Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Barracuda Networks and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Barracuda Networks holds a 0.8% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Read 39 Barracuda CloudGen Firewall reviews

2,141 Views
43 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Read 10 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews

1,435 Views
1,435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security compete in the network security category. Barracuda appears to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly interface and cost-effective offerings, making it more appealing for businesses prioritizing ease of use and efficient security.

Features: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers real-time firewall logs, TINA VPN tunnels, and robust Application Control with IPS/IDS for effective threat isolation. Its scalability allows management of thousands of firewalls worldwide with minimal resources. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security focuses on application-based security, integrates seamlessly with third-party systems like Cisco ISE, and uses its firewall as a comprehensive security sensor without additional hardware.

Room for Improvement: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall could improve its user interface, simplify configuration processes, and enhance its reporting module. Users have reported performance drops when using multiple add-on features and faced licensing and support challenges. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security requires better integration and visibility, simplified policy creation, and improved reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is lauded for its diverse deployment options, including hybrid models, and comprehensive support service rated highly by users. It offers robust on-premises support. Conversely, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security faces challenges with cloud integration and could benefit from streamlined processes for user accessibility and policy creation. Its customer service receives mixed reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is considered more cost-effective, with transparent pricing and options for free hardware upgrades after four years, leading to savings in management. Its straightforward licensing model offers a solid return on investment. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is often critiqued for its high pricing. While users acknowledge its extensive features, the cost-benefit ratio is perceived as less favorable compared to Barracuda.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Ranking in IoT Security

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (26th), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (11th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (18th), WAN Edge (10th)

Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...

Ranking in IoT Security

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 7.1%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IoT Security

Featured Reviews

RobertSmith15

Product Manager - Cyber Security at M247 Ltd Miami

Ensures data security with advanced intrusion prevention and 24/7 monitoring

I rate the initial setup as ten out of ten. It is straightforward to set up a CloudGen file, taking a couple of hours. Once we have the configuration agreed with the customer, the setup and onboarding are completed within a few hours. We receive the box from Barracuda or from our stores, pre-stage it into our network for initial configuration and Soak testing to ensure functionality. The customer can install it at their location, or we do it on their behalf. We run the firewall in simulation mode to observe traffic and ensure service transition is effective. After confirming functionality with the customer, we transition to a live service.

Read full review

Muhammad Ahsan Riaz

Chief Information Security Officer at Packages Group

Responsive system enhances network management but integration needs refinement

I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage. As an insurance company in the financial sector, we must meet strict regulatory requirements, and Palo Alto has proven to be an excellent solution. Its management is straightforward, the dashboards and reporting are comprehensive, and most importantly, it functions exactly as described in the documentation. For example, when we needed to block YouTube on our network, Palo Alto successfully blocked access while our Cisco firewall failed to block access on iPhones. This highlights the inconsistency we've experienced with different firewalls, whereas Palo Alto has consistently performed as expected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very stable solution."

"Their GPS possibilities and the security that it has, especially the SD-WAN functionality, is very good."

"It's great for handling complex items."

"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to offer firewall support to our clients."

"The antivirus protection or malware protection has been great."

"It can now integrate with Barracuda's XDR."

"The features I find most valuable is the VPN and the fact that we can apply our policies to the program."

"Its stability and SD-WAN features are the most valuable."

More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pros

"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."

"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."

"I like the Cortex Data Lake integration with security automation."

"I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage."

"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."

"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."

"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."

"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros

Cons

"To start working with spam, it takes a while because the product has to see that multiple emails are coming in with all the spam. If it could reduce that amount of time, then we would reduce the amount of users who are receiving spam."

"There could be improvements in licensing. Some licensing aspects are challenging; for example, if you're using an active-passive setup, you have to license both firewalls."

"While using Barracuda CloudGen Firewall, we encounter issues with VPN profiles for Windows."

"When you do any commit, it locks your next access. If you are making a change to the device, from the security standpoint it's fine, but from the admin side it's not good. When you make changes, after each and every one it becomes locked."

"The biggest issue that I have with this solution is that it is not super intuitive. Once you know what to do, things make sense, but you can't just open the program and start doing things. It would be great if there was a little bit more guided usage inside the program."

"Can be underpowered if you choose to use all available add-on features. Just be careful when sizing your unit. Make sure you take into account what features you will be turning on, and work with your sales rep to get the model that can handle that load."

"The usability for the administrator's experience needs improvement. My system administrator has some questions about its overall connectivity and flexibility."

"There should be improvements in the management aspect of the firewall. Specifically, it would be beneficial to merge the existing application policy with the main policy into a single unified policy to improve manageability."

More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall cons

"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."

"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."

"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."

"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."

"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."

"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."

"Palo Alto Networks IoT Security's reporting capabilities are less comprehensive and robust than those provided by Cisco."

"The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When the corporation purchases something, it follows a request-for-proposal process and the best price wins. So, I think Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is reasonably priced, though I’m not sure of the exact amount"

"The platform is inexpensive compared to other vendors."

"My advice is to try and evaluate it (Barracuda offers a trial period of one month)."

"The product is a bit cheaper than some solutions."

"It is a product with a very transparent model of licensing. In the sense of hidden expenses, they do not exist with this model. "

"Pricing and licensing are fine. It's worth the value because every four years, if I buy any other product, I have to replace my hardware. But with Barracuda I get a free hardware upgrade. Today I'm using Xbox. After four years I can take another Xbox or a Ybox."

"We evaluated a lot of different options. We concluded that Barracuda NG Firewall provided the most features for an exemplary price. "

"The 600 series is about USD $10,000 a year and the 80 is USD $400 a year."

More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pricing and cost advice

"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."

"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."

"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."

"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Performing Arts

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?

The encryption and the security standards are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?

The license price of Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is lower than others, and maintenance or support is included.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?

The interface of Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is not as user-friendly as others. It is a bit complicated and could be improved. The initial setup can also be complex because it involves navigating d...

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

The major challenge is the integration with existing complex production lines. These architectures were developed with a focus on automation functionalities, not security. Finding the right integra...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

I use Palo Alto Networks IoT Security ( /products/palo-alto-networks-iot-security-reviews ) for discovering automation devices and detecting various types of data traffic on automation infrastructu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Compared 20% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Competitors

Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 30% of the time

Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 22% of the time

Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 17% of the time

Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Compared 11% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall

August 2025

Download Barracuda CloudGen Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

August 2025

Download Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report

Also Known As

Barracuda NextGen Firewall, Barracuda CloudGen Firewalls

No data available

Overview

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is a comprehensive network security solution that provides advanced protection for organizations of all sizes. It offers next-generation firewall capabilities, including application control, intrusion prevention, and web filtering.

With its integrated VPN functionality, it ensures secure remote access for employees. CloudGen Firewall also includes advanced threat intelligence, leveraging real-time updates to detect and block emerging threats. Its centralized management console simplifies administration and provides visibility into network traffic.

CloudGen Firewall can easily adapt to changing business needs based on its scalable architecture.

Barracuda Networks

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

ARZ, Bauer, CBCX Technologies, Diamant-groep, Eissmann Group Automotive, European Youth Olympics, Exalo Drilling, FineLine Technologies, Geocell, Grimaldi, Infront Sports & Media, Odlo, Schenker Deutschland AG, Tilak, Verbandsgeneinde Zell, Conservas El Cidacos S.A., Institute for Emergency Medicine and Medicine Management, Erwin Muller GmbH, Info-Tech: NGF is Champion, Schoellerbank, IZB Informatik-Zentrum, RHI AG, Berglandmilch, Antenne Bayern, Sanochemia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

July 2025

Free Report: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.