Bluehost vs Vercel [EOL] comparison

Bluehost and Vercel are both solutions in the Web Hosting Services category. Additionally, 100% of Bluehost users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vercel users who would recommend it.

Bluehost

Read 1 Bluehost review

309 Views
309 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Vercel [EOL]

Read 16 Vercel [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Bluehost

Vercel [EOL]

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bluehost

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Hosting Services (10th)

Vercel [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

AliRaza4

Associate MERN Stack Web Developer at Bikter Tech

One-click installation, no setup time, excellent support

I give the solution a nine out of ten. We don't use the solution for any other tech stack. For example, we have a Node.js application, we use Linode for now. But if we have WordPress websites, we use Bluehost or Namecheap. Our organization has ten to twelve developers using the solution. The solution is used occasionally in our organization. If you want to install a new website, or you have to make changes or explore files, not on a daily basis. We currently have no plans to increase usage but it all depends on our client's requirements. Comparatively, Bluehost is more expensive than Namecheap and in regards to speed, they are both hosted outside of my region and seem to be the same. I would recommend the solution because it's easy to use and has a one-click installation, and the technical support team is very good at solving your problems.

Read full review

Basavana Gowda

Senior DevOps Engineer at Miles Education

A serverless solution with good performance

Due to RBI guidelines, we're facing issues with billing in India. Credit card payments often get declined even when we try to pay from the backend. Another problem is paying 20 dollars for each new project, even under one account. This seems odd since we already pay for one project with multiple hosts. The tool should improve its support. The time zone difference causes delays in communication, which can significantly impact production websites and servers. I'd rate the platform itself higher, but they still need improvements. They need to work on their billing system and create more understandable plans that clearly show costs based on bandwidth usage. A major challenge we faced was an unexpectedly high bill of 25 lakhs for one month when we usually pay only one or two lakhs (100,000-200,000 rupees). While they showed the bandwidth usage, we lacked support on optimising or implementing changes to reduce costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the one-click installation."

"I like Vercel the most for its ease of use, especially with Next.js. Its UI is user-friendly, and the solution is easy to learn. I was a beginner when I created my portfolio website with the tool."

"Vercel is easy to use, and it has a flexible user interface."

"It is pretty stable. I haven't found any bugs."

"I like most that whatever you make in GitHub is directly linked. It does CI/CD, continuous integration and continuous deployment."

"The solution's most valuable features are its response time and performance."

"I think the speed of the tool is good."

"The tool is easy to use."

"Vercel provides a better user experience and easier deployment than other platforms."

More Vercel [EOL] pros

Cons

"The solution's servers are in the US and Europe, and I would like to have additional servers near my region, in the APJ region so my clients don't experience any latency issues."

"If I could add a feature to Vercel to make my life easier, I would add a user journey feature for new users. This would guide them with tips on exploring the platform, showing them the routes for deployment and functions they can use. This way, users can understand all the features without upgrading to premium to see their benefits."

"Due to RBI guidelines, we're facing issues with billing in India. Credit card payments often get declined even when we try to pay from the backend. Another problem is paying 20 dollars for each new project, even under one account. This seems odd since we already pay for one project with multiple hosts."

"Initially, Vercel was great for hosting projects built with frameworks like Next.js or React.js, with NPM or Node.js as the backend. Now, they seem to be expanding into offering templates and ready-made front-end and back-end setups, making it possible to host a website without writing any code. Personally, I don't like this shift because it reduces scalability and the ability to create unique, customized experiences. Code is essential, and moving towards more user-friendly, code-free tools might limit deeper development possibilities."

"There is room for improvement in terms of error logging. It has some bugs."

"I encountered an error in Vercel's routing in the React.js projects."

"I've been using the solution for a while now, and while I haven't encountered major issues, there is room for improvement. The main problem I've noticed is with the error logs. They often lack information and only indicate that a file is missing without specifying the actual cause of the error. This makes troubleshooting difficult, as running the app locally might show the error in the console, but on Vercel, it just crashes without providing useful details."

"In future releases, I would like to see AI-based capabilities in Vercel."

"If you're not using Edge Functions, Vercel only allows 20 seconds of streaming from the backend. They should allow more time for backend streaming without Edge Functions. This is one thing that Vercel can improve."

More Vercel [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a little more costly than other solutions but their technical support is better."

"As a DevOps person who has to consider the commercial aspects, I find it odd that we must pay $20 per user for each new project under a pro account. That's not what I expected. Additionally, there are charges based on bandwidth usage. We incur additional charges if we go beyond 1 TB or 2 TB. However, we can choose plans based on our specific requirements. So, while the per-project pricing and bandwidth-based charges can add up, we have some flexibility in selecting plans that fit our needs."

"I haven't paid for the solution yet. You need to pay to invite team members."

"I use the solution's free version."

"The tool's billing allows 200 deployments per day, but if you want to do more work with the solution, you can opt for the pro plan offered by the tool."

"The solution's pricing depends on the size of the project."

"The solution is expensive for React projects."

"It's quite expensive for enterprise use, but it's worth the price."

"Most of the product features are free, which is quite advantageous."

More Vercel [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Hosting Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vercel?

As a DevOps person who has to consider the commercial aspects, I find it odd that we must pay $20 per user for each new project under a pro account. That's not what I expected. Additionally, there ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vercel?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vercel?

I mainly use Vercel for React and Next.js projects. We've done all our web hosting for these projects on Vercel. It's a wonderful platform for hosting web applications built with Next.js and React-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Webflow Business - Enterprise vs Bluehost

Compared 100% of the time

More Bluehost Competitors

Hostinger vs Vercel [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Framer vs Vercel [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Webflow Business - Enterprise vs Vercel [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Namecheap vs Vercel [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Squarespace vs Vercel [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Vercel [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

Vercel [EOL]

December 2025

Download Vercel [EOL] product report

Overview

Bluehost, an Endurance International Group company, is a leading provider of cloud-based solutions, including web hosting services, eCommerce tools, marketing applications, and more. Built on open source technology, Bluehost designs and operates its own servers, develops innovative new internet technologies, and actively supports and participates in the open source community.

Bluehost

Vercel is the Frontend Cloud. Build, scale, and secure a faster, personalized web.
Deploy an AI app in seconds on Vercel, using our pre-built templates. Easily stream long-running LLM responses for a better user experience with zero-config infrastructure that's always globally performant.

Vercel

See our list of best Web Hosting Services vendors.

We monitor all Web Hosting Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.