Bizagi vs Resolve Actions comparison

"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."

"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."

"Very, very stable."

"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."

"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."

"It improves visibility and quality, and basically, it avoids human errors."

"The initial setup is super simple."

"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."

"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"I'm not really satisfied with the reporting aspect."

"The open source version lacks the option to publish."

"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."

"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."

"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties."

"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."

"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."

"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."

"This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."

"It is not expensive."

"Bizagi is totally free for modeling."

"It is expensive."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"The product must improve its cost."

"We have no issues with the pricing."

"Its price is reasonable."

"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."