"With the use of ISPW, we were able to reduce our deployment time for specific applications by utilizing the auto-deploy features."
"Test data management capabilities are good."
 

Cons

"From the demonstration, I learned that having those things pre-recorded on YouTube or somewhere already hosted would be helpful."
"Their technical support could be better."
"It's a very complicated tool."
"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing. I know they have some out there that we are not licensed for at this time, but it seems like some of the Eclipse tools that are used for other programming languages, they're all just built-in and they're a little more intuitive to the developers. Making those testing tools as intuitive as possible, and as integrated as possible into the workbench, would be really beneficial."
"It's not as intuitive as it should be. In terms of navigation, there is a large training curve for using it. For a millennial it might be better, if they're used to Eclipse. But coming from a non-Eclipse environment and using Eclipse, though I have experience with Eclipse, it might be cumbersome."
"Initial setup can be tricky in some cases."
"One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution."
"The area for improvement is related to the testing tools that are available for unit testing or acceptance testing."
"Topaz Workbench often doesn't play well with other plugins in the environment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The only thing I would mention related to the licensing and/or the pricing, is that they have some visualization features in there that are licensed by concurrent users. We're starting to trip up on that. We're looking to probably increase the number of concurrent licenses that we have. But those types of licensing strategies, where they license by concurrent users or the number of seats is confusing for some people. They don't understand why it works sometimes and doesn't work other times."
"In general, Compuware tools are very competitive."
"In terms of pricing, there isn't an extra charge for the parts of it we use. It comes with the licenses we purchased for other products, so no complaints there. The licensing is built in with the other products that you purchase from Compuware."
"It has saved our developers time and effort when working on documentation, which is now more readable and fluent."
"I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive."
"The price point is great."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Application Development solutions are best for your needs.
906,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
33%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with BMC AMI DevX?
I definitely think BMC AMI DevX could be improved or enhanced in terms of the logging in features. BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Whenever you try to log in, it always prompts y...
What is your primary use case for BMC AMI DevX?
I work on mainframe, and some of the developers prefer to code on BMC AMI DevX because it looks more modern. For me, my basic use of it is just to extract information. Most of the time we end up ha...
 

Also Known As

No data available
File-AID, Data for Db2, Code Debug, Data Studio, Workbench for Eclipse, Code Pipeline
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Totalsec, Colruyt Group, Helsana, Amadeus
NRB, Iberdrola, Consorzio Servizi Bancari