Bareos vs Zerto comparison

Read 306 Zerto reviews

8,092 Views
3,849 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Bareos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Zerto and Bareos compete in data protection and recovery. Zerto is more advanced due to its continuous data protection and replication strengths, whereas Bareos is cost-effective due to its open-source model.

Features: Zerto offers continuous data protection, seamless VM migrations, and hybrid cloud environment capabilities. Bareos provides wide platform compatibility and strong data backup features, particularly in Linux environments. Zerto's advanced replication and recovery are superior, while Bareos supports more systems, ideal for open-source software.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto streamlines deployment with strong support, simplifying setup for enterprises. Bareos needs more technical expertise for deployment, relying on community resources for support. Zerto's structured support increases its appeal, while Bareos suits organizations with in-house expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto requires significant initial investment, offering high ROI through its feature set and reliability. Bareos has lower initial costs due to its open-source model, providing a cost-effective option for budget-limited organizations. Though Zerto's costs are higher, its long-term ROI benefits comprehensive disaster recovery. Bareos offers ROI fitting for those focusing on cost-efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Bareos vs. Zerto Report (Updated: April 2025).

Bareos vs. Zerto

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bareos

Ranking in Cloud Backup

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zerto

Ranking in Cloud Backup

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

306

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (3rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bareos is 2.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zerto is 4.1%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

GiovanniRamirez

Senior IT Consultant at Xerif

High-performance backup with fast recovery and robust encryption features

I use Gluster as a backup. In fact, my company has a product called xBackup, which is completely based on Gluster. It includes various tools and technologies for high-performance backup, including solid-state technologies and mechanical disks, among others. Additionally, I use various other…

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of installation it provides its users."

"Bareos offers encryption on the fly, compression on the fly, and a robust and stable configuration."

"The most valuable features are the continuous streaming, that it takes very little CPU usage — it doesn't affect production — and the recovery time is very short."

"Since we are at a bank, there are certain protocols in place where we need to have RPO and RTO times of two hours or less. Zerto does a great job of setting those times and alerting us if those can't be met. We have our help desk actively monitoring that. It is extremely helpful that Zerto lists what is falling out of compliance in regards to RPO and RTO. It has been great in that regard."

"The most valuable feature is the point in time recovery. This allows us to recover at any point in time, up to a minute or so."

"The continuation to the public cloud has been especially helpful where I can pretty much work with things like hosts and clusters as part of the data center."

"The best feature of Zerto is the fast, automated backup and recovery. The data lift for applications is short, with minimal data loss."

"The main purpose of this tool is to allow failover between different data centers and different locations. When one site is unavailable, we can start the failover activity and perform the failover task. When a primary location is unavailable, or there is some hardware or logical issue at the primary location, it allows us to resolve the problem. We are able to start services at safe locations. We handle the disaster recovery process, and this is the main function for which we are using it all the time."

"The replication and recovery features are the most valuable... On two occasions, other departments in our organization reported issues with specific virtual machines. We used the checkpoint feature of the Zerto to enable the recovery of those machines to a point that was a few minutes prior to the problem."

"You can set the number of days a VM can be rolled back in case of corruption or virus infection."

More Zerto pros

Cons

"Improvement is needed in the graphical web administration tool."

"The virtual machine backup is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"I would like to see some improvements with APIs going into the cloud so that they can more natively orchestrate the migration point-to-point without special hands-on configuration. Azure does some of that natively by having an agent on the VM, but Zerto could improve on its APIs into Azure or Google so that spinning up works more natively in that environment. It would make things smoother."

"The improvement that I would like to see is a little bit easier product knowledge, things like that. It's getting a lot better than it was before because it's not as old of a product as Cisco, but if you look for something like Cisco routing and networking, you'll find millions of articles out there and it's everywhere."

"Zerto's effect on our RPO can be improved."

"Some of the integrations with our internal tools, in particular, company-specific ones, do not work. In cases like this, we have to ask for additional support."

"It would be nice if we were able to purchase single licenses for Zerto. As it is now, scaling requires that we purchase a multi-pack."

"The backup functions are in need of improvement."

"Maybe the reporting for the failover test could be a little better."

"Zerto needs to improve its support for VMware Lifecycle Manager."

More Zerto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the open-source version of Bareos, which means I used the free version of the solution."

"I do not have anything to compare it to. It is expensive, but I am not going to squabble about the price when I bring the system up in a disaster. It is what it is."

"We paid a big investment upfront with renewal fees each year."

"Zerto is not overly expensive. It's worth what we're getting for it, but with tough times, a discount would be beneficial."

"Zerto is more expensive than competitors, making the price difference pretty high. While it is very expensive, it's very powerful and good at what it does. The cost is why we are not leveraging it for everything in the organization. If it was dirt cheap, we would have LTR and DR on everything because it would just make sense to use it."

"At the time I had purchased the product, the pricing was fair and reasonable. Over the years, costs have certainly gone up, which makes it hard for healthcare companies to use the solution."

"The cost per VM is a bit high."

"It is not cheap, but it is reasonable for what it is offering. It gives me the peace of mind that my data is protected. It is worth the cost."

"I wish it were cheaper, but I would purchase it again at the same price."

More Zerto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

16%

University

12%

Non Profit

10%

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bareos?

The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of installation it provides its users.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bareos?

The open-source version of Bareos, along with their commercial support plans, offer very fair pricing and good value.

What needs improvement with Bareos?

Improvement is needed in the graphical web administration tool. Although everything can be done via the command line, an improved graphical interface would be more comfortable. I've seen improvemen...

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

The setup is somewhat expensive. I'd rate the pricing seven out of ten.

Bacula Enterprise vs Bareos

Comparisons

Compared 74% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bareos

Compared 20% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Bareos

Compared 5% of the time

More Bareos Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Zerto

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Zerto

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Zerto

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs Zerto

Compared 8% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs Zerto

Compared 6% of the time

More Zerto Competitors

Product Reports

Cloud Backup

Download Bareos product report

Download Zerto product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Bareos is an open-source backup solution designed for businesses seeking reliable data protection. It provides a robust set of features to handle backup, recovery, and archiving, catering to enterprises with high data volume needs.

Bareos offers extensive capabilities, focusing on ensuring data integrity and availability. Its open-source nature allows flexibility and adaptability for IT environments, supporting different operating systems and storage types. Typically utilized by organizations requiring scalable and efficient backup systems, Bareos is valued for its comprehensive feature set, although certain areas could benefit from more streamlined deployment processes or enhanced integrations.

What are Bareos's Key Features?

Multiplexing: Allows simultaneous backup of multiple clients to enhance performance.
Data Verification: Ensures backup data integrity, minimizing potential data loss risks.
Volume Management: Efficiently manages storage volumes for optimal space utilization.
Scheduling Flexibility: Customizable backup schedules tailored to organizational needs.
Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with Windows, Linux, macOS, ensuring broad applicability.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Cost Efficiency: Open-source, reducing overall data protection expenses.
Scalability: Handles significant data loads, suitable for growing enterprises.
Community Support: Access to a dedicated user community for issue resolution.
Customization: Tailorable to fit specific organizational data backup workflows.

Bareos is effectively implemented across industries like healthcare, finance, and retail, where safeguarding substantial volumes of sensitive data is critical. It enables these sectors to meet compliance standards, ensuring secure and reliable data protection without excessive costs. Bareos's adaptability to various IT infrastructures makes it a choice for specialized industry requirements.

Bareos

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Bareos vs. Zerto