Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security comparison

Barracuda Networks and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the IoT Security category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. Barracuda Networks holds a 2.1% mindshare in IS, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Read 40 Barracuda CloudGen Firewall reviews
  • 2,388 Views
  • 119 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Read 11 Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reviews
  • 1,414 Views
  • 1,414 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Palo Alto Networks IoT Security compete in the network security category. Barracuda appears to have the upper hand due to its user-friendly interface and cost-effective offerings, making it more appealing for businesses prioritizing ease of use and efficient security.

Features: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers real-time firewall logs, TINA VPN tunnels, and robust Application Control with IPS/IDS for effective threat isolation. Its scalability allows management of thousands of firewalls worldwide with minimal resources. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security focuses on application-based security, integrates seamlessly with third-party systems like Cisco ISE, and uses its firewall as a comprehensive security sensor without additional hardware.

Room for Improvement: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall could improve its user interface, simplify configuration processes, and enhance its reporting module. Users have reported performance drops when using multiple add-on features and faced licensing and support challenges. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security requires better integration and visibility, simplified policy creation, and improved reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is lauded for its diverse deployment options, including hybrid models, and comprehensive support service rated highly by users. It offers robust on-premises support. Conversely, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security faces challenges with cloud integration and could benefit from streamlined processes for user accessibility and policy creation. Its customer service receives mixed reviews.

Pricing and ROI: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is considered more cost-effective, with transparent pricing and options for free hardware upgrades after four years, leading to savings in management. Its straightforward licensing model offers a solid return on investment. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is often critiqued for its high pricing. While users acknowledge its extensive features, the cost-benefit ratio is perceived as less favorable compared to Barracuda.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Ranking in IoT Security
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (33rd), Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions (14th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (24th), WAN Edge (13th)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Secu...
Ranking in IoT Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is 6.2%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security6.2%
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall2.1%
Other91.7%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Talha Bashir - PeerSpot reviewer
Muhammad Talha Bashir
Offensive Security Analyst at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Centralized security management has protected our hybrid network and supports secure remote work
Overall, Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is very effective, but there is always room for improvement. One area that could be enhanced is the user interface, making it slightly more intuitive for new users. Additionally, advanced reporting and analytics could be more customized to provide deeper insights. Despite this, the firewall performs reliably and meets most of our organizational needs. One additional improvement that could enhance the experience is faster troubleshooting support or more detailed guided documentation for complex configurations. While the firewall is reliable, having more step-by-step tutorials or video guidance could help new users set up and optimize. Overall, the enhancement would make the platform even more user-friendly without affecting its current strong performance.
Read full review
Muhammad Ahsan Riaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Muhammad Ahsan Riaz
Chief Information Security Officer at Packages Group
Responsive system enhances network management but integration needs refinement
I find Palo Alto Networks IoT Security to be highly responsive, and its separate management and data planes are a major advantage. As an insurance company in the financial sector, we must meet strict regulatory requirements, and Palo Alto has proven to be an excellent solution. Its management is straightforward, the dashboards and reporting are comprehensive, and most importantly, it functions exactly as described in the documentation. For example, when we needed to block YouTube on our network, Palo Alto successfully blocked access while our Cisco firewall failed to block access on iPhones. This highlights the inconsistency we've experienced with different firewalls, whereas Palo Alto has consistently performed as expected.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I wanted to go to a software-defined WAN and in Barracuda they have a specific protocol called TINA (Transport Independent Network Architecture). You can create a master policy over the internet and it allows you to do Quality of Services on top of it. That is really helpful for me."
"The features I find most valuable is the VPN and the fact that we can apply our policies to the program."
"I rate the customer service as ten out of ten."
"It is a very stable solution."
"It can now integrate with Barracuda's XDR."
"It provides a lot of functionality adhering to the current trends."
"One of the big benefits of the product is that it allows you to manage big environments with fewer resources."
"Its ability to block incoming attacks is valuable. Its logging, traffic monitoring, and VPN capabilities are also valuable."
More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pros
"The key strength of Palo Alto firewalls lies in their application-based approach, offering a much finer level of control compared to traditional firewalls."
"The stability is pretty good; it's a very solid solution, so if customers are looking for an IoT/OT solution, they should consider Palo Alto Networks IoT Security."
"It is simple to use. We just need to enable features and then configure IoT policies."
"This solution has been most valuable for establishing a VPN and implementing allow/deny rules. It has also enabled us to create security policies. It is an easy solution to customise when it comes to creating templates and pulling reports."
"Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
"Palo Alto is valued for its GlobalProtect feature, which offers a range of security options, including user ID mapping and VPNs."
"I like the threat information, and we can share the logging data with Cortex Data Lake."
"From a security standpoint, it provides a comprehensive range of standard security features that align with our requirements."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security pros
 

Cons

"However, the solution isn’t perfect. It sometimes lets through emails incorrectlycategorized as safe but malicious. I believe the tool could be improved by incorporating artificial intelligence to enhance its email analysis capabilities, though I’m unsure if this feature is currently available."
"The price is a bit higher than other vendors."
"​Sometimes we have a need for detailed reports. Barracuda NG Firewall does not have a reports module and uses a satellite application."
"The biggest issue that I have with this solution is that it is not super intuitive. Once you know what to do, things make sense, but you can't just open the program and start doing things. It would be great if there was a little bit more guided usage inside the program."
"Barracuda CloudGen Firewall should work a little bit more with the logs so that, in our company, we can generate a little bit more reports and get a bit more statistics, which would be fine for us."
"There is room for improvement in performance and the support language. The support they're providing right now is from a different country, and in our country, there are people—network admins and IT heads—who don't speak English properly. So Barracuda needs to provide support agents who speak additional languages, such as Bangla."
"The features are a bit limited compared to other vendors."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly dashboard and an easier interface."
More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall cons
"It would be beneficial if Palo Alto IoT Security could integrate with Let's Encrypt for free SSL certificates."
"There can be more automation in terms of security and detection. It is already good."
"The reporting for this solution could be improved. The logs we receive are only saved for one week. We would like to have the database timeframe increased to a month or two for historical reporting as well as increased storage capabilities to support this data and reporting."
"While not overly complex, its usability could be enhanced, making it a more intuitive experience for everyone."
"More application signatures are required."
"I had to call the support because there were some devices that were not showing up."
"It would be beneficial to have a more centralized and user-friendly platform that could consolidate all the necessary information, which proved challenging during the initial POC phase."
"The support is in line with Palo Alto Networks services for other products but needs improvement."
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The 600 series is about USD $10,000 a year and the 80 is USD $400 a year."
"The pricing is very cheap compared to Cisco ASA, which we used before, and compared to Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet. Barracuda has different solutions for different people. So for my SMB-level infrastructure, Barracuda has given me a proper solution that is half of the price of Palo Alto or Fortinet."
"It's not the most expensive, but it's certainly not cheap."
"The solution's price is reasonable."
"Pricing is good. Licensing is pretty much automatic if using Control Center."
"Pricing and licensing are fine. It's worth the value because every four years, if I buy any other product, I have to replace my hardware. But with Barracuda I get a free hardware upgrade. Today I'm using Xbox. After four years I can take another Xbox or a Ybox."
"The solution costs more than 800 Euros to purchase an F18, which is an entry model, and then another 500 Euros for instant replacement, and 500 Euros for energized updates. The total package would be around 1,900 Euros for five years license and all updates for an entry model."
"We pay around 150 to 200 Euros per year and there are no additional costs."
More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pricing and cost advice
"The initial investment is substantial, but the renewal costs make it financially unsustainable."
"While Palo Alto Networks IoT Security might cost more than some competitors, its features and effectiveness justify the price tag."
"The successful migration trend suggests that Palo Alto provides a superior cost-benefit ratio for firewall solutions."
"The pricing for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security is a bit high."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
7%
Performing Arts
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?
Our experience with Barracuda CloudGen Firewall pricing and licensing has been reasonable and transparent. The setup cost was aligned with the features and security it provided. The licensing is fl...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?
Overall, Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is very effective, but there is always room for improvement. One area that could be enhanced is the user interface, making it slightly more intuitive for new us...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Barracuda CloudGen Firewall?
My main use case for Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is for our network security and network traffic management. I rely on it most often for protecting the networks from threats and ensuring secure con...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
One thing I communicated to them is that they need to provide a managed update for their IoT devices.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
I use it for one of my customers, and my role is to help my customer with the solution. They use it for their IoT devices in the field, and they have a lot of sensors out there for their heating eq...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?
The pricing is not that bad. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Compared 14% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Compared 6% of the time
Netgate pfSense vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Logo
Netgate pfSense vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Compared 5% of the time
Sophos Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Logo
Sophos Firewall vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Compared 5% of the time
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Logo
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Compared 4% of the time
More Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Competitors
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Armis vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 27% of the time
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 17% of the time
Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Phosphorus Cybersecurity vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 15% of the time
Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Logo
Azure Sphere vs Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Compared 13% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
January 2026
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall reportDownload Barracuda CloudGen Firewall product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
January 2026
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security reportDownload Palo Alto Networks IoT Security product report
 

Also Known As

Barracuda NextGen Firewall, Barracuda CloudGen Firewalls
No data available
 

Overview

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is a comprehensive network security solution that provides advanced protection for organizations of all sizes. It offers next-generation firewall capabilities, including application control, intrusion prevention, and web filtering. 

With its integrated VPN functionality, it ensures secure remote access for employees. CloudGen Firewall also includes advanced threat intelligence, leveraging real-time updates to detect and block emerging threats. Its centralized management console simplifies administration and provides visibility into network traffic. 

CloudGen Firewall can easily adapt to changing business needs based on its scalable architecture. 

Barracuda Networks

Introducing comprehensive IoT Security solutions tailored for enterprises, healthcare, and industrial operations. Safeguard every device, visible or unseen, with Zero Trust security protocols, ensuring protection against known and unknown threats. With rapid 15X faster deployment times, Enterprise IoT Security, Medical IoT Security, and Industrial OT Security streamline operations, allowing teams to prioritize security over setup. Seamlessly integrate with Palo Alto Networks ML-Powered NGFWs or Prisma Access for swift implementation, making your infrastructure IoT-aware within minutes. Eliminate blind spots across existing IT and security solutions with playbook-driven, built-in integrations, and simplify cloud delivery for deployment across any architecture without the need for multiple sensors or network redesign. Protect your assets and ensure uninterrupted operations with our comprehensive IoT security solutions.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

ARZ, Bauer, CBCX Technologies, Diamant-groep, Eissmann Group Automotive, European Youth Olympics, Exalo Drilling, FineLine Technologies, Geocell, Grimaldi, Infront Sports & Media, Odlo, Schenker Deutschland AG, Tilak, Verbandsgeneinde Zell, Conservas El Cidacos S.A., Institute for Emergency Medicine and Medicine Management, Erwin Muller GmbH, Info-Tech: NGF is Champion, Schoellerbank, IZB Informatik-Zentrum, RHI AG, Berglandmilch, Antenne Bayern, Sanochemia
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
December 2025
Free Report: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks IoT Security report.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.