BlazeMeter vs Functionize comparison

Perforce and Functionize are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while Functionize is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0. Perforce holds a 1.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to Functionize’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Functionize users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,205 Views
631 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Functionize

Read 1 Functionize review

987 Views
987 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Functionize

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Functionize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (3rd), Functional Testing Tools (9th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (8th)

Functionize

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

13th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Functionize is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlazeMeter	1.1%
Functionize	1.9%
Other	97.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

reviewer2541093

QA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services

The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based nature, which allows us to conduct tests without relying on local resources."

"It is a stable solution. When we compare BlazeMeter with other tools in the market, I can say that the solution's overall performance has also been very good in our company."

"One thing that we are doing a lot with the solution, and it's very good, is orchestrating a lot of JMeter agents. This feature has helped us a lot because we can reuse other vendors' performance scripts that they have used with JMeter before."

"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."

"The stability is good."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process."

Cons

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

"The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating. I would rate it as a seven because they respond once they are available."

"One problem, while we are executing a test, is that it will take some time to download data. Let's say I'm performance testing with a high-end load configuration. It takes a minimum of three minutes or so to start the test itself. That's the bad part of the performance testing... every time I rerun the same test, it is downloaded again... That means I have to wait for three to four minutes again."

"I don't think I can generate a JMX file unless I run JMeter, which is one of my concerns when it comes to BlazeMeter."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"Sometimes, when we execute tests, the results calculated by BlazeMeter, specifically the response times for failed transactions, are incorrect."

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

More BlazeMeter cons

"The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?

The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Functionize?

The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Functionize?

We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Testim vs Functionize

Compared 38% of the time

mabl vs Functionize

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Functionize

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Functionize

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Functionize

Compared 4% of the time

More Functionize Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

January 2026

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Functionize product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Functionize delivers an autonomous testing platform that incorporates AI and machine learning technologies to automate the painstaking software testing process.

Functionize

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.