BlazeMeter vs Functionize comparison

Perforce and Functionize are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Functionize is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0. Perforce holds a 0.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Functionize’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Functionize users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,544 Views
318 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Functionize

Read 1 Functionize review

1,030 Views
1,030 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Functionize

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Functionize based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (10th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (7th)

Functionize

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Functionize is 2.1%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

reviewer2541093

QA Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient test automation for web applications and has good technical support services

The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process. Vision AI enhances image recognition capabilities, improving the accuracy and efficiency of visual testing. The audit trail feature helps track changes and maintain compliance, which is particularly important in regulated industries. Smart fix automatically resolves issues, reducing manual intervention, while the self-healing feature ensures that test cases remain accurate and functional, even when system changes occur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process."

"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."

"There is a repository of all the scripts that we have created. You can go back and compare tests to see what the tests looked like. If I want to go and compare something with whatever happened six months or one year back, I can do that."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them."

"The stability is good."

"BlazeMeter has provided me with a vast cloud platform to run JMeter script files, eliminating the need for storage or load providers."

"The solution’s most valuable feature is the dashboard."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The platform's most valuable features include its recorder, which allows users to create test cases with minimal effort, significantly simplifying the process."

Cons

"BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it."

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

"The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating. I would rate it as a seven because they respond once they are available."

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

"The scanning capability needs improvement."

"If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market."

More BlazeMeter cons

"The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Functionize?

The product helps reduce overall costs by decreasing reliance on manual testers and speeding up testing cycles.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Functionize?

The solution currently does not support mobile applications. It would significantly improve its versatility.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Functionize?

We use the product to transition customers from manual to automated testing, particularly for web applications. It involves reducing team sizes, accelerating testing strategies, and providing speci...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 42% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Testim vs Functionize

Compared 41% of the time

mabl vs Functionize

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Functionize

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Functionize

Compared 12% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs Functionize

Compared 5% of the time

More Functionize Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

August 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download Functionize product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Functionize delivers an autonomous testing platform that incorporates AI and machine learning technologies to automate the painstaking software testing process.

Functionize

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Salesforce, Mastercard, Google, HP Enterprise, Cisco, Farmers Insurance, The General

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.