BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs erwin Evolve comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BiZZdesign and Quest Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BiZZdesign is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.1, while Quest Software is ranked #12. BiZZdesign holds a 3.9% mindshare in AM, compared to Quest Software’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of BiZZdesign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 31 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

5,007 Views
3,555 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve

Read 19 erwin Evolve reviews

4,460 Views
3,033 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

erwin Evolve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Erwin Evolve and BiZZdesign HoriZZon are two prominent competitors in the Enterprise Architecture tools category. BiZZdesign HoriZZon may have the upper hand due to its extensive strategic capabilities.

Features: Erwin Evolve offers advanced integration capabilities, robust data governance, and excels in modeling complex systems. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides powerful collaboration tools, advanced analytics, and helps in strategic planning and transformation efforts.

Room for Improvement: Erwin Evolve could enhance its user interface, decrease complexity for new users, and improve web-only functionalities. BiZZdesign HoriZZon might benefit from more comprehensive real-time integration capabilities, expanded training resources, and a broader library of sample models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Evolve ensures efficient integration with existing systems and offers comprehensive customer service. BiZZdesign HoriZZon is recognized for its intuitive deployment process and outstanding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Evolve typically offers competitive pricing with potentially lower initial costs. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, while commanding higher upfront investment, is justified by its strategic benefits leading to potentially greater long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

4th

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

erwin Evolve

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

12th

Ranking in Business Process Design

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 3.9%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve is 3.5%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BiZZdesign HoriZZon	3.9%
erwin Evolve	3.5%
Other	92.6%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2022765

Sr Consultant BI Z Zdesign Center Of Excellence at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Targeted stakeholder views have improved decision making and reduced architecture costs

BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers various valuable features. The best ones, besides those I have mentioned, include the AI space with the Diagram Describer and the Explorer functionality. I understand that BiZZdesign HoriZZon is also working on the Diagram Importer, which complements the Diagram Describer feature, providing full import and export functionality. Together with the contributor role and targeted stakeholder management, these features are essential. BiZZdesign HoriZZon introduced the Dynamic Solution Intent, enhancing the solution architecture by engaging diverse stakeholders with architectural artifacts. It supports the development of holistic solutions using reusable repository components. The deployment is hybrid cloud-based, specifically using Amazon Web Services as the cloud provider. I have also seen the implementation of return on investment features that contribute significantly to the organization’s overall effectiveness.

Read full review

ScottLawson

Director IT Architecture at QAD

Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data.

We tried their collaborative web modeling and we used it with a few people but we tend to not use that piece. We tend to collaborate with the people and then my team of architects draws up the diagram using the modeling tool. We then iterate through those. I would like to use it, but it was a little clunky when they first rolled it out. Overall, it's more about the company having room for improvement. What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things. I hear them talking in the support forums and, when I talk to the representative, they say they're going to do a bunch of stuff but it seems the progress is slow. The changes they need to make are to take their old, legacy product, which we use, and focus a lot on it so they can transform it into a modern cloud tool so that we have fewer little pieces to deal with. They could also fix their security model. It's very confusing to get new people onto the tool and to make sure that your content isn't being exposed to the wrong people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the application, portfolio, data, architectures, and modeling things."

"Everything being in one place really benefits me from an architectural perspective and also benefits the architectural, enterprise architecture team and the business."

"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."

"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon is scalable, and I'd give it an eight out of ten for scalability. Our customers are enterprise level companies, but the solution is suitable for small and mid-sized companies as well."

"A big impact that BiZZdesign HoriZZon has on my organization is to improve the overview of the whole system for people around us."

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon is a fantastic tool for enterprise architecture and capability mapping that helps map capabilities by turning complex engineering data into clear design documents, which is very important for cross-functional alignment and onboarding teams so they can onboard faster and it acts as a single source of truth."

"I like the flexibility of the modeling part for standards like ArchiMate and, at the same time, BPMN. It allows us to connect elements from different areas and to have a single repository and a single source of truth. It gives us one place to do analysis throughout the organization."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

"We use erwin Evolve to publish to the website. This allows us to enable publishing our website using parameterisation features. In a very fast, quick way, we can publish a table or chart onto a website."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"The ERwin tool helped to reduce the rate of design and deployment errors and increased the ease of validation."

"Evolve is scalable with multi-user ability, so multiple designers and engineers can work on the same data model simultaneously."

"Evolve's reverse engineering ability is quite useful."

"Customer Service: Outstanding Technical Support: Outstanding"

"By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."

More erwin Evolve pros

Cons

"We tested it, and we had support from BiZZdesign, including patches, but it just didn't do what we wanted."

"It takes a long time to learn and understand, which is a learning curve you have to go through, but once you know how it works, it's very nice to work with."

"I noticed that there were times when the cloud version would get stuck or was not able to load."

"There could be simpler modelling."

"The frame, the labeling, the text, everything, they are scattered."

"It should be more open to integrating with other existing tools. Although there has been progress in the past."

"The automatic data collection and interface need improvement."

"In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

"Add some ability to do conditional Visualization on the models and in reports (some ideas) – maybe as a specialized Theme or Diagram or Display."

"On upgrade– if the older models in the Workgroup Repository need to be upgraded, allow for a cascade update to newest version through the libraries."

"With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

"The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done."

"Would like to see canonical modeling supported for web services."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

More erwin Evolve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"The price is reasonable."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I noticed that there were times when the cloud version would get stuck or was not able to load. There were issues with the login capability, and that was some time ago, a few months ago. I am not s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

There was a merger that the client entered into, and following that merger, we inherited a large technology inventory from the acquired organization. The acquired inventory from the organization ha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The real experience I have had and seeing the result of using it in a large team where a large scale enterprise architecture and merger is happening is a very unique experience I have had with BiZZ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

iServer vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 12% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 7% of the time

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 5% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve

Compared 11% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Evolve

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve

Compared 7% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve

Compared 5% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs erwin Evolve

Compared 5% of the time

More erwin Evolve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

November 2026

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve

November 2026

Download erwin Evolve product report

Also Known As

HoriZZon

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

BiZZdesign HoriZZon offers robust enterprise architecture modeling, seamless collaboration, and supports ArchiMate standards, benefiting organizations with efficient integration capabilities, intuitive features, and stakeholder accessibility.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon facilitates enterprise architecture through its strong modeling features in Enterprise Studio, providing collaborative dashboards and integration with systems like ServiceNow and SQL databases. Known for quick loading times and diagrammatic representation, it supports multiple modeling languages while maintaining an intuitive web interface. Despite its strengths, organizations find challenges with interface complexity, high costs, a steep learning curve, and scalability in large datasets.

What are the key features of BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

Modeling in Enterprise Studio: Enables comprehensive architecture and process modeling.
Collaborative Dashboards: Promotes teamwork with shared perspectives.
ArchiMate Standards: Ensures compliance and consistency in modeling frameworks.
Integration Options: Seamlessly connects with ServiceNow and SQL databases.
Repository Management: Centralizes data for efficient governance.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved Decision Making: Facilitates informed choices through clear architecture representation.
Process Optimization: Streamlines operations leveraging capability mapping.
Accessibility for Stakeholders: Simplifies architectural insights for all involved parties.
Enhanced Governance: Supports enterprise-wide oversight and documentation management.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon serves industries focused on enterprise architecture, aiding in project governance and application portfolio management. Organizations in sectors like finance, manufacturing, and IT leverage it to align architectural elements with business goals, centralize architecture data, and optimize processes for better decision-making and oversight.

BiZZdesign

Erwin Evolve enhances workflow visibility through impact analysis and collaborative sharing with a dynamic web interface. Its adaptability supports complex organizational processes, improving interaction for stakeholders.

Erwin Evolve offers a comprehensive platform for enterprise architecture and business process modeling. Its integration with metadata tools like Workday accelerates workflow management, while its reverse engineering and graphical capabilities support data model visualization. Users benefit from its flexibility across architectural modeling tasks, ensuring seamless synchronization with Erwin Data Modeler. Despite room for improvement in canonical modeling for web services and NoSQL database support, Erwin Evolve remains a valuable resource for system analysis and IT asset management.

What are the key features of Erwin Evolve?

Impact Analysis: Evaluates the potential effects of changes within systems.
Collaborative Sharing: Facilitates stakeholder engagement and data sharing.
Web Interface: Enables intuitive interaction with organizational processes.
Metadata Integration: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Workday.
Reverse Engineering: Enhances data model visualization and analysis.
Scalability: Supports diverse architectural modeling requirements.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Improved Workflow Management: Enhances process visibility and efficiency.
Adaptability: Accommodates complex modeling needs with ease.
Security: Provides essential data protection features.
Enhanced Integration: Streamlines connectivity with enterprise tools.
User Experience: Delivers an intuitive and accessible platform.

Erwin Evolve is widely applied across industries for enterprise architecture and business process modeling. Users employ it to catalog architectural components, support consulting services, and manage IT assets. It is integral for linking to CMDBs and facilitating IT infrastructure tasks, presenting information clearly. The platform supports industry models and strategic modeling, playing a vital role in developing standard operating procedures across divisions, with many deploying hosted versions on Google Cloud and Azure.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve

November 2026

Free Report: BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve

Find out what your peers are saying about BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. erwin Evolve report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors and best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.