"The stability is good."
"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."
"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports."
"Having more options for customization would be helpful."
"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."
"The reporting capabilities could be improved."
"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."
"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."
"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."
"Micro Focus needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.
BlazeMeter is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Easy to navigate and offers reasonable pricing but needs grouping features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Full geographical coverage, integrates well with monitoring tools, granular project inspection capabilities". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis NeoLoad and Tricentis Flood, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Silk Performer, Apache JMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad. See our BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.