Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Dell Technologies and Zerto are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Dell Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Zerto is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8. Dell Technologies holds a 3.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to Zerto’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zerto users who would recommend it.
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...
Read 15 Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines reviews
  • 2,421 Views
  • 1,184 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
HPE Zerto Software
Read 309 HPE Zerto Software reviews
  • 9,506 Views
  • 1,758 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2025

Zerto and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines compete in the disaster recovery solutions category. Zerto appears to have the upper hand due to its hardware independence, seamless integration, and low recovery point objective (RPO) times, which make it more adaptable and efficient for varied environments.

Features: Zerto is hardware-independent with seamless integration into vCenter Server, offering near-zero RPOs. It supports continuous disaster recovery and automatic IP address changes. Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines provides real-time data protection, allowing detailed point-in-time recoveries with robust remote and local data protection features.

Room for Improvement: Zerto could improve its reporting, backup functionalities, and offer more flexible licensing options. Enhancements in its cloud integration and mobile capabilities are suggested. Dell should focus on simplifying its configuration process, improving the user interface, and addressing cost issues, which can be burdensome for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zerto supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, praised for outstanding customer service, albeit a slight decline post-acquisition. Dell RecoverPoint emphasizes on-premises setups tailored for traditional infrastructural needs, receiving excellent customer service feedback, though it struggles with complex support escalation.

Pricing and ROI: Zerto's per-VM pricing model is cost-effective for businesses with limited critical systems, offering significant ROI through reduced downtime and efficiency improvements. It's seen as more expensive than some rivals. Dell RecoverPoint, while also costly and based on VM count and capacity, provides strong disaster recovery features, though its pricing might be restrictive for smaller firms.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtu...
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Zerto Software
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
309
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Backup (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is 3.9%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 10.2%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
 

Featured Reviews

ClaudioSalgado - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites
It offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots. It allows for automated VM protection during processes like failover and testing, and it offers replication flexibility across multiple environments, including local centers and secondary sites. It also provides IP address management when network configurations differ across sites.
Read full review
Sachin Vinay - PeerSpot reviewer
Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features
Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the data center recovery administration and the time of recovery."
"The generalization of the journals allows us to go back in time and choose the snapshot suitable for us. We can grab it as needed."
"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."
"RecoverPoint replicates workloads fast."
"The speed and the footprint the solution uses regarding storage are great."
"It is a point-in-time restore, which is quite handy."
"The technical support from Dell is excellent."
"Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines offers key features like any point-in-time recovery without needing scheduled snapshots."
More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines pros
"Most of the time, this is at least a two person job. We used to have three people doing it. Previously, when we had a disaster recovery drill, the way it worked was 12 of us would show up in the office on a Friday night and work overnight from 12:00 AM on Friday night to 8:00 AM in the morning on Saturday. Then, three of us would be working for four hours out of those eight or nine hours just getting applications up and running in Arizona. Now, for the disaster recovery drill, I just stay onsite to help and assist anybody else as they need during that time frame and my work is done in about a 30-minute time frame. This is compared to the four or five hours it used to take for the three of us to do it."
"The ability to test a failover non-disruptively with Zerto is valuable, as it doesn't create any downtime for the business."
"The low RPO times of about four to eight seconds are very nice and very valuable to us."
"The ability to fully test your entire environment without actually performing a failover is invaluable."
"The features I find most beneficial about Zerto include continuous data protection, easy configuration, and simplified management with a user-friendly interface."
"Since we are at a bank, there are certain protocols in place where we need to have RPO and RTO times of two hours or less. Zerto does a great job of setting those times and alerting us if those can't be met. We have our help desk actively monitoring that. It is extremely helpful that Zerto lists what is falling out of compliance in regards to RPO and RTO. It has been great in that regard."
"The mobile application is very useful as a real-time monitoring, reporting tool. When asked the status of our machine backup and recovery ability, an easy answer is to display the status on the real-time application or browser. The Zerto Analytics tool helps predict future storage needs by tracking trends in space, journal size, and I/O rate. These are reportable statistics making quantifiable tracking easy and accurate. Having a web interface simplifies access by other system administrators."
"Zerto's greatest strength is its speed."
More HPE Zerto Software pros
 

Cons

"Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover."
"I would like to have the HTML 5 interface working because it is currently not functioning with the VMware environment."
"Maybe integration with Kubernetes for OpenShift would be helpful."
"The biggest challenge we faced was attempting replication between two different kinds of storage systems, like IBM on one side and Dell EMC storage systems on the other, before opting for VPLEX."
"In some cases, the response times could improve, but we haven't had issues with their support."
"The solution is not easy to use. It's actually quite hard. If it could be simplified it might be better for the end user."
"The solution currently supports only VMware. There is increasing demand for compatibility with other hypervisors, such as Hyper V and KVM Proxmox. Additionally, licensing has become less flexible and more expensive."
"The configuration process seems a bit challenging, and the installation takes a bit longer than expected."
More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines cons
"When it comes to failover tests, we would like to be able to take that extra step to shut things down and see what it looks like at the other site versus just doing it in a virtual environment."
"The number one thing we have found we would like changed so far is the cost per VM. It would be great to get that pricing reduced."
"Some of the integrations with our internal tools, in particular, company-specific ones, do not work. In cases like this, we have to ask for additional support."
"Some of the cloud instructions around VNets and peering of networks could be clearer with some best-case examples."
"When building out a VPG and doing the machine types within Azure, they were not coming across correctly. It would say it had a CPU and memory of a specific type, but it was not accurate... It was a bug and they were working on it."
"It would be good if we could store a snapshot of the images coming through so that we can always go back and have a vision history."
"Our operational teams have discussed the ability to integrate multiple Zerto cloud platforms more seamlessly. For example, we have acquired 22 companies over the last seven years. Some already had it deployed, and integrating those existing deployments into our primary deployment is more challenging than it could be. We have provided our feedback to them."
"They should not make it so expensive so that I can buy more of it."
More HPE Zerto Software cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was a part of a backup solution. So, it was free for us."
"The tool is expensive. If one means cheaply priced and ten means expensive, I rate the tool's price as a seven."
"This is an expensive product."
"There is a license required for this solution and the pricing depends on how many virtual machines you have."
"Pricing-wise, it is pretty much fair for any customer who only has a VMware environment. Licensing is based on the number of VMs that you want to protect at any given point in time. Licensing is not based on size."
"This is not a very cheap solution and compared to others, it is expensive."
"It's expensive, for sure, but for us, it comes down to the fact that we do not replicate our entire environment using Zerto. We replicate the mission-critical servers and services, so the yearly cost of Zerto is heavily outweighed by the potential cost of an outage."
"Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up."
"Zerto is pretty reasonable. I haven't checked to see how much Rubrik is going to quote us for their solution. At least for us, the price doesn't play a big factor in the decision-making because it is a pretty small deployment for our use case."
"In general, it's pretty fair because it is software. In our case, we built our own colo. So, the cost of the colo was very expensive, and that's where a lot of the equipment is. The same thing is there if we were going to spin up in the cloud, but as a solution, in general, it's pretty fair for what you get out of it and how it works. It's not cheap, but at the same time, you get what you pay for, and it's definitely worth the cost. You just have to understand that the cost of the software alone is not the total cost of the project of doing ransomware protection or disaster recovery. It's a piece of the pie, not the entire pie."
"We have always been able to get the pricing worked out. At this new company I am right now, we are doing well. We sometimes go through a third party to help us with pricing, but Zerto is fairly decently priced, especially when you consider some of the other solutions that are out there which could be very expensive."
"The cost is not dirt cheap but also is not terrible."
"It's very equitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it. It's something that we utilize for the licenses per core as far as what we're backing up. Therefore, it's very cost-efficient as far as the licensing goes. For the amount of stuff that we're backing up and what we're utilizing it for, the licensing is not very expensive at all."
"There is a lot of confusion with Zerto licensing. They have a migration license and a replication license. They should simplify the licensing process. The migration license costs a lot of money, and it is only on a one-time basis. If you use that license, it ties to that VM. I might re-migrate that VM in the next five to ten years. It is another environment, but my license is stuck there. The replication license is fine, and I have no issue with its pricing model, but they should simplify the migration license."
More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user159711 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 9, 2014
VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto
Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
One of the standout features of Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is its real-time data protection capability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
Most of the time, we buy perpetual license solutions.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines?
Although we can change the IP address, it would be good to have some other sort of orchestration to make life easier to manage when we failover.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...
See all answers
What do you like most about Zerto?
Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?
I ballpark Zerto's pricing at about $1,000 per VM, which I find fair for what it does, but the cost of entry was tough initially due to the minimum number needed to start. I really needed to prove ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
Compared 38% of the time
Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
Compared 21% of the time
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
Compared 5% of the time
Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Azure Site Recovery vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
Compared 4% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Logo
Commvault Cloud vs Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
Compared 3% of the time
More Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Competitors
Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 15% of the time
VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 10% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 9% of the time
Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 7% of the time
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs HPE Zerto Software Logo
Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs HPE Zerto Software
Compared 5% of the time
More HPE Zerto Software Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines
June 2025
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines reportDownload Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines product report
Buyer's Guide
HPE Zerto Software
June 2025
HPE Zerto Software reportDownload HPE Zerto Software product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Zerto Virtual Replication
 

Overview

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines enables quick recovery of VMware virtual machines and allows you to efficiently test, manage and orchestrate operational backup and disaster recovery operations. 

With tight integration with VMware, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is storage and application agnostic, with built-in automation accessible via VMware vSphere web client plug-in.  

When cloud becomes a vital part of your disaster recovery strategy, RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is also web-enabled, providing efficient replication to AWS and VMware Cloud on AWS. 

RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite. 

Dell Technologies

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Zerto
 

Sample Customers

Rushmore Electric Power Cooperative, PCS Publishing, Noble Foods
United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies
Buyer's Guide
Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software
June 2025
Free Report: Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs. HPE Zerto Software report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.