We performed a comparison between Barracuda Load Balancer ADC and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The price is very good, and it's not very expensive."
"Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."
"Using policies to link and manage these URL-based routing configurations is also valuable."
"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."
"The most valuable feature is WAF."
"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."
"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is traffic management."
"WAF feature replicates the firewall."
"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."
"Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."
"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved."
"For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved."
"The monitoring on the solution could be better."
"It takes a lot of time for a certificate to update in the system. That is a huge drawback, affecting the load-balancing side. And when there are changes to the load balancing, it affects the end-user."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The product's performance should be better."
"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."
"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."
"It could be easier to change servicing."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is ranked 14th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 3 reviews while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 38 reviews. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is rated 7.4, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC writes "Cost-effective but lacking features and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Fortinet FortiADC, Citrix NetScaler, Kemp LoadMaster and HAProxy, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall. See our Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
