Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Camunda vs Resolve Actions comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Camunda
Ranking in Process Automation
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st)
Resolve Actions
Ranking in Process Automation
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.8%, down from 27.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Resolve Actions is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Camunda21.8%
Resolve Actions0.3%
Other77.9%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years
I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.
Naresh Rayakwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable platform with a straightforward setup process
The initial setup process is straightforward. It usually takes a day if all the prerequisites are met. It requires correctly configuring the property file. The process is particularly uncomplicated if the deployment is on a standalone system. However, in a clustered environment, the property file needs to be deployed on each server with precise sequencing, following the guidelines provided by the system. The installation script is then executed to install the overall product. The deployment time depends on different use cases and requires one executive to work on it. The level of maintenance support is also based on the use cases. Two executives can easily maintain the product for a simple vanilla setup with normal use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."
 

Cons

"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"Camunda needs to improve its user interface for low-code development and provide more user interface options beyond the basic workflow."
"We have to wait to see if Bonita provided us with some features that Camunda does not or if we experience any stability issues."
"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the number of processes that need to be automated or where the orchestration part needs to be used. The product is affordable for medium and large enterprises."
"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."
"We pay for the license of this solution annually."
"While the license isn't budget-friendly, careful consideration and calculated planning for a significant number of licenses can make it more cost-effective."
"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."
"We use a community version."
"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
6%
Insurance Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise29
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Resolve Actions?
The platform allows us to create workflows easily.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Resolve Actions?
They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license.
What needs improvement with Resolve Actions?
Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Camunda BPM
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Tesla 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. Salesforce 11. Oracle 12. Cisco 13. Intel 14. HP 15. Dell 16. Samsung 17. Sony 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Airbnb 21. LinkedIn 22. Spotify 23. Pinterest 24. Snapchat 25. Dropbox 26. Slack 27. Square 28. Zoom 29. Shopify 30. Reddit 31. TikTok 32. Lyft
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: October 2025.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.