No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Basis ActiveControl vs nOps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Basis ActiveControl
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (39th), Release Automation (19th)
nOps
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Basis ActiveControl and nOps aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Basis ActiveControl is designed for Release Automation and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
nOps, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Management, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.
Release Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Basis ActiveControl1.2%
Microsoft Azure DevOps26.2%
GitLab24.3%
Other48.3%
Release Automation
Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
nOps0.9%
VMware Aria Automation5.5%
IBM Turbonomic4.7%
Other88.9%
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Basis ActiveControl?
Leave a review
Tom Weeks - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs
I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
48%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Construction Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.
What needs improvement with nOps?
nOps can be improved by having their account managers be more responsive and treat customers that are tail spend a little bit better than enterprise customers. I understand that smaller customers s...
What is your primary use case for nOps?
My main use case for nOps is cost savings. A quick, specific example of how I use nOps for cost savings is through their automated cost savings feature. This involves automated management of saving...
 

Also Known As

ActiveControl
nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

P&G, Honda, Booking.com, Vistaprint, Sony Music, Diageo, Ericsson, 3M
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: May 2026.
899,258 professionals have used our research since 2012.